User talk:Earthh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Earthh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Tehw1k1 (talk) 03:44, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Randall Jahnson[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Randall Jahnson, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.randalljahnson.com.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:22, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Sunset Strip (film)[edit]

Stop hand nuvola.svg Your addition to Sunset Strip (film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

September 2010[edit]

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sunset Strip (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ttonyb (talk) 14:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately a slight reformulation of the text is not enough to remove the copyright violation. ttonyb (talk) 14:44, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Earthh, you may be blocked from editing. ttonyb (talk) 14:45, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

That isn't a slight reformulation. Read it.--Earthh (talk) 14:46, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sunset Strip (film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ttonyb (talk) 14:50, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Hangon...are you saying you wrote this for Wikipedia or you are the original author for another publication? If you are saying you are the original author for the Wikipedia text, the problem is there are direct quotes from other sources, that somewhat negate you claim. If you are saying you are the original author in other publications, it is still a copyright violation. Can you please advise which is the case. There are some remedies if you are the original author. ttonyb (talk) 14:53, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
I wrote it, so stop delete it. Read it.--Earthh (talk) 14:55, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sunset Strip (film). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AussieLegend (talk) 15:47, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Sunset Strip[edit]

Hi. I've protected the Sunset Strip article so you guys stop edit warring on it. Please use the talk page there to discuss your edits. Thanks. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 15:50, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

I think it's the best way.--Earthh (talk) 15:54, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hollywood High (documentary)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Hollywood High (documentary) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talkcontribs) 03:17, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Chapter 27 screenshot.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chapter 27 screenshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 15:45, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

It isn't that important. I did notice that you personally prefer Chapter 27, so much so that you uploaded a photo from it. Hotcop2 (talk) 00:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Not really. I uploaded a photo to illustrate the weight gained by Leto for his role.--Earthh (talk) 00:09, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Films[edit]

Don't delete references.--andreasegde (talk) 18:48, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

As I explained in the edit summary, both films have had low budgets and received mixed to negative reviews from critics [1] [2]. And the source you are using for The Killing of John Lennon is from IMDb, which is not reliable.--Earthh (talk) 18:59, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Death of John Lennon (film)[edit]

As it is now, there are NO references in this section. If you do not put references in, the whole section will be deleted. Get to work.--andreasegde (talk) 23:20, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jared Leto. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nymf hideliho! 18:22, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Consider this another 3RR warning, as you are close to violating it again. I suggest you resolve it at the talk page before editing any further. Nymf hideliho! 16:34, 7 September 2011 (UTC)


Your GA nomination of Chapter 27[edit]

The article Chapter 27 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Chapter 27 for things which need to be addressed. GRAPPLE X 23:30, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry to say I had completely forgotten about this review. I've been unable to fix the plot summary, but having removed any unreliably-sourced information I still felt the article was good enough to pass. Sorry again about the delay. GRAPPLE X 00:08, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Starting blocks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Starting block (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Joseph Plateau Award[edit]

Thanks for this article; could you add an inline citation to the first para, please? :). Ironholds (talk) 03:40, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Done.--Earthh (talk) 12:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Brilliant! Thanks :). Ironholds (talk) 14:39, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anthony Marinelli[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Anthony Marinelli has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bihco (talk) 14:45, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anthony Marinelli[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Anthony Marinelli has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 17:00, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Saturn Award for Best Science Fiction Film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pitch Black (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:55, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Unspoken.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Unspoken.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Geoffrey Enthoven[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Geoffrey Enthoven has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. --IShadowed 00:00, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Incorrect referencing in Mr. Nobody article[edit]

Hi again Earthh. I couldn't help noticing your latest edit to Mr. Nobody. You cite as a reference for the (false!) statement: "Mr. Nobody received mostly favorable reviews from critics" the following article from a French newspaper: "«Mr. Nobody» bien incarné sous la patte de Van Dormael". 20 minutes. January 14, 2010. 

Do you realize what you linked to is just one favorable review? It does not constitute evidence that most reviews were favorable, so why would you use that as a reference? It's also odd that you chose a positive review in a French paper, since, as you surely know, French reviews were largely negative in the major newspapers (Le Figaro, Le Monde, Libération, Journal du Dimanche) and culture/cinema magazines (Télérama, Inrocks, Cahiers du Cinéma) "Critiques Presse pour le film Mr. Nobody - AlloCiné".

