User talk:Dsteel2012

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Dsteel2012, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Hotel Vendome(novel). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Piandcompany (talk) 01:08, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sunset At St. Tropez.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sunset At St. Tropez.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 13:07, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Aaron Booth. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Roshon Fegan, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aaron Booth (talk) 16:44, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Birth (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Glazer's direction, ''Birth'' received mixed reviews.<ref>http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/birth/]</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:25, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Trump. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. There is consensus on the talk page not to list Trump's claimed net worth as his actual net worth, given that reliable sources do not support it and the FEC filing itself does not contain net worth information. Please discuss this on the talk page rather than reverting. ~ RobTalk 12:48, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Donald Trump ‎. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kuru (talk) 12:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted you twice for disruptive edits to Donald Trump (net worth issue) on August 16, 2015. Please go to the article's Talk page for discussion of this subject before editing further. Thank you. — Vesuvius Dogg (talk) 01:46, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]