User talk:Dweller

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The Signpost
15 April 2015



Dougweller[edit]

Regarding what you state on your user page and at the top of your talk page about being mistaken for other editors, I was just wondering if you are a legitimate alternative account of Dougweller before I read that. I wondered if you were him after seeing you at Wikipedia:User pages on my WP:Watchlist. You must get mistaken for Dougweller often enough to have notes about it on your user page and talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 03:20, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, though it seems to happen less often these days, somehow. --Dweller (talk) 12:45, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Glad to hear that. I've used the Dweller alias for a long time, for obvious reasons. I'm also dweller @ ramtops.co.uk, a homage to Terry Pratchett. Dougweller (talk) 12:24, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Reverts[edit]

Why are you doing that? --Glovacki (talk) 09:16, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

You have no consensus for the mass changes you're making. --Dweller (talk) 09:25, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Ok, I will not change anything befor fully consensus, but does anybody opposite to changes like this? --Glovacki (talk) 09:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
  • I do not see any argument opposite it. --Glovacki (talk) 09:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Step by step[edit]

Let us move slowly. First, do you agree, that Category:Schools by religious affiliation because Category:Jewish schools is already in Category:Religious schools? --Glovacki (talk) 10:18, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Start a discussion at WT:JUDAISM. --Dweller (talk) 10:19, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Deletion of Category:Schools by religious affiliation is not related with WT:JUDAISM --Glovacki (talk) 10:53, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
True. Then start a discussion in an appropriate place within the Cat pages, and place notices on the affected WikiProjects' pages. --Dweller (talk) 11:01, 31 March 2015 (UTC)


Celebrate[edit]

Clownscloudsblahblah Yoor Know Phool
Have a humorous day filled with lots of PHUN on this April Fools Day 2015. Any annoyance is purely coincidental.   Bfpage |leave a message  21:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. But you do know that after noon the joke's on you? --Dweller (talk) 09:02, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Challenge[edit]

Hi Dweller. You have a new challenge. Enjoy! -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 10:18, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Kantipur Gurkhas (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
1,105 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Entropy (information theory) (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub The Neck, Newfoundland and Labrador (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Back Cove, Newfoundland and Labrador (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
1,092 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA Mumbai Indians (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Pond Cove, Newfoundland and Labrador (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
14 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Yosef Hayyim (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub St. Veronica's, Newfoundland and Labrador (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
390 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Dion Dublin (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
42 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B 1993–94 in English football (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
18 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start NanoBook (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
215 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Eating (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
453 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Liposuction (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
26 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start King's Academy (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
561 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Sprezzatura (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Southeast Bight, Newfoundland and Labrador (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
16 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Doria-Pamphili-Landi (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
11 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Paddle scoop (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
114 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: Start History of the West Indian cricket team (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Bladelets (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
427 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Rabbi (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Wikify
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Wooddale, Newfoundland and Labrador (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Woodville, Newfoundland and Labrador (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Peter Allen (physician) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Loch Lomond, Newfoundland and Labrador (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
9 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub ICC Academy (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
10 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Mohammad Reza Nekoonam (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Eastern Point, Newfoundland and Labrador (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
49 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Eagle Bay, Newfoundland and Labrador (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:26, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

MFD[edit]

You liked that close, didn't you? I had to take a real bird's eye view over everything a few times before I figured out a way that could makes everyone's point viable and still gives a resolution. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:39, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

I liked the way you explained yourself. And the fact that you did. --Dweller (talk) 09:24, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry i was such a jerk![edit]

2601:7:6580:5E3:44:7ED6:F7B4:B624 (talk) 15:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Not sure who you are, or what you've done, but if it was something you did in article space, please undo it or don't do it again. If it was something personal to me, I'm sure it wasn't a problem and thank you. --Dweller (talk) 22:41, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
No I just got all upset on reference desk. I'm sorry. Rich Peterson.2601:7:6580:5E3:742B:A107:5621:8658 (talk) 05:29, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Oh don't worry about that. I think I was slightly too sniffy in my comment and probably deserved it. Kind of you to apologise. I'm sorry for being less helpful than usual, too. --Dweller (talk) 09:16, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your comment[edit]

Although it is generally not a good idea to do so, I slightly tweaked your comment because it could have been read as "oppose ThaddeusB" instead of "oppose removal". Naturally, if you did mean if something else, please revert me and refactor for clarity. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:43, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Good work! --Dweller (talk) 15:05, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Apologies...[edit]

... if I came across as short on AN this morning, it wasn't my intention. I'd certainly be interested to know why you asked which bureaucrat gave the information, as I've said the same thing a large number of times to different blocked users. WormTT(talk) 13:42, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Apology more than accepted. I'm having an interesting time IRL and my reply (replies?) could have been less obscure. I was trying to discover two things: if the enquiry was recent and/or with a global renamer. I'm particularly keen as I've seen some on and offwiki discussions about our RTV policy, and how it's been affected by the downgrading of Crats' renaming rights. We actually urgently need to sort this out as it's something of an anomaly. --Dweller (talk) 16:12, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

United Synagogue[edit]

Hey there D, I'm wondering if you can help me make sense of whatever the edit war is on United Synagogue. The English seems less than optimal and the TL;DR style of the edit request (I declined as unclear) has me befuddled. Internetwikier (the one with the edit request) is clearly an WP:SPA trying to add content to the article that he feels is appropriate and properly sourced - albeit negative in nature. I think he's going for a WP:NOTCENSORED addition to the article which would possibly be appropriate. Mike Schwartz613 keeps reverting these additions (perhaps because they feel they WP:OWN the article or something, I'm not sure. Mike does have three years and 70ish edits more experience (56 for Iw to 124 for MS). Bellezzasolo seems to have also contributed to a talk page discussion (signed as an IP accidentally) on it and seems to understand the content that is trying to be added. Since you're the admin that protected this page, I was hoping you would be willing to work with me to figure out the best course of action. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 12:53, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

___


Hi there, both of you. Apologies for not knowing the correct syntax for getting both your attentions at the same time, but I wanted to get you both involved in the United Synagogue page 'edit war' that is currently underway between myself (I.W) and Mike Schwartz613.

I have tried my best, in keeping with other religious organizational website entries on wikipedia, to keep all criticisms to those that are 1) interdependently made, 2) verifiable and sourced by respectable news organizations / historians and 3) have at every stage agreed that a section be ascribed to 'refuting' the 'accusations' (or historically documented facts, as my many , many, sources see it). Mike Schwartz613 however is engaged in simple censorship. To aid your understand of the structure of my attempted additions, please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Board_of_Deputies_of_British_Jews which is another pseudo-political-religious organization that has garnered criticisms due to the materials and viewpoints it espouses being criticized for 'overstepping' the line between religious guidance and overt political speech, designed to push a viewpoint which not all subscribe to.

My attempt is to ADD information, not 'censor'. Please assist.

And again, apologies for 'crashing' this space, I'm an infrequent user of Wikipedia (financial contributor nonetheless) and wish to share my knowledge of the issue at hand. I.W

_____

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.54.211 (talk) 20:58, 19 April 2015 (UTC)