I really wonder why you engage in such misleading editing of a Wikipedia article. Please try to improve the article, otherwise we're going to have an argument (if I can be bothered to engage in such a tedious exercise). There's really an interesting story to be written about this movie. For example, unlike in France, reviews in Belgium were mostly positive, perhaps because it was a Belgian director and the movie world in Belgium is quite small "La création belge vue par les Belges". But it is a disservice to make the movie seem something that it isn't. Imagine that at some point in the future, the movie is recognized as a masterpiece, studied in schools, and so on. Wouldn't it be interesting to know that it was poorly received when it came out? Isn't it in everyone's interest to make every Wikipedia article as true as possible? --Kai Carver (talk) 01:34, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

I don't understand what's your big problem, man. In the article is already written that in France the film received mixed response from film critics and had a disappointing box office performance. I picked that source from the Italian article of Mr. Nobody. And now that I'm saying to you the same thing for the fourth time, if French critics were more critical this doesn't mean that the film's general reception was mixed. I added Rotten Tomatoes as a source for a general consensus. I hope that you will not claim that the website is fake, false, unreliable and so on..--Earthh (talk) 13:51, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
There was a problem with your reference, so thanks for trying to fix it (and you're welcome for me calling attention to your error). The problem remains, though: Rotten Tomatoes has a grand total of 5 reviews! That's too few reviews to justify saying the movie "received mostly favorable reviews". And out of those 5 reviews, only 2 are from "top critics", and both of those are negative. How does this justify "mostly favorable"?
As for the significance of French reviews, since France was pretty much the only major market where the film was fully released, it is significant that the reviews there were negative, so yes, it does mean the general critical reception was mixed. There are few reviews on Rotten Tomatoes because the movie did not have a major release in the US. You can't characterize the critical reaction in the US if the movie was hardly reviewed at all, or else you'd have to mention the fact that almost no one reviewed it, and that therefore critical reception in the US is not representative of the global critical reception of the movie.
My problem with this article is that it still has statements and general content that are misleading and poorly referenced, see above and my previous comments on the article talk page. "Critical response was generally strong"--what does that even mean? "Mr. Nobody has appeared on many critics top ten lists of 2010"--no it hasn't, where's the evidence for that? It's good that the poor reception in France is referenced, but it should be mentioned in the Critical Reception section, otherwise it is too easy to miss, and quite inconsistent. The Critical Reception section lists numerous quotes, all of them positive except for one, which is half positive. So again, my problem with this article is that it continues to fail to meet Wikipedia standards for accuracy and neutrality. I really don't care about this movie, but I do care that Wikipedia has poor-quality information, and would like that to be corrected, preferably by you, since you obviously care about this subject.--Kai Carver (talk) 08:25, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Critics in France were divided, this means that some were positive and others negative. But film critics of any other country gave the film a positive review. Since on the net there isn't a reliable source for a general consensus that fits to you, I added the positive critical reception that the film received upon its premiere at Venice. For more answers to your repeated questions, I suggest you to read the article talk page. Thanks.--Earthh (talk) 12:09, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I haven't really followed this since I made my last edits, but I see you've kept the quote from Le Nouvel Observateur, although I really liked the one from Cahiers du cinema. Still, now there is a direct quote of one negative review in the article, so I am satisfied and won't bother you anymore. Thank you for creating this article. – Herzen (talk) 06:31, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Jared Leto[edit]

I'm sorry if it wasn't you, but why have you made up all those award nominations for Jared Leto? You know very well they didn't happen and I don't see what's the point. You might as well have claimed he's been Oscar-nominated for every one of his films. I don't understand how this could go un-noticed. 86.61.101.127 (talk) 13:10, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Actually it wasn't me, those awards were taken from IMDb.. I have no time now but you can look for reliable sources.--Earthh (talk) 19:38, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
You were right, some awards were made up. I removed them and fixed the filmography. The current awards are sourced by a book, Jared Leto by Hilmar Bender. Thanks for your notice.--Earthh (talk) 19:45, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Magritte du Cinéma.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Magritte du Cinéma.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:21, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Thirty seconds to Mars[edit]

I posted regarding this move to the talk page seeking consensus, and today I noticed someone went ahead and moved it (which I was going to do today, actually, since no one objected), and you reverted the move. I'd like to understand your objections to moving the page. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:44, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

