User talk:Dp76764

WP:UTM
WP:BLP
Image placeholders
Link Checker

Try to stay in the top three sections of this hierarchy.

Okay, I'll bite: why?

Why?

September 2011

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Herbert (Family Guy). Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 20:36, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Reverting vandalism is an exemption to 3RR, which I'm fairly certain is what this was. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:09, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Indeed. The material repeatedly added isn't exactly blatant vandalism, but since it's the only material added by the other user, despite warnings on their talk page, I contend that it's vandalism. What else does one call a campaign to insert unsourced nonsense into an article? DP76764 (Talk) 23:34, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

South Park revision

Hi. I made a change to South Park#Political and corrected what seemed to be mix-up of words. I also made a comment on the talk page a month in advance. You undid the revision stating that the original wording "seems" to be correct. Since you didn't elaborate or comment on the talk page I can't say I'm convinced that you are right. Could you please respond to my comment? Ddnixx (talk) 10:11, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Philip J. Fry

Since you commented on my recent request to rename Professor Farnsworth, I'm notifying you about the rename of Fry, feel free to comment: Talk:Philip_J._Fry#Rename. CTJF83 06:43, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

StarWars Changes

It was not my intention to attack him. I was responding to his dismissal of me as a 'created user' solely existing as a 'new voice' to support against his viewpoint. Jcforge (talk) 06:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Diablo II

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Diablo II: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you for helping to protect articles from vandals. -- Fyrefly (talk) 10:50, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Indeed (see the top of this talk space). I tend to use them less frequently for 1-off, drive-by vandals though; people who edit once, enjoy the laugh they get out of it and then leave. Persistent vandals, on the other hand, get warnings. DP76764 (Talk) 18:42, 4 January 2012 (UTC)