User talk:Dwanyewest

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Talk page archive
User talk:Dwanyewest/Archive/2008-2011


Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk 12:06, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey[edit]

NPPbarnstar.jpg

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Dwanyewest! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Tommi Ohrner[edit]

Hi there. I see you've started a page for Tommi Ohrner. I had wanted to start a page for him, but I'm an American Wikipedia editor and my German isn't very good. If you are German or if you are fluent in German and know of reliable sources about his life and career, please add the information and sources to the new page you've created, or you can add the information and links to this talk page (in English) and, between the two of us, I'm sure we could translate the information to add to his page. I'm afraid his page could be tagged for speedy deletion if we can't add more sources to verify his notability. Thank you --- Crakkerjakk (talk) 09:31, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Merge proposal[edit]

I proposed here the merge of Golden Generation and Golden Team. I would appreciate a comment Fraere (talk) 12:33, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Reply[edit]

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Crakkerjakk's talk page.

Talk page archived[edit]

I just took a look at his page and saw that he archives manually by just copy/pasting, so I went ahead and archived your talk page. I left the original "Welcome" message and kept the threads for October (so you could continue any conversations that might not be finished), but everything from 2010 thru September 2011 is now archived. A box with the link is now located at the top of this talk page. I hope that helps. If not, let me know and we'll make sure you get what you want. --- Crakkerjakk (talk) 18:48, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I just noticed that your talk page went back to 2008, not 2010. The top message was from an editor who mistakenly put their message on top of your older messages, so I'll move the page to reflect that it's an archive of 2008 to 2011. Sorry about that. --- Crakkerjakk (talk) 18:51, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Now moved to reflect the page archives messages from 2008 to 2011. --- Crakkerjakk (talk) 18:54, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life Begins for Andy Panda[edit]

With respects, your nomination rationale is not based upon policy nor guideline. While appreciating your concerns about an article being unsourced, topic notability is determined through availability of sources, and not their immediate citation within an article. In finding that multiple sources are readily available, and your concerns easily addressable, I began some steps myself to proactively address the addresable issues,[1] so I'm asking that you give serious consideration to a withdrawal of your nomination. Cheers, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:29, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Michael Woodford[edit]

Are you sure Woodford was born in Manchester, Connecticut, and that the city is in the UK? ;-) --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 01:29, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Edit summaries[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaffyBridge (talkcontribs) 18:32, January 13, 2012‎

I, too, wish to remind you on this, and don't mean to nag. I know you already know the right thing to do. SENATOR2029 talk 21:35, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Question for you[edit]

You seem to have tagged a couple of pages recently with {{Cleanup-link rot}} even though they don't have a link rot problem. (See the template's instructions for more information about the difference between displaying the text of a URL in a full bibliographic citation and being a true bare URL.) These articles are being discussed as examples at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals), if you're interested in sharing your thoughts on any of it. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:07, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

The Shield[edit]

I noticed your interest in this television series at Wikipedia_talk:Television_episodes#Shield_and_He-man_clean_up. I would like to call your attention to this list of the most critically acclaimed seasons and episodes that need articles: Wikipedia:TV-EPISODE#Important_articles_to_be_created.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:58, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

In response to your message[edit]

I'm glad you responded about Sam Malone. I wonder if you can discuss in those talk pages about Diane Chambers and Frasier Crane. I have problems with NetflixSoup's edits, and I don't want any more edit wars with that user. As for the series finale of Frasier, I'm not too sure. I have over 800 pages on my watchlist, including Templates and Files. --George Ho (talk) 10:09, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Re: List of Star Blazers episodes[edit]

Thanks for the feedback! I'm actually going right to the source to get episode summaries as accurate as possible (the episodes are archived on YouTube). The only parts I won't get are anything that was different in the US versus the Japanese versions. :) Wxkat (talk) 06:33, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Woody Interruptus#Merger Discussion[edit]

Merger to List of Cheers episodes#ep207 is proposed. Feel free to improve the consensus. --George Ho (talk) 02:50, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Why won't you ever insert a new category in alphabetical order?[edit]