And looking at the history of that article I'm thinking maybe you consider a move to be vandalism. If you look at what I posted on the talk page you'll see that's not the case. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:27, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Paul Fedor (director)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Paul Fedor (director) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 21:08, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Fedor (director), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flyleaf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:26, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edge of the Earth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Edge of the Earth[edit]

Discogs is more attendible than Allmusic. The first report that exist a promotional disc that was sent in the US, while no informations exist about the digital release (iTunes, Amazon or 7digital didn't report "Edge of the Earth" as a download single). --SuperVirtual (talk) 16:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

With what sources Allmusic write that there is a digital copy? Discogs is very attendible because it reports all version of various release, with also catalogue number (excluded if these items are digital singles/albums only, or particular promotional recordings). And now, I can't edit the pages for edit warring. --SuperVirtual (talk) 19:50, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
P.S. Also User:RazorEyeEdits notice this, so I'm not the only. --SuperVirtual (talk) 19:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Earthh actually pointed out on my talk page that there is a listing of the single on digital download on Allmusic. It's not 100% reliable, but Allmusic generally doesn't lie or make mistakes about releases too often. Actually, to my knowledge, i've never seen Allmusic list a release of any kind under any name in error, so I trust this.
RazorEye ⡭ ₪ ·o' ⍦ ࿂ 20:17, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring[edit]

The next revert by either SuperVirtual or Earthh related to "Edge of the Earth" will result in an immediate block.—Kww(talk) 18:43, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, it was not my intention. I told him that there was the same doubt just a week ago with another user. Then we find a reliable source (Allmusic) and a consensus. I wrote on his talkpage, but he said that Allmusic is not a reliable source and that Discogs, a database edited by registered users, is a better source. He is ignoring what I write and I don't know what to do.--Earthh (talk) 19:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Generally trying to get a consensus among all interested editors is the best approach. If you can't get people talking about it after trying on the talk page, starting an RFC might be the way to go.—Kww(talk) 19:24, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
You probably want to look at this discussion as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_48#DiscogsKww(talk) 19:29, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

I've determined that SuperVirtual was an account being used abusively by User:ItHysteria. All of his edits are invalid by policy, and can be be freely undone by any editor, including you.—Kww(talk) 20:16, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

re: 30 Seconds to Mars (album)[edit]

I don't get what your on about, the source clearly states the album is those genres, and completely qualifies as an RS. I started a discussion about the source on the reliable sources noticeboard [3], which no one has bothered to respond to. A response there would be appreciated. I call the big one bitey (talk) 18:37, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Paramore Platinum in Ireland[edit]

Hi, I am just wondering why you keep changing 'Brand New Eyes' and 'Riot's platinum status in Ireland. IRMA does have down in 2009, that Brand New Eyes went gold, but according to the twitter account @ParamoreIreland , which is run by Paramore's irish record label, Warner Music Ireland, 'Brand New Eyes' had gone platinum in 2010 (one year later) and 'Riot' had earlier as well. Warner Music Ireland also uploaded a picture with the band holding up a plaque with both albums on it in platinum with the irish flag at the top right of the plaque, confirming they both went platinum. Here is the picture to prove it - http://www.flickr.com/photos/tonyburkejnr/4730056434/sizes/l/in/photostream/ . The o2 Arena, MCR and musicscene.ie have also confirmed that 'All We Know is Falling' has gone gold, and that 'Riot' and 'Brand New Eyes' have gone platinum in their articles, which can be found as sources on the paramore discography page. I would ask that you stop changing this information as Brand New Eyes is no longer gold in Ireland but platinum in ireland, and riot is also platinum. It has even been confirmed by the band's record label which would be very sure of this, and other websites. ♦BobbyRing96♦ (talk to me) 18:44, 8 July 2013 (GMT)

