User talk:Dlohcierekim

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Archives



PLEASE ADD MESSAGES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE .

welcome to my talk page![edit]


Valentine Kornienko[edit]

Hi! you tagged article Valentine Kornienko with "Prod blp", but the subject of the article is clearly dead, so it isn't BLP. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:07, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

And just marked the wp:bio s not living. Dead, like my brain. thanks. Dlohcierekim 23:08, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Hakki Ögleman[edit]

Hi, Thanks for your welcome message on my Talk page. I have a couple of questions that I hope you can answer:

First: I think most of the tags (orphan; no inline cites; needs categorization) that were initially placed on the Hakki Ögleman page I created by Wikipedia editors have been addressed. Is there a way that I can now remove those tags?

Second: I notice that when I place inline cites that refer back to an earlier full citation, the new citations take on the footnote number of the old citation. So you might go through the article and after inline citation #6 you then see inline citation #2, which seems a bit disorienting. Is it supposed to look like that, or am I doing something wrong? I had expected the citation would be (in this example) #7, and then the actual citation would say Ibid. I guess this way is more economical though.

Thanks for your help.

TumayT (talk) 01:13, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

@TumayT: U R welcome. Yes, if the issues are addressed it would probably be OK to remove the tags, though you might want to wait for another article reviewer to do that. Yes, the cite scheme is confusing at first, but economical. They put a lot of thought into the system, and it works much better than the works cited formatting I learned in school. Dlohcierekim 01:33, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

I didn't ask for a redirect to a non-existant section in a mostly unrelated article[edit]

I asked for a deletion to make space. Simple enough. --Niemti (talk) 02:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps i did not see the edit summary for that. Since there was no rationale i did not see the ratioanle in the original CSD, I did not have enough info. My apologies. Dlohcierekim 02:03, 21 December 2013 (UTC)


CocoaPods notability[edit]

Thanks for reaching out and doing the work you do! I have one question atm, which is regarding this tag:

Do I understand it correctly to mean that there should be more references to screencasts/blog posts/etc? And if they’re not created by me can I safely add them myself?

Eloy Durán (talk) 11:17, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marie Ruoff Byrum[edit]

try to source

Your request for undeletion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marie Ruoff Byrum. JohnCD (talk) 23:03, 23 December 2013 (UTC) JohnCD (talk) 23:03, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Message for saving the Hantu Laut article[edit]

Thank you Wikipedian for letting me create this article on a draft. You can reply me if you anything further to say.

Puma sajuk (talk) 20:03 23 December 2013 (UTC) @Puma sajuk: Very pleased to help. Happy editing. Dlohcierekim 03:13, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Andrea Mendiola[edit]

I was looking for an appropriate CSD tag for this article when I saw the talk page. You apparently have seen this person before, I just had a laugh at it. It looks like she copied the references from Selena Gomez and pasted them into the references for her page. Pretty smart for a 10 year old girl. Bluefist talk 00:34, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Yes. I just deleted this this afternoon. And look at all the accomplishments. Dlohcierekim 00:36, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
I was looking through your contributions to see when you would have seen her before, and found this. I find it funny that some 10 year old girl feels the need to be on wikipedia no matter what, even by breaking rules. This whole thing just gave me a good laugh. Bluefist talk 00:38, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
I think it's her mom. I can't see a child coming up with the fake ref's so easily. Sad, really. But funny. If you saw the work page i made to keep track, you know how sad-funny this is. Dlohcierekim 00:42, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
The interesting thing is that by the time I got her warned and an SSI report made out, another admin had deleted the last iteration and blocked her. Dlohcierekim 00:45, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Louis Joseph Posner, reliable sources, etc.[edit]

By way of further context, you might want to take a look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Lawline. What88 is a suspected sock. One of the similarities linking the two is that, when Lawline's efforts failed to steer Posner and related articles in a particular direction, he blanked them and undertook to have them deleted. JohnInDC (talk) 15:50, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

