User talk:Doveanupam

December 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Raveena Tandon, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jim1138 (talk) 08:58, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm TheJJJunk. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Jiroemon Kimura seemed less than neutral to me, so it was removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 00:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Shobhna Samarth, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 13:22, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 23:44, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Do not add comments such as this and this to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a messageboard or fansite and such comments are not constructive editing. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 16:55, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 4 February[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of Japanese supercentenarians page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of the verified oldest women. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Stop adding opinions/comments to main pages! DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 22:08, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of oldest living people, you may be blocked from editing. Edits like this have no place in Wikipedia. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 17:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous Woman[edit]

Hello Doveanupam, where did you get the name of the anonymous woman from Tokyo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coyote7798 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Emma Morano, you may be blocked from editing. Inception2010 (talk) 21:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Doveanupam. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016[edit]

DO NOT add commentary/opinions like this to articles. Wikipedia is not a messageboard or forum. If you persist you can expect more severe warnings. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 16:58, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Emma Morano. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Marbe166 (talk) 13:01, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Emma Morano. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 10:41, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of oldest living people. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 21:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As all previous warnings have not worked...[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 07:55, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing as per the warnings on this page and this ANI thread. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 12:16, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You people especially Derby county in Nz are absolutely wrong. If you see my edits carefully they have not been disruptive. As far as the oldest living people article is considered I have been editing it regularly just to update it to the present date. I have never thought of vandalizing any wiki article. Thank You.Doveanupam (talk) 16:19, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In a way Iam happy I wanted to close my wiki account. But since now Iam blocked I request someone to please cancel my account.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Doveanupam (talk • contribs) 17:45, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock-I would not do pointless edits again[edit]

Please I request Wiki administrators to Unblock me.I promise that I would not disrupt any wiki article and would not do any pointless edits.Please please please Iam extremely sorry for my past behaviour and I promise Iam not going to repeat these mistakes in future.Doveanupam (talk) 19:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]