User talk:E:Y,?:G
--e:Y,?:G 06:18, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
|
e:Y,?:G 06:17, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Photon from electron Graviton from where. Gravity is the equilibrium force between energy and matter as a result of Newton first law and Einstein's formula[edit]
I meant to use the user ID: e:Y,?:G the letter e not E and where Y is for photon and G is for Graviton. The e symbol for electron but Wikipedia put user ID as E:Y,?:G instead?E:Y,?:G (talk) 05:17, 3 September 2010 (UTC) if Graviton exist, then at least we know that all matter (all particles) could emit and absorbs Gravitons. Could the orbitals and their energy's around the atom's nucleus would be a clue to the energy's interactions of Graviton function form. Since electromagnetic photon has sine or wave form mathematical function, could the Graviton mathematical function form be different and follows the orbits energies between the nucleus and the electrons orbiting of the atom in a define mathematical function? The mass or masses of the proton or protons in the atom nucleus generates or give rise to the orbits and their energy's around the nucleus of an atom. The orbits and their energy's specifications are positions in space and time where a graviton (or graviton mathematical function) would be "receptive" to have, or to interact with another mass (this mass is an electron since no other mass could occupy the orbital of the nucleus of an atom. Vacuum energy's probably has an important role in the space and time position of a particle. E:Y,?:G (talk) 22:22, 2 September 2010 (UTC)E:Y,?:G (talk) 22:23, 2 September 2010 (UTC) What is the ratio of Gravitons to photons when the electron changes orbits. is the Graviton is in opposition with photon if the electron emits photon when moving to lower energy orbit and the Graviton , or Graviton mathematical function, is in concordance with photon when the electron absorbs photon (or n multiple number of photons), does that move of electron includes the Lamb Shift in it's energy calculations. How is the mass of the electron is affected by it's motion among orbitals and within the orbitals? Does the Vacuum and it's vacuum energy, exhibit "friction" energy against the electron motion? could that friction could be the origin for the Graviton and the Graviton mathematical function? E:Y,?:G (talk) 22:37, 2 September 2010 (UTC) How do the masses: elementary particles, plants, moons, suns, galaxies, and black holes, universe, and other masses emits and absorbs Gravitons. If light, and electromagnetic waves are Only emitted from matter does that means that this electromagnetic waves and thus the electromagnetic spectrum must fall under gravity restriction. Meaning it can not travel outside a gravitational filed for example the Universe. Since, from Newton's first Law F1 = F2 = G (m1 x m2)/ r^2 and E = M C^2 (energy is matter and matter is energy). E:Y,?:G (talk) 05:10, 3 September 2010 (UTC) From the above, the electromagnetic spectrum and everything of energy must fall within a gravity force field of matter.E:Y,?:G (talk) 05:16, 3 September 2010 (UTC) Does Gravity become an "equilibrium" force working both ways attracting matter to energy and energy to matter. There is a center of gravity common to energy and matter.--e:Y,?:G 06:25, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Newton's second law F = d/dt (mv) , F = m a, I = m Δv
in comparison E = m C^2
there are other particles other than the electron that emits absorbs photon spontaneous forming and reabsorbing of electron and positron pair in space
gravitational lensing by black holes and galaxies (body's with tremendous gravitational energy) light and is bended, path of light is altered. beyond the black hole event horizon light path is alter by gravitational forces: two significant physical reality where light and gravity interact. some claims light is not localized and does not have have field of gravity and therefore no interactions which is not true. the above examples of the gravitational lensing and beyond the black hole event horizon indicate that light and gravity do interact at least at the above instances. in the case of gravitational lensing (where light is bended) the interaction of light and gravity is mediated through the medium or the space that the light is traveling through. in the case of the black hole the light is not able to escape or reflect off the surface of the black hole because of the work of the gravity forces the mechanism is yet to be determined if it is due to an alteration to the light wave it self or due to the alteration made upon the medium that light in the black hole travel through. --e:Y,?:G 16:55, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
the brief forming of electron and positron spontaneously in the space does that gives the space a "momentarily" mass and momentarily gravity force that could interfere with electromagnetic wave travel through it, and this momentarily mass gives the space a momentarily gravity center--e:Y,?:G 17:59, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
most of our studies, information, and findings are from, based on electromagnetic based information. this can give a probable systematic error to our collective knowledge. this information obtained are highly dependent upon our vision and light perceptions by our optical system.--e:Y,?:G 18:06, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
In reference to Physics and mathematics (although math is a lot of work for me), I think, to put it in some prospective, if we to understand one fold of Physics we at least have to understand 1000 fold of mathematics.--e:Y,?:G 05:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
An interesting concept to develop would be the surface tension that a plane of vacuum would create. --e:Y,?:G 05:28, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:56, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Please do not use article talk pages, such as Talk:Gravitation, as a general forum for discussion of the topic. The talk pages are intended for discussions of improvements to the related article. If you have a question, Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science may be more useful. - 2/0 (cont.) 22:26, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Vandalism[edit]
|
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 05:15, 8 October 2010 (UTC) |
Ok, I did know that. I will stop. I thought I could say what I think. but I will stop. thank you. and could you be more specific please. the word you used is very powerful (vandalism). Wikipedia have provided me with very good information and I would not do it or to any thing an act such as (vandalism). simply I thought I could state what I think and if it is wrong it will be corrected by discussion, nothing else. that and I would like to add that Wikipedia has inspired me to pursue a degree in physics, mostly to Wikipedia style in explaining issues and related subjects, something I think all schools and educational institute should follow. I have just reached the conclusion that Wikipedia should be ranked highest web site on the internet for it's valuable resource and the way it represent material and discussions. thank you.--e:Y,?:G 19:36, 13 October 2010 (UTC)