@JohnInDC:I think he started Louis Joseph Posner, and it makes up the bulk of his edits. Then there is a related article that he has struggled to delete. He's is probably blockable 'cause of the earlier legal threat block. I reread the Louis thing and kept feeling like Louis is NN. But there have been other edits and it might pass an AfD, so there it is. Dlohcierekim 16:00, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. You had been spending some time on this and I wanted to be sure you understood that things might not be exactly as they were being portrayed to you. We'll see how the chips fall - JohnInDC (talk) 16:10, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
No problem. Dlohcierekim 16:14, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
At this juncture, we need to focus on the AfD for the Posner article, rather than coming up with conspiracy theories. Thanks. User:What88 18:03, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── I was perfectly content to not take notice of this whole affair. At this juncture, you've attracted enough attention with your efforts to get the thing deleted that one cannot help but take official notice. Dlohcierekim 18:26, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Michigan gubernatorial election 2014[edit]

I already posted a thread on Talk:Michigan gubernatorial election, 2014 and also sent a message on the other editor's talk page. But the other editor, User talk:2602:304:B0FD:19C0:90AA:941F:B0AF:76CF called my message uncivil and blanked out that page. You can read his talk page's history at [1]. Steelbeard1 (talk) 01:28, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

@Steelbeard1:replied on your talk.d on't know what more can be done beyond an RfC on the content. Dlohcierekim 01:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
I see he blanked your posting as well. I've sent messages to other editors of the article. Steelbeard1 (talk) 01:42, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

He reverted again. Can you revert back? Steelbeard1 (talk) 01:46, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

@Steelbeard1:absolutely not. AND you need to stay off is talk page. BOTH of you need to stop until the matter is resolved. Dlohcierekim 02:13, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Okay. I chose to report him in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring and I've already contacted other editors of the Michigan gubernatorial election, 2014 article. Steelbeard1 (talk) 02:15, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
@Steelbeard1:See the article talk. Dlohcierekim 02:37, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for all the great suggestions! 21:41, 1 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Remarkablebeauty (talkcontribs)

Skudeneshavn International Literature and Culture festival[edit]

Hello Dlohcierekim – I notice you deleted the Skudeneshavn International Literature and Culture festival article. Please could you userify it for me so that I can see whether I can do anything with this material, either as an article or possibly as a section in the Skudeneshavn page. I would, of course, consult you before republishing a page of this title. Thanks — Hebrides (talk) 12:00, 5 January 2014 (UTC) Yes check.svg Done

Lawline SSI[edit]

Your report was on "lawline", not "Lawline", and didn't go in alongside the others. I made a note there along with a link to the report I'd filed (not having seen yours). He's persistent, isn't he? JohnInDC (talk) 13:00, 6 January 2014 (UTC) @JohnInDC: Drat. thanks. Dlohcierekim 20:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Very determined sock has emerged today - are you in a position to block it? JohnInDC (talk) 13:47, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Actually, I thought we had a very persistent User:JohninDC vandalizing appropriate edits — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.176.141.200 (talk) 13:50, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
I'll recuse myself. I think I hear quacking, though. Honestly, if Lawline, You are an intelligent, well-educated person with an understanding of people. How, to an objective 3rd party, would your single-minded determination on this matter look? Look deep inside and take a deep breath. Dlohcierekim 15:22, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
I confess I don't understand. This IP is plainly a Lawline sock. His edits may be reverted on sight, without regard for 3RR. See Wikipedia:EVASION#Evasion_of_blocks and Wikipedia:3rr#3RR_exemptions. Why are we even thinking to discuss the edits of someone who is directly evading his block? JohnInDC (talk) 15:54, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Can't be impartial, I have to ask for discussion. BTW, I think he already switched IP's. You filed the SSI. Someone unconnected needs to decide things. I'm too biased. Make your case for the better versionon the article talk. Dlohcierekim 15:58, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Rather than begin a substantive debate on matters added back in by SPA IPs with an obvious POV - many of which having already been well-covered on the article Talk pages, my inclination is to await resolution of the SSI and then revert the edits that the sock puppets were not entitled to make. It may be a day or so but I'm confident in the outcome. And who knows; by then, VoterMarch might be gone altogether. JohnInDC (talk) 17:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Christopher Karas[edit]

I am a new user and I need your help to expand the Christopher Karas article, he has appeared in several articles and has been on TV and Radio. I would greatly appreciate your help Workingharderthanever (talk) 00:30, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

