User talk:Doniago

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Thank you, Don and I think I resolved it with your helpful suggestions !![edit]

Thank you, Don for being patient and helpful in your kind suggestions - I went back and reviewed my research - I emailed the director of the music video who confirmed each of Slipknot's bandmembers' character portrayal of the respective characters in the film The Shining - I also added the correct date as to when the source was published (which I forgot to do first time sorry). It now reads with more clarity. The musical artist did receive a Grammy nomination for their video work. Thank you again for taking the time to being willing to politely and professionally educate those of us who are trying hard to work within the guidelines and add to the awesomeness that is Wiki !!! Cheers and happy weekend, Steve

track listing on Godzilla[edit]

Hi. I was wondering what section of the MOS you were referring to on the Godzilla 2014 page for removing the tracks? Alaney2k (talk) 15:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

MOS:FILM#Soundtrack - "Track listings for film scores are generally discouraged since the score is usually composed by one person and the score's tracks are generic descriptions of scenes from the film. Noteworthy tracks from the film score can be identified and discussed in prose." DonIago (talk) 15:27, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. Wasn't sure where to look. Alaney2k (talk) 18:23, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
No problem! Happy editing! DonIago (talk) 18:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

John Holmes[edit]

Hello, I got the information from Dawn Schiller's Facebook page. Dawn was one of John's exes and she was also friends with Sharon. Can I use an FB page as a citation though? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.188.73.197 (talk) 10:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm not really sure whether Facebook constitutes a reliable source for this sort of information. I'd check at the link. There's also a noticeboard for sources if you need additional guidance. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 12:57, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
96 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Bajoran (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
63 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Facejacker (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
312 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Nyota Uhura (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
11 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Herbert Franklin Solow (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
303 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C The '90s Are All That (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
16 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Fantasy in the Sky (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
1,012 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Sookie Stackhouse (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
1,898 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA George Takei (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cleanup
89 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA Nebulae in fiction (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
7 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Tony Salmons (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
25 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Call to Arms (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
16 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Robin Renucci (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
78 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Select Bus Service (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
858 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C The Omen (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
279 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Ferengi (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
792 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Efficient-market hypothesis (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 2.0 Merge
286 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Chronic venous insufficiency (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
23 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Organian (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
73 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Ben Curtis (actor) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
2,459 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Wikify
233 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Green Goblin in other media (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub 2009 Chittoor shootout (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Ad Durub (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Aingiri (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
30 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub 58 Minutes (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
15 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Strange Fire (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
8 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Bernard McKenna (writer) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
13 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Desson Thomson (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
16 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Things Past (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
623 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Milana Vayntrub (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:05, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Question about June 2013 MOS change[edit]

Hey Doniago, I was researching an addition about Parental Ratings to MOS:TV and noticed that you added the final text here. Your summary, "add Parental ratings per Talk". I've noticed some backlash at List of programs broadcast by Adult Swim and I was hoping to track down the discussion that led to this change, for my edification. Can you help me out? Much obliged, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:23, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Here you go! DonIago (talk) 04:33, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Much obliged, thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:56, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Hey there![edit]

Meissen-teacup pinkrose01.jpg Hi! If you remember me, I was the editor in the GMMSF Box-Office Entertainment Awards who was asking for a comment as seen here. Would you mind if you take a look at its talk page again while drinking a cup of tea? I posted another question...uhhm... more like a request, maybe? Thank you so much! 001Jrm (talk) 06:07, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the tea! I've replied at the RFC. DonIago (talk) 12:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

IMDB[edit]

Thanks for the pointer about the IMDB policy. I was not aware of that. Banjohunter (talk) 01:38, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

No problem! Happy editing! DonIago (talk) 12:27, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

96.249.205.46[edit]