It's not hard. --Niemti (talk) 14:20, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

And is it hard to write "Super Street Fighter IV" instead of "Streetfighter IV"? Whatever is "Streetfighter IV" anyway. Also, "the the five characters the five characters"? --Niemti (talk) 17:49, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Crime Story[edit]

I have attempted to have the discussion on the Crime Story talk page I have contacted the editor personally. As you can clearly see my edits had legimate sources from the Los Angeles Times and DVD Talk [2]. It seems to me merly to spiteful editing for the sake of doing so. What else do you want me to do when you accuse me of not listening to advise. Dwanyewest (talk) 12:42, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Context for the above: Dwanyewest, who appears to have a legitimate complaint, did not know where to go with that complaint, and posted the complaint several places where it was ignored or deleted (because it was in the wrong place). I gave him the following advice:
"Dwanyewest, first you need to attempt to resolve this at Talk:Crime Story (film). If that does not resolve the issue, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution for instructions as to what to do next."
Thirty minutes later, Dwanyewest posted his complaint to Talk:Crime Story (film) - the right place. Here is my further advice for him:

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Dwanyewest, I see that you have now posted your complaint to Talk:Crime Story (film). That is the right place to try to resolve issues with Crime Story (film). As I wrote before, you need to give the talk page discussion a chance. If it doesn't result in the issue being solved, let me know and I will tell you what the next step is.

Meanwhile, I see that 90.195.244.182 has been blocked for 24 hours for his disruptive editing at Crime Story (film), Full Metal Jacket, Lethal Weapon 4 and Big Show. This means two things for you: first, it means that you can go back to Crime Story (film) and make your edits without 90.195.244.182 being allowed to interfere. I see that you have already done that. Second, it means that 90.195.244.182 cannot edit Talk:Crime Story (film) either, so you will have to wait until the block expires to see whether you get a response.

I know that all of this must be very frustrating for you, and that it must seem like you are having trouble with a vandal and nobody is listening. You can reduce your frustration by following a few simple rules: First, any time you have a conflict with another editor, try to resolve the conflict on the talk page for the article where you are having trouble. Second, read Wikipedia:Dispute resolution so that you know what to do if discussing it on the talk page fails. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:10, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

It's pointless communicating with 90.195.244.182 s/he is clearly a disruptive troll I am taking my complaint higher as this person seems to be disruptive for the sake of doing so! Dwanyewest (talk) 14:01, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Why are you ignoring what I am telling you? "Taking your complaint higher" will do you no good unless you first try to resolve the issue at Talk:Crime Story (film). If you take your compaint elswhere before doing that, you will be told to go back and try to resolve the issue at Talk:Crime Story (film).
And please don't try to tell me that you tried and he did not respond. He can't respond while he is blocked. So far he got a 24-hour block, went right back to misbehaving, and immediately got a 48 hour block which s still active. If he doesn't stop his disruptive editing he will end up blocked indefinitely. The system is working. Please stop being so impatient and please stop WP:FORUMSHOPPING. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:34, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Bare links[edit]

Stop adding bare link URLs to articles, and then adding the linkrot template to the refs section, as if you expect other editors to clean up after you. ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 02:58, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Saber Rider cartoon syndication affiliates question[edit]

I do remember Saber Rider that aired on my channel Fox 5 WNYW station affilate at 6:00AM in the morning in my NYC along with affiliates are:

  • KTTV Fox 11 in Los Angeles, CA
  • WPWR-TV 50 in Chicago, IL
  • WGBS Philly 57 in Philadelphia, PA
  • KDAF Fox 33 in Dallas, TX
  • KBHK-TV 44 in San Francisco, CA
  • WSBK-TV 38 in Boston, MA
  • WVEU 69 in Atlanta, GA
  • WTTG Fox 5 in Washington, DC
  • KRIV Fox 26 in Houston, TX
  • WKBD-TV Fox 50 in Detroit, MI
  • KPHO-TV 5 in Phoenix, AZ
  • KTZZ 22 in Seattle, WA
  • KMSP-TV 9 in Minneapolis, MN
  • WBFS-TV 33 in Miami, FL