What is needed is sourcing to keep the thing. You say television and radio? National or local? A feature on a current national news program would help. By this I mean shows like 48 hours, 60 minutes, Dateline. For print we will need in-depth coverage, not just a brief mention or local news. Coverage needs to be ongoing, not just the hiccoughs we saw surrounding the event. It also needs to go deeper than his conflict with the school o board. To be significant, it must show a lasting and pervasive impact. Frankly, I just don't see the level of coverage needed for an article. Show me what you find, and I'll see. If you can add the URL to the bottom of the article page, I can try to format them. Dlohcierekim 00:54, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Dlohcierekim. You have new messages at Cyphoidbomb's talk page.
Message added 07:15, 9 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:15, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Reverend Charles Tooth may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Roots of Contemporary European Identity New York & London:Continuum Press www.continuumbooks.com]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:48, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sherif Esmail may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {1 has been a success entitled [Ba'ad El Gharam].Finally, Esmail won the prize of the Tv Best vocal

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:16, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Louis J. Posner moves[edit]

In your recent set of deletions and moves, the extensive existing Talk pages from the original Louis J. and Louis Joseph pages were lost - now all that remains is the stub of a Talk page from the page that was originally "Louis Posner". I'm not sure why all those moves were necessary but assuming they were, can you please restore the original Talk pages, which discussed - among other things - the extensive sock puppetry, the propriety of including his arrest and disbarment, and the rest? Thanks.

(Also - I don't think there is any question that Tonywikido, a brand new editor following up edits by the 170. IP, is a Lawline sock, but I guess the investigation will sort it all out.) JohnInDC (talk) 18:21, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

so exhausted that I did not undelete the talk. on my way <gasp,pant gasP> Dlohcierekim 18:23, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
In all of this, why didn't you just revert Louis Posner to restore the text that Tinywikido had added? It was still there in that page's history. He never edited Louis J but now with the moves and merges, it appears that he did; and Louis Posner lost its actual edit history. JohnInDC (talk) 19:35, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
The old l posner history is at lj posner. Then I didn't think to leave the holocost article behind. not used to all this merging and messing around. why we had 2 articles on activist posner is beyond me, but it should be fine a l j posner. anyway. open to suggestions, but won't be much online till tuesday Dlohcierekim 21:52, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
He's a real PITA, isn't he? Anyhow I appreciate all your help on keeping him in check. Perhaps one day he'll lose interest - JohnInDC (talk) 15:53, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Templates on new users' talk pages[edit]

Hi Dloh, I just wanted to inform you that some of the {{user:dloh/d}} templates you have been adding to talk pages of users whose articles have been speedied have been formatted wrong--specifically, they said "usr" instead of "user" on some occasions. Jinkinson talk to me 05:54, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

thanks. have to look at that. Dlohcierekim 15:19, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

@Jinkinson:Oh, can me link me to one or two? I need see what happened and why. Thanks, Dlohcierekim 15:26, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Sure. Here's one: [2]
And another: [3] Jinkinson talk to me 15:29, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. Damn ttremors. Shoulda made sure they worked before leaving the page. Dlohcierekim 15:31, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Barnstar[edit]

Admin Barnstar.png The Admin's Barnstar
For diligence in handling a seemingly endless torrent of socks and other administrative issues that have arisen in recent weeks. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 22:05, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
While I can see the LJP AfD is headed towards a consensus that I don't agree with, you've definitely done a helluva job in keeping up with everything arising from the incident while still staying as independent as possible. Well done. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 22:05, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. This means a lot. Dlohcierekim 22:08, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Ray B. Oladapo-Johnson was accepted[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Ray B. Oladapo-Johnson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:53, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Tweaks needed to Ray B. Oladapo-Johnson[edit]

Greetings, published, but can you fix the folllowing:

  • Orphan and Underlinked tags (help pages linked in tags if you need ideas)
  • In Edit mode, you can see a "PERSONDATA" and "DEFAULTSORT" form at bottom of that page, please fill that out for metadata
  • Can you find his year of birth?
  • If you are able to take a photo of him, or get someone who has to release it to WP:Creative Commons, a pic would be great.