Hi. You wrote on User talk:96.249.205.46 that their edit contained original research. I believe you must have misread the edit, as "critical acclaim" is just another (nicer even?) way of writing "highly positive reviews", and doesn't actually change the essence of the article. The article in question (The Sixth Sense) would be better to not contain either phrase, and simply let the facts speak for themselves. —WOFall (talk) 03:35, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Actually, this has been discussed at WT:FILM and the consensus at the time was that a statement such as "critical acclaim" is a stronger assertion than "highly positive reviews", and as such it should be sourced if it's going to be used. Highly positive reviews can be substantiated via Rotten Tomatoes or such; critical acclaim implies a higher degree of reception. Cheers! DonIago (talk) 03:47, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
That's surprising, but so long as there's no misunderstandings. Thanks. —WOFall (talk) 13:10, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
No problem! If it's a concern for you, you're welcome to discuss it at WT:FILM. DonIago (talk) 13:12, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:MMFF[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:MMFF. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
92 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Deep Space Nine (space station) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
301 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Star Trek: The Animated Series (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
387 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Mammoth Cave National Park (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
94 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Bon Secours Sisters (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
15 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Archon II: Adept (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
581 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Vulcan (Star Trek) (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
125 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start XDA Developers (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
84 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Frankenstein in popular culture (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
1,107 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Home Improvement (TV series) (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
61 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Blitz: The League II (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
55 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Jeri Taylor (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
314 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Christopher Pike (Star Trek) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
381 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Vibranium (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
3,016 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Uzbekistan (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Unencyclopaedic
315 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Big Thunder Mountain Railroad (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
68 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Aeroscraft (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
18 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub PowerPlay (technology) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
171 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Old San Juan, Puerto Rico (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
177 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Allan Hyde (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
10 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Philip Coolidge (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
155 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Fantasmic! (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
35 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub BeamNG.drive (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
7 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Samsung Galaxy Core Advance (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub André Conde (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
37 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Brain Dead (film) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
6 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Plotting (video game) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
106 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Builders of the Future (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
22 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Happy (Ashanti song) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
238 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Fever (The Black Keys song) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Édouard Ferrand (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:20, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello - RE: The 'Anthony Rapp' page edit[edit]

Hi Doniago,
Thanks for explaining to me the issue about adding comments/explanation when editing a wiki page, I'm new to wiki editing so I appreciate the info. About the edit I made on Anthony Rapp's page, I changed the section saying he was "one of the first openly gay men on broadway" to "one of the first openly queer men" due to him identifying as specifically queer rather than gay in the interview posted beneath that. I also checked the citations next to the "openly gay" part and saw that there was no mention of him stating he was gay, rather the writers of said articles mislabeling him as such.
I just checked his page and saw the clarification edited, I think that looks a lot better than the previous sentence just saying he was openly gay, so thank you for the edit. I would like to just change the part where it says "others have called him" to "others have mislabeled him as..." since it seems like a more accurate description.

Fair enough. As long as the information in the article matches what's said in the sources I'm happy. Thanks for getting in touch! DonIago (talk) 12:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

re The_Farnsworth_Parabox[edit]

The The_Farnsworth_Parabox page has conflicting information. The summary on the right lists the episode as being Season four, Episode 10. The main article says that it is the "fifteenth episode of the fourth production season". The main article is correct and the summary should be updated to say Season 4, Episode 15.

Fixed Looks good to me now; please let me (or ideally the article's Talk page) know if you spot any other problems, and thanks for bringing this to my attention! Also, please note that new Talk page threads should generally be placed at the bottom of the page. Thanks again! DonIago (talk) 22:01, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

In popular culture items[edit]

Your understanding of community consensus is incorrect. Popcult items which are straightforeward description are sourced by the media item (book, film, etc.) which they refer to. Only those items which stray into analysis or interpretation need to be sourced. PLease do not continue to edit war over an incorrect understand of what is a non-mandatory guideline and not a policy. BMK (talk) 21:17, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Actually, it seems to me that if you ignore the bold, revert, discuss process then you're the one edit-warring...it also seems to me it would be best to get a consensus rather than lecturing me about whether my interpretation is correct. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 22:04, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Please note that I didn't "lecture" you until your second revert of a legitimate -- i.e. not a "Bold" -- edit. BMK (talk) 22:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
To clarify, those items were all in the Hudson Heights, Manhattan article, and have been for a long time. I moved them to Fort Tryon Park and The Cloisters because Hudson Heights was not the proper article for them, so there was no boldness involved, just simple editing. BMK (talk) 22:59, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
The context helps, and thank you for providing that, but I still don't agree with your view on adding pop culture items without secondary sourcing (barring certain minimalist statements, but I think we can both agree that's not what these are). I think it would be best if we wait for additional editors to offer their perspective. DonIago (talk) 12:41, 10 July 2014 (UTC)