User talk:Dylanfromthenorth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Dylanfromthenorth's TALK PAGE
Reply policy: I'll usually reply to any messages on this page to keep the discussion all in one place, and leave a talkback ping on your talkpage

Holiday cheer[edit]

Christmas tree.svg Holiday Cheer
Michael Q. Schmidt my talk page is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings.

Interview for The Signpost[edit]

This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Orphanage

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Orphanage for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (indicate) @ 18:30, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Speed Deletion[edit]

Therefore, they have released my created page for deletion I would now like to explain why it is important to give this person a Wikipedia page here. There is much interest in him and there are certainly people who like to more about this information would inform him at least the most important I have listed on Wikipedia. I have all kinds of relevances fulfilled as I have seen so there is no reason this person no Wikipedia page to enter. I call here's an example, namely the Wikipedia page of "Adrian von Ziegler" is constructed exactly like that of me. Both composers have become YouTube by "Famous". Usertalk:Demise21 06:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Demise. I based my speedy deletion request for Sadžid Husić on an unsuccessful search for sources. Wikipedia has quite strict guidelines on who is eligible for a Wikipedia article, and the minimum requirement is that they have been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sourcesthat are independent of the subject. If you have some available, great, but they'll need to be attached to the article. I included some links on your talkpage that provide more information on all this :-) Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 07:17, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
He You just said that I have created this page about myself so what is wrong. As I have already mentioned above, the sides of me and the same, there are of "Adrian von Ziegler" no difference between the two the relevance criteria of "Adrian von Ziegler" are even worse than me.Please note that there is a person here is in it also goes to a Public Interest.I think we should at least give the person a Wikipedia page by the people can inform themselves need the information. I have also listed above the same if someone even more relevant is left like they can import. Usertalk:Demise21 07:27, 19 November 2014
Oops, yeah, I used the wrong template, you can ignore that I said you created an article about yourself ;-)
I'm not familiar with the Adrian von Ziegler article, and in any case the fact that one thing has an article doesn't mean another thing should; see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS for more on that. The main thing is for you to add sources to the article, that's the main hurdle to get over. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 07:42, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Can pass no problem as I said I have since also added links to the relevant Wikipedia page which lead to relenvate pages.It's just a matter that I am one of the persons of interest it has more information about him so to get the composer (am a fan of him) unfortunately I have to realize that it article is here almost or did not get the relevance criteria after.I have it here on my articles I have written some referred to the statements about the person something.As I said above I have on the page above added the other that can also deal with his person the other links be added.Maybe I do not have many links packed into it but i think that could change if the products are the remains soon as there are certainly many people are still working on this article.Usertalk:Demise21 07:51, 19 November 2014
Yeah the links that are in the article right now aren't up to the standard I'm afraid - see WP:SOURCES for the kind of thing needed; they have to be independent of the subject (so, not things like Facebook); in-depth (so, brief mentions aren't good enough), and from reliable sources (so, newspapers and books etc, not blogs or Twitter). Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:10, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
The Facebook I understand that we can remove all the stuff're only 2 things and since it came on the information. But iTunes does so as a German media journal which publishes an article about him but should be relevant enough I think. The Dusseldorf Evening Gazette is not a blog, so this should be valid as relevance. CDBaby and a website where you can buy the music of him I think you can accept as the relevance least shows that he offers his music on the Internet for sale.Usertalk:Demise21 08:20, 19 November 2014
The only one of the links currently on the page that is acceptable is the Dusseldorf Evening Gazette one - you need more like that, from different sources. Just having music on the internet for sale doesn't show notability; neither does having a YouTube channel. Even I've got both of those and I shouldn't have a Wikipedia article either! Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:34, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Ok then give me some time and I will find more links. That should not be a problem, I see my mistake a I did something wrong in the relevance criteria and I will immediately mending I need just a little time for the I still find more articles.Usertalk:Demise21 08:38, 19 November 2014
If you intend to add more references, go to the page and click 'Contest this speedy deletion'; I can't remove the template once it's up there. Have a read of WP:BLP and WP:RELIABLE for guidance on adding info to the article. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:48, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
So I have now added more products myself have looked again if the relenvanz it is sufficient that she does.I certainly hope that I have thus met the relevance criteria for the page so that it gets released.I will of course personally about the ever more relevant articles are added worry soon as I find something.But I'm going to give me trouble.Usertalk:Demise21 09:35, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

You met a sock of RealMadridCF2012. All the "sources" are created by himself. See Sadzid Husic. --Yoda1893 (talk) 23:22, 21 November 2014 (UTC)


I'd like to point out that banned and blocked users do not need to have a completed SPI to remove the comment itself [[1]]. I plan on reverting you in a little bit provided you don't have a reason to believe that I'm wrong in my assessment. The behaviors and language is the same as previous socks and as I mentioned at the SPI the only reason I filed the SPU was to check and make sure we didn't have a new farm growing. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 03:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

The SPI is closed with no further action to be taken, they said themselves that it could just as likely be a result of canvassing, or a meat. Closing admins aren't dumb, they'll take into account that it's an SPA, whatever the reason for it being an SPA is. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 04:09, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
I don't think they are stupid but the meatpuppetry policy also explicitly deals with it [[2]] where it states that in cases of doubt to treat them the same way as per the finding of this arbcom case [[3]]. That's two seperate cases, I am waiting on a clarifying comment but it is still my intention to revert it when I have that comment based off of WP:EVADE. Sorry but my good faith for this person completely left when they tried saying I have ties to the KKK. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 04:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
I had the clarification I needed and it was that it was ok to remove it, before I do that I want to ask, do you have any reason to believe it's not a sock or was this just AGF? Hell in a Bucket (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Neither really. I'm sure it's someone who's up to some flavour of no good, but thought it would be better to leave the comment up and let the closing admin decide its validity, while still giving them the info. I'm not particularly attached to the comment though, and (deliberately) don't involve myself in too much sockpuppetry stuff (life's stressful enough!), so feel free to re-remove it if that's what the protocol is. :-) Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 14:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Ok thank you, I am fairly involved with the sock puppet investigation side of things as I do new page patrol and they seem to pop up often there. I just wanted to make sure so I didn't dig myself or anyone else a hole we don't need to fill lol. Cheers. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 14:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

FYI mentioned your comments[edit]

FYI mentioned your comments at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bambolinaz, please feel free to participate there. — Cirt (talk) 07:26, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 12 December[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 13 December 2014 (UTC)