Do you remember the syndicated station affiliates of Saber Rider or you don't remember at all, because it hasn't update yet to put the old schedule between 1986-1989 from Classic TV on Radio-Info website? 74.72.39.176 (talk) 01:42, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

I don't know what stations Saber Rider was broadcast on in the United States as I was raised in the UKDwanyewest (talk) 01:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Then, ask the expert users to talk and discuss about on Saber Rider station affiliates. 74.72.39.176 (talk) 02:24, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Stared a debate on the Saber Rider talk page feel fee to contribute.Dwanyewest (talk) 02:47, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Cheers and Frasier task force[edit]

I have proposed one task force to cover Cheers and Frasier. Join in by clicking Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Cheers and Frasier task forces. --George Ho (talk) 03:49, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Merging Lilith Sternin into Frasier Crane?[edit]

Merger of two articles is proposed. Go to Talk:Frasier Crane to improve consensus. --George Ho (talk) 03:52, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

RE:Lilith[edit]

This doesn't say individually about Lilith as much as Frasier and Lilith together. This is excessive, as I have already done that in Frasier Crane article. This has awards, but I've already done that in Frasier article. ....Really? Even so, look at Lucy Ricardo and Ricky Ricardo. More to discuss. --George Ho (talk) 04:55, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

This is trivial, as Frasier and Lilith are mentioned together already in both Frasier and Lilith articles. On the other hand, this might do. --George Ho (talk) 05:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Only one article; the rest are struck out? Man, even that article could make Lilith Sternin belong to the upcoming List of Cheers characters (or Characters of Cheers). I'm sorry, but Lilith article could be either merged into Frasier article or renamed into Frasier Crane and Lilith Sternin. --George Ho (talk) 07:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Changing scope of Lilith Sternin without merging?[edit]

I have proposed altering the scope of this article. Well, you can go to the talkpage to improve consensus. --George Ho (talk) 08:23, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

British Muslims for Secular Democracy[edit]

Dear Dwanyewest, I hope you are well. Your work on the page, British Muslims for Secular Democracy, has really improved it a lot. It's a credible page now. Thanks. Its central section still seems to be (or read like) a constitution or charter and it seems from the citations that BMSD generated a bit of media attention when it originated, but not much since then. If you know of any third-party sources for its activities / accomplishments during the last five years we could really strengthen the article and demonstrate notability. I'll search myself, but anything you can think of will be much appreciated. Thanks again. Best wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 00:37, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

ostraction?[edit]

Hi I tried to do some clean-up but was thrown by "ostraction?" Is this ostracism? Insomesia (talk) 13:28, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

I miss pelt discrimination.Dwanyewest (talk) 13:31, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
You mean ostraction should be discrimination? Insomesia (talk) 13:35, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes i am sorry not proof reading my article properly. Dwanyewest (talk) 14:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)[edit]

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow

In this issue:

  • Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
  • Research: The most recent DR data
  • Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
  • Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
  • DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
  • Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
  • Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?
Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->

--The Olive Branch 19:00, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Hey I was wondering if you could help me.[edit]

I'm think of expanding your homophobia in ethnic minorities cultures. I want to start by creating one about Homophobia and Transphobia in the Jewish community. Would you be willing to help?-Rainbowofpeace (talk) 04:24, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

I will sent some links when I canDwanyewest (talk) 09:14, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the links I will try to start my article tommorow-Rainbowofpeace (talk) 09:42, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

About the Bruno films[edit]

Hey, Dwanyewest, slow down a bit. Make sure they are properly referenced before popping them up as articles. Just sayin'. --Shirt58 (talk) 11:29, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Terminal Bliss[edit]

Hi. I see you have been taking an interest in this. See WP:COIN#Jordan Alan and his films - your views on the other films, and your help to ensure that their articles are not spammed-up, welcome. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 23:38, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Do you think this has potential?[edit]