Nice work! MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:59, 16 January 2014 (UTC)


@MatthewVanitas: Actually, I just formatted the ref's. Could not find more info, however hard did I try. I can probably fill out person data and delete sort. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 16:01, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
For "Underlinked", just wikilink (blue text, coded by double-brackes) key terms. Not commonly-known words, but specific parks, beetle, etc. And only on the first occurrence of a given term. Good deal. MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:10, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Canine Ectopic Ureter (January 23)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

ANI thread[edit]

You may be interested in WP:ANI#Bad deletions, WP:IDIDNTHERETHAT, and Personal attacks by admin Jni since you commented in the relevant WT:CSD thread. DES (talk) 00:27, 24 January 2014 (UTC) @DESiegel: Sigh. I was afraid it would come to that. I told him I thought he needed a vacation. He seemed to agree. Dlohcierekim 00:43, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Fijian food[edit]

It's not so bad to be speedied. Do you want to take it to WP:AfD? Bearian (talk) 00:12, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Nope. Thanks for the note. Dlohcierekim 00:28, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bryan Rodwell (organist) (January 29)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Unclosed tags; AfC submission[edit]

Hi. this edit introduced <center>and <big> tags without closing them, so that the bigness and centeredness propagated down the page. I have fixed this one, but I let you know in case this is a standard form you have used elsewhere.

Incidentally, this is the author of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christiane Robbins which you tidied up; for some reason he listed it at WP:REFUND#Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christiane Robbins, though it has not been deleted: I have told him to notice the comments, work on it, and click "Resubmit" when it is ready. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:09, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, weirdness all the way through. Dlohcierekim 00:19, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Ghost Booster[edit]

hi.. why ghost booster page has been deleted??? im adding references but it was deleted

--DarKane (talk) 23:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Makes no assertion of significance. I generally restore on request. Will move to Articles for Creation Dlohcierekim 23:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
@DarKane: Now at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ghost Booster. Please review WP:MUSIC and the WP:GNG. Once you have the thing reliably sourced so that it meets notability requirements, you can submit for review. Dlohcierekim 23:37, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
@Dlohcierekim: i added more references.. can the page be submitted for review now?
@DarKane: I think you need more, more significant coverage. I don't think what is there is sufficient to assure the reviewers will accept. Books, reviews in major papers. The article does not show them meeting WP:MUSIC. You will need verifiable sources showing they meet that. I see nothing on RollingStone or BillBoard. The criterion for accepting an AfC is 50% likelihood of surviving an WP:AFD discussion, and I don't see the subject passing that bar. Dlohcierekim 00:29, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
@Dlohcierekim: look this page Folkstone for example.. there are no references, no coverage, no information... nothing... why this page has been accepted on wikipedia??
@DarKane:Thanks. Fixed. Dlohcierekim 00:48, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Kalmyk horse?[edit]

Someone deleted Kalmyk horse again. I didn't see a tag or an RfD discussion? Did I miss something, and can you restore again? Montanabw(talk) 22:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

@Montanabw: See Special:Undelete/Kalmyk_horse. No. That would be wheel warring. I cannot reverse another admin's action, especially if I agree with it. The article was deleted (again) per WP:CSD#G7, per creator request, by Yunshui (talk · contribs). The next step is to ask them. Dlohcierekim 00:00, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Fair enough. Would it be possible for you to userfy the deleted version in my user space for me? Something like Montanabw/Kalmyk horse? That way, I can review the source material and figure out if it's something I want to recreate (thus if I am the creator, a SCD#G7 would be my call, I'd presume Montanabw(talk) 19:33, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
it would probably be best to ask user:Yunshui Pinging @Yunshui: Dlohcierekim 02:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
All yours, Montanabw. Bear in mind, though, that since it's a recreation of User:Ancientsteppe's original article, you won't be able to G7 it (although U1 would probably be accepted). Yunshui  09:22, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Understood, can you userfy it into a sandbox for me per my suggestion above? Montanabw(talk) 20:20, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Deletion police is after me[edit]

Hello Dloh, You might want to join in to Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2014_February_18#Talk:JUSTIN_DREW_BIEBER discussion. The DRV case is about the talk page, but few people are also objecting to my R3 deletion of JUSTIN DREW BIEBER redirect. Since you have deleted this in past as CSD R3 as well, I thought you might want to comment on this. jni (delete)...just not interested 07:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