I don't see any source by the record label. IRMA has yearly archived certifications since 2005. The only album listed is Brand New Eyes, certified gold in 2009. You said that it had gone platinum in 2010 but here it is not listed. Same thing for Riot. That plaque could mean a lot of things, maybe that the two albums combined reached a certification, but I don't see any platinum or gold there. The o2 Arena, MCR and musicscene.ie do not specify where the album was certified (it could be the Australian or British certification).--Earthh (talk) 10:03, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I have found a source on Warner Music Ireland's website. http://www.warnermusic.ie/index.php/component/content/article/34-artist-page/138-paramore.html#TB_inline?height=500&width=600&inlineId=bio_item In the bio they mention that 'All We Know Is Falling' has gone gold, and that 'Riot!' and 'Brand New Eyes' have gone platinum, because it is the irish record label, it would make perfect sense for them to be talking about the certifications of their own country, or at least they would specify if they were not, but the certifications they have given the Paramore Albums links up to many of the sources that can be found on the internet about their cert.'s in Ireland. And the photo with Paramore with their irish plaque would have to mean they are both platinum, because record labels don't give out plaques for two albums to accumulate together to make up a certification. One album only. Hope this clears everything up. ♦BobbyRing96♦ (talk to me) 14:34, 10 July 2013 (GMT)

We should not interpret the sources, they should be clear and specific. I removed your (bogus) sources, use the talk page and discuss with other editors. If these certifications really exist, they should be listed in the official IRMA archive.--Earthh (talk) 18:43, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Oh my god, why would you delete them? >.< It is extremely obvious, that these sources are legitimate. The IRMA archive is hardly ever updated and there are so many sources to back up my claims, including one with a plaque and the band and their very own record label >:( What is not specific enough about a picture, with the irish crest in the corner, the two albums on the plaque, the irish flag in the corner and the caption "Brand New Eyes" and "Riot!" go platinum in Ireland!? Plus, the record label have stated that that the albums have gone number one in Ireland on their paramore twitter support page. @ParamoreIreland is run by WarnerMusicIreland

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mr. Nobody (film poster).jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Mr. Nobody (film poster).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 03:28, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Revived interest in the film Infernal Affairs[edit]

Invitation to participate in the poll for Infernal Affairs.

From your edits for the film Infernal Affairs there is presently a poll taking place on The Departed film Talk page regarding whether you believe a separate subsection should be included for (a) Infernal Affairs as a source for the plot of The Departed film, and/or (b) a second subsection for the recently captured crime figure Whitey Bulger as the source for the character played by Jack Nicholson in the film.

The recent capture of Bulger has revived the question from two years ago of Infernal Affairs from when it did have a separate subsection on The Departed film page which was deleted by User:RepublicanJ, now known as User:OldJ. Invite to visit The Departed Talk page, to the Bulger section at the end of the Page, to participate in the Poll currently taking place. 208.120.96.227 (talk) 11:14, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

30 Seconds to Mars[edit]

Just dropping a line to say good work on the improvements on the article. It's been needing a re-write for a long time. Regards. HrZ (talk) 15:39, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

I've nominated it for the Good Article status. If you want to review it, no one has reviewed it yet.--Earthh (talk) 11:48, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Re:Music samples[edit]

The 64kbps figure is taken from here, a guideline page which ties in to the MOS and the NFC guidelines. J Milburn (talk) 18:53, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Yes; that will be usually sufficient, and the NFCC mandate that "An entire work is not used if a portion will suffice. Low- rather than high-resolution/fidelity/bit rate is used". If 64kbps will be sufficient, we use 64kbps. If it won't, then it's up to you to justify that. J Milburn (talk) 21:48, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Welcome to the Universe Tour.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Welcome to the Universe Tour.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Brand New Eyes... Part Two[edit]

Hi, could you undo the edit you did because I finally found a suitable reference, in which Hayley Williams actually states that both albums went platinum in Ireland. Impossible to deny that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbyring96 (talkcontribs) 00:37, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, but I will not undo the edit. The IRMA archive states that Brand New Eyes is gold. If the album has gone platinum, IRMA will report that. YouTube is everything except a reliable source. Try to discuss about it on the talk page to seek a consensus.--Earthh (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
I did post it on the talk page two weeks ago, no response. IRMA is not extremely reliable. While going on the website, I can find many albums which have gone platinum which aren't even mentioned. Adele's '21' is an example. It's not even mentioned on the IRMA website but it's gone 18 times platinum, as reported by RTE. A youtube video it may be, members of the band stated in a video that it did go platinum, and as the old source that was already up on wikipedia showed Paramore holding the plaque with Tony Burke from Warner Music Ireland, showing them holding a platinum certified plaque. That seems more reliable than a site that is not regularly updated. Plus, it does state on the IRMA websites that 'there are mistakes in the data'.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbyring96 (talkcontribs) 22:45, 23 November 2013 (UTC)