I can't remember if this subject has been brought up before. But do you think this article Prostitution in Ghana has potential to be expanded into a full solo article. Dwanyewest (talk) 22:43, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi there Dwanyewest, I do remember when you brought this subject to me, and I do think it could have potential. How about if you can start the article in any way you can, then I will try my best to contribute to the article. MarkMysoe (talk) 22:55, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

RM of Prostitution in the Palestinian territories[edit]

There's an RM at Talk:Prostitution in the Palestinian territories. I'm telling you this because you were involved in a move of that page. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 18:11, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Dwanyewest. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 20:33, 18 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Prostitution[edit]

You did not sign it but I suspect it was you who left a message on my talk page. Thanks I will look at it but there just so many pages on this topic. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 21:56, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Use of derviative works templates[edit]

As the creator of {{Adventures of Huckleberry Finn}}, {{The Adventures of Tom Sawyer}}, {{Great Expectations}} and {{David Copperfield}}, I thought you might be interested in the discussion about the use of derivative works templates in author bio articles at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels#Derivative works and cultural references templates.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:47, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Article notability notification[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Oasis (TV series), has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Oasis (TV series)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 22:15, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

=

Nomination of Money as Debt for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Money as Debt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Money as Debt (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

A matter is being discussed[edit]

...at the reliable sources noticeboard where you might wish to share an opinion. Thanks. Schmidt, Michael Q. 04:58, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

I want you to know you have been a big help on the articles of intersectionality on race and LGBT. Thank you so much.-Rainbowofpeace (talk) 15:06, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Use the merge template[edit]

--Niemti (talk) 12:23, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Felix Dexter[edit]

Hi, Dwanyewest. Hope you don't mind me asking. What was your source for Felix Dexter's date of birth? The same date now appears in the Telegraph and Guardian obituaries, but they might well have got it from us ... The Guardian obituary, written by two colleagues, even says that they didn't know how old he was (so the date must have been added by an editor, perhaps after reading the Wikipedia page). I was just about to write an obituary elsewhere, so it would be really helpful. Thanks. Andrew Dalby 09:12, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your answer. No need to apologise -- I know how these things happen! Andrew Dalby 13:38, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Happy New Year Dwanyewest![edit]

Fireworks in Jaén (cropped).jpg
Happy New Year!
Hello Dwanyewest:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Northamerica1000(talk) 09:45, 1 January 2014 (UTC)


Peace sign.svg


Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2014}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.


Merger[edit]

Hi Dwanyewest,I have merged the article Football in Budapest to Football in Hungary as per your merger proposal.Skr15081997 (talk) 13:11, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy[edit]

The criterion for speedy deletion is failure to indicate credible significance. Actual notability is a much higher standard, and not required to pass speedy. If you question the actual notability, use WP:AFD or WP:PROD. For Alexandar Komanov, I think a prod might be contested, so you should use AFD.See WP:CSD and WP:Deletion Policy. DGG ( talk ) 23:27, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Declined speedy[edit]

I had to decline the speedy on Ultimate Combat Experience. I really don't think that this is notable, but the article squeaks by notability standards because it asserts that UCE is broadcast in multiple countries. I've nominated it for deletion via PROD and given that your edit was the first one in years, I doubt that anyone will contest the PROD. If they do, feel free to take it to AfD. It's just that the television appearances/broadcasts push it just beyond the reach of speedy deletion. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:05, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

  • The same thing goes for TKO Major League MMA. I'll leave that one for you to PROD if you want. The problem with speedy deletions is that it can only be used in circumstances where there is absolutely nothing on the article that could show that coverage and notability could potentially exist. If something was broadcast on television, that generally makes it pass speedy criteria. It doesn't mean that it passes basic notability guidelines, but that's a whole other end of the spectrum. PROD is usually the best way to deal with articles such as this. (WP:PROD) If the PROD is removed, then it should go to AfD. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:08, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Discussion on a source for comics articles[edit]

Hi. Your opinion could be very useful in this discussion. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 12:49, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Spawn and Savage Dragon[edit]

Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:20, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Amazon Eve[edit]

In my haste to protect this article from IPs I think I reverted your edits at least once. If I did, I apologize. The changes you made are finally appropriate given the contents of the video you used as source. Before that it was all unsourced speculation and synthesis. So thanks. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:26, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletions[edit]

You have reinstated some proposed deletion templates. This is improper because these templates state emphatically, "If this template is removed, do not replace it." That's because this process is only to be used for uncontroversial deletion and so "must only be used if no opposition is to be expected." Please revert your action. Andrew (talk) 11:20, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Bundling[edit]

When you have a bunch of similar AfDs to start at once, consider bundling next time czar  15:17, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Bare urls tag[edit]

You have added this to a few articles on my watchlist recently, immediately after you introduced the bare urls to the article in the first place. In future you can save yourself and the rest of us a lot of time but putting square brackets around the url and copying and pasting the title from the website to which you are linking (if you're not sure how, leave a space between the url and the closing bracket then add in the title like so [url Title]). The references you are adding are good but it would be a lot more simple if you formatted them rather than tagging. Cheers. Keresaspa (talk) 02:17, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, you just added a redundant link to one and put in the linkrot tag. What's up with that?--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 06:33, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Task Force[edit]

Shouldn't you be a member of the sex work task force? In any case I would appreciate it if you could go to the talk page there and contribute to the discussion around use of words in the language of the country involved. Thanks. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 03:07, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Splitting[edit]

Hi West,

It's been a long time! I hope life has been going well with you since we were last in touch. This page gives a good explanation of how to undertake an article split. The splits you undertook are called cut-and-paste moves, which are prohibited on Wikipedia because they result in multiple page histories existing for the same topic. Because the articles were so recently created, I recommend that the new pages be deleted.

Neelix (talk) 02:00, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi West,
I've thought about the situation a bit more, and it's a difficult one to manage. Are you willing for the articles to be deleted? I don't have a grounds for speedy deletion unless you consent, and I think that's the most expedient way forward. The alternatives aren't great. In addition to the fact that cut-and-paste moves are time-consuming to deal with and can only be dealt with by administrators, I don't think these splits should have taken place. Many of the sources in the new articles aren't reliable (Buzzfeed, whatculture.com, etc.), and I don't think they justify individual articles. It seems like a lot of work to repair the cut-and-paste moves only to have the articles merged back into the list. What are your thoughts?
Neelix (talk) 02:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi West,
Thanks for your understanding. Once I've finished the deletions, I'd be glad to contribute to the split discussion you initiated.
Neelix (talk)
Hi West,
I've deleted the articles per your approval, and responded to your comments on the list talk page. What was the issue with the Miyamoto Usagi article? Was there a split there that I'm not seeing?
Neelix (talk) 02:54, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi West,
I can't find the original page history for the Miyamoto Usagi article; it may have been lost somehow. I think it's fine to leave it as it is, considering it happened so long ago and it looks like you had consensus for the split. Just be sure to avoid cutting and pasting in the future. Thanks again for contacting me about these splits.
Neelix (talk) 03:11, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi West,
I responded at the discussion you started. To summarize, I think it better to work on improving the list itself rather than spinning off more articles about individual characters.
Neelix (talk) 20:53, 5 September 2014 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Dwanyewest. You have new messages at PRehse's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nomination of Brea Bennett for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brea Bennett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brea Bennett (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Раціональне анархіст (talk) 04:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

1983 European Karate Championships[edit]

Please explain to me what is needed for 1983 European Karate Championships in formatting?--DThomsen8 (talk) 21:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)


DThomsen8 (talk) The 80kg male category is not properly formatted and has and has a row overhanging. Dwanyewest (talk) 04:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Irreligion in Denmark for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irreligion in Denmark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irreligion in Denmark until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:34, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Tim Stephens (karateka)[edit]

Hi there, there's a discussion going on at the BLP noticeboard regarding Tim Stephens. You might be interested in participating. Simonm223 (talk) 23:54, 27 February 2015 (UTC)