User talk:Dolovis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dolovis (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

The block is unwarranted. There is no disruptive editing or sock-puppetry. CheckUser evidence was inconclusive. The instigating editor, who lives in the same city as me, has an admitted, demonstrable and long-term COI with me. Pursuant to Wikipedia:Blocking policy, blocks are to be used only to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, and my editing has done niether. Dolovis (talk) 18:40, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I disagree with a couple of comments you have made:
  1. checkuser evidence suggests that it is  Likely you have abused multiple accounts,
  2. looking at your block log, there are several blocks, by different admins.
In this context, I'm declining your request to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 11:44, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page for as long as you are blocked.

Nomination of Jordan Subban for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jordan Subban is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Subban until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --K.Annoyomous (talk) 06:41, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Joseph LaBate for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph LaBate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph LaBate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --K.Annoyomous (talk) 06:47, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Paul Cabana for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Cabana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Cabana until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --K.Annoyomous (talk) 07:01, 22 October 2014 (UTC)