Hi, just to say, I found another source from the book 'Writing the Future' written by Paramore, which is available in eBook form on iTunes. It says in it that they're both platinum — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbyring96 (talkcontribs) 00:18, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

This could be a good source. I have that book, can you tell me in which page they explain that the band received these certifications?--Earthh (talk) 08:33, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, only seeing this now. Yep, on mine, it's pages 15,17 and 18. It shows all the countries they were certified in and what status. ((User:Bobbyring96|Bobby]] (talk) 21:42, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
I did not find it so reliable. It says that All We Know Is Falling is gold in the US, but of course it is not (check the RIAA archive). There are also other uncertain certifications such as a platinum for Riot in New Zealand. When you check the official archives, it seems that these certifications are made up.--Earthh (talk) 13:51, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Music samples[edit]

You appear to be confused. Whether or not there are editors who don't like our guideline/policy on the subject, the NFCC require that "An entire work is not used if a portion will suffice. Low- rather than high-resolution/fidelity/bit rate is used (especially where the original could be used for deliberate copyright infringement)." The guideline on sample usage helps us with what this means in practice, where it explains that "A Vorbis quality setting of 0 (roughly 64kbit/s) is usually sufficient." If you believe that this is not true in this case, it's up to you to explain why. If you believe that the policy should be changed, it's up to you to challenge it. Edit warring and brazenly choosing to ignore policy is not going to get you anywhere. J Milburn (talk) 14:40, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Those samples are already of reduced quality from the original. Do you think that the original work has a bit rate of 148 kbps? Of course not, it has a much higher bit rate. The guideline explains that "samples must be of reduced quality from the original", not that they must be of 64kbit/s (it just says that "A Vorbis quality setting of 0 (roughly 64kbit/s) is usually sufficient).--Earthh (talk) 08:29, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Yes- it's usually sufficient. It follows that the burden of proof is on those who believe it insufficient in a given case to explain why. J Milburn (talk) 17:50, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Jared Leto[edit]

That source is neither fake nor unreliable. It's an interview with Jared and Shannon Leto (in Polish). You can translate it into English at Google Translate, and foreign-language sources are allowed as references. The Letos discuss their childhood at length in the interview. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 03:03, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Actually that is the only source that deals with the Bryant surname. There are multiple biographies and more reliable sources (such as NY Times) that do not support your content. Try to find other sources; if that source says the truth, it will be easy to find other sources (biographies, interviews) that support your content.--Earthh (talk) 12:45, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Leto stated this himself in an interview, which makes it a reliable source. The NY Times never contradicted it, nor did any other source. There is no requirement that more than one reliable source be produced for something, especially if the subject of the article themselves states it in an interview, and it isn't contradicted by anything else. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 13:39, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Almost every source states that Leto is the surname of Jared's mother, Costance. I think we need more evidence for the Bryant surname and as I said before, if that source says the truth, it will be easy to find other sources that support this.--Earthh (talk) 13:45, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
What sources state that "Leto" is the surname of Constance? You mean the maiden name? Her maiden name is Metrejon. The Letos talk about their maternal grandfather, Willie Metrejon, in that article. Fan pages and the like have known about this for a long time (see this for example). I just couldn't find a source where Leto talked about it himself, until now. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 13:51, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Have you not found any other source? I've just restored your edits, though I would cite other sources.--Earthh (talk) 11:18, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
The quoted Polish source does not say that Leto was born Bryant, but rather that his mother was married to someone named Tony Bryant at that time. We need better sourcing than that (i.e. dealing with his birth name rather than who his mother was married to). Nymf (talk) 11:37, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
There isn't really a rule that there needs to be a second source, especially if the Letos themselves said it in an interview. BTW, the article doesn't just say that Tony Bryant was a man Leto's mother was married to; it says that Tony and Constance separated shortly after the birth of their second child/Jared. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 12:20, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
There is also this for a primary source. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 13:01, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Actually, the Interia.pl source states that it is an excerpt from a 30STM biography by Adam Kisch, not an interview. But the source looks reliable to me (I'm Polish). Mayast (talk) 13:10, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Well, either way, the article uses direct quotes from the Letos about their parents and their childhood (so it is something they were involved in, rather than an unauthorized piece of writing). All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 13:15, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Another source stating his father's name is his IMDb bio [written by some guy named Bob Stage]. Mayast (talk) 13:23, 15 December 2013 (UTC)


Could you please note that there is a message on the Talk page for Jared Leto from somone claiming to be his legal representative asking for references to Tony Bryant as Jared Leto's natural father to be deleted as they are incorrect. Jarrit29 (talk) 21:27, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Jarrit29

Disambiguation link notification for December 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Beautiful Lie Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ambassador Theatre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of songs recorded by Thirty Seconds to Mars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Message in a Bottle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kings and Queens (Thirty Seconds to Mars song)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kings and Queens (Thirty Seconds to Mars song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Prism -- Prism (talk) 17:21, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kings and Queens (Thirty Seconds to Mars song)[edit]

The article Kings and Queens (Thirty Seconds to Mars song) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Kings and Queens (Thirty Seconds to Mars song) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Prism -- Prism (talk) 18:52, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Boat Race (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sergi López (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Featured list comments[edit]

Hi,

I made one suggestion for your list, but overall I do support it for featured status. Would you like to give me feedback on 66th Academy Awards?

--Birdienest81 (talk) 21:06, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

71st Oscars[edit]

Hello Earthh,

Would you please, if you have time, to proofread the 71st Academy Awards regarding Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/71st Academy Awards/archive1,? Your help would be very much appreciated.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 23:53, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thirty Seconds to Mars[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thirty Seconds to Mars you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Вик Ретлхед -- Вик Ретлхед (talk) 20:11, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

4th Magritte Awards[edit]

Nice work on this article. For info, I've started articles on the top two nominated films, Tango libre and In the Name of the Son. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

I noticed that, thanks for your contributions :) I've also nominated 1st Magritte Awards to the featured list status, you can express your opinion if you want :) Earthh (talk) 14:23, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

GAN[edit]

Can you remove your comments at "Unresolved issues"? I listed them so the second reviewer (I already asked for another opinion) doesn't have to go through the entire review. If he says the article would be better without them, I'll list it as GA right away.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 17:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I thought they were addressed to me. However, I've removed my comments.--Earthh (talk) 20:24, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
No problem, good work so far.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 20:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thirty Seconds to Mars[edit]

The article Thirty Seconds to Mars you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Thirty Seconds to Mars for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Вик Ретлхед -- Вик Ретлхед (talk) 09:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

74th Oscars[edit]

Hello Earthh,

Would you please, if you have time, to proofread the 74th Academy Awards regarding Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/74th Academy Awards/archive1? Your help would be very much appreciated.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 06:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Sorry Birdienest81, I completely forgot this :( Humblest apologies.--Earthh (talk) 14:54, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thirty Seconds to Mars[edit]

The article Thirty Seconds to Mars you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Thirty Seconds to Mars for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Вик Ретлхед -- Вик Ретлхед (talk) 19:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Million Award![edit]

Million award logo.svg The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Thirty Seconds to Mars (estimated annual readership: 1,083,756) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! -- Bobnorwal (talk) 15:51, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Good work on this high-traffic article! Can't say I've ever listened to them, though I'm an old fart at heart, and I'll take my Nat King Cole over you kids' modern noise any day. Still, great job! :)Bobnorwal (talk) 15:51, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I appreciate it! You should try to listen them, they're amazing :) --Earthh (talk) 16:09, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Well done for getting the Million Award, it shows you're in tune with what our readers want. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you :) --Earthh (talk) 11:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Artifact (film)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Artifact (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shoebox2 -- Shoebox2 (talk) 22:51, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nom for Artifact -- update please?[edit]

Hi, just checking in as it's been a week since my initial review. I know you've made a start on revising the article in that time, and it's a good one -- I really like what you've done with the Reception section especially. Thing is, I'm getting the impression that you're not totally able to commit to the article right now, which becomes a problem since, as you know, I can't keep the nom open indefinitely. And as it stands right now, there are still some fairly major problems (notably completeness of the plot summary and production sections) that need to be addressed before I can pass it.

Can you give me an idea of where you're at? I've got no problem giving you another week or so as long as I can see the work being done; on the other hand, as I've said, I also have no problem closing the nom now and letting you work at your