@Jni: ridiculous. Why do we need an all caps redirect? Is WilyD not the person raking you over the coals earlier at WP:WT:CSD and WP:AN/I? Dlohcierekim 23:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
I don't remember any interaction with him before. We don't have a common history or past disputes and I have no personal grudge against him. But I do take offense on nuisance processes that are started over technicalities. It is getting hard to do ordinary cleanup work in today's Wikipedia because of all those "process is important" folks arguing about minute details in this or that forum. jni (delete)...just not interested 08:58, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

The Little Flames[edit]

You refused a speedy deletion, but only one member has any notability. The others are either redirects, or links to a music website. If you're unwilling to speedy it, I'll have to PROD it instead. Even the article itself says the band didn't come to much! Sionk (talk) 00:46, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Feel Free. Asserts significance. Was a precursor band to a band we have an article on, so a redirect might be in order. If only one member has notability, that's a claim to significance. You might want to AfD. You seem to have a problem with me declining this speedy with an obvious claim to significance, a lower standard than notability? Like there's something wrong with declining a speedy deletion? Dlohcierekim 01:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

french article[edit]

Heres a machine translation;

There was a time a man not quite like the others, an unusual character multifaceted whose fragments have often illuminated our Berry sky. Roger Barbat, Castelroussin original also radiates the aura through a prestigious career which led to travel the world. International illusionist always surrounded Panthers from 1957 to 1980 he attracted crowds departing stereotypes, rising to the top of the poster for the show business in his specialty. In 1963 he was awarded the circus Amar rightly "Oscar Circus." Its success grew on the slopes of the stars across Europe and the most prestigious theaters, including Vienna in 1977, through the Swiss cabarets famous: the "Moulin Rouge" in Geneva and "Tabaris" Lausanne who offer him acclaim. Curious by nature, is a jack-of-all-and between 1990 to 2000, he had the brilliant idea to put his passion for drawing in the service of Haute Couture. It becomes costume-designer and then collaborates with fashion Thierry Mugler. His artistic creations Swarovski crystals will be exported to the Middle East and more particularly to the UAE with its beautiful paintings adorn the windows of prestige and the Palace of the Maharajah. Then his life took a turn more unexpected, in 2004 he was faced with the blockbuster saga "The Lord of the Rings", which "borrowed" his artist name created in 1957: "The White Wizard" . He will defend its intellectual property for three long years ... Last part of the date of his eventful life, he became a writer, and in October 2013 he published his memoirs open in a book entitled: "Most High God", the second part of his biography. He reveals his experiences along the beyond, mingled his adventures and passions while readers benefit from his knowledge gained over time. It will be on the show "The Soaring Books" on 12 and 13 April 2014.

its more of a CSD A7, thanks Reedman72 (talk) 01:23, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

chacun à son goût. A7 it is. Dlohcierekim 01:27, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Mahesh Desai was accepted[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Mahesh Desai, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hasteur (talk) 01:59, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Bradley C.S. Watson was accepted[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Bradley C.S. Watson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:43, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Please take another look at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Whited00r[edit]

I wasn't the person who created Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Whited00r but I've worked on it since it was deleted. I agree that the original article had too many "spammy" links, but now there's a more reasonable number. Other people have worked on it too. I've submitted it to the "articles for creation" process a couple times, and (after waiting nearly a month each time) it was hastily rejected. First because there were too many links, later because there were not enough links! Here's a discussion I had where the rejecting moderators now give half-hearted endorsements: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:APerson#AfC_submission_Whited00r

One thing's for sure: it's not going to get improved if it's not visible in the main Wikipedia space. Thanks! Mackerm (talk) 05:04, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

HTML error in your sig[edit]

Hi! While participating in a conversation you were in, I noticed that you had a nesting error in your signature. Specifically, you start a <b> (''') element without ever closing it. Here's your current signature, with the offending tag colored:

[[User:Dlohcierekim| <font color="#00ff00"> Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#bb00bb">cierekim''' </font>]]

And here's a version of your sig with the HTML errors removed:

<font color="#00FF00">[[User:Dlohcierekim|Dloh]]</font><font color="#BB00BB">'''[[User talk:Dlohcierekim|cierekim]]'''</font>

And how it looks:

Dlohcierekim

Thank you very much! APerson (talk!) 20:49, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment[edit]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Christopher Karas[edit]

Heya Dloh! Draft:Christopher Karas is back. We previously bonded over this. I think I advised you to keep your mucosa in good health. This may hinder that. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:17, 17 June 2014 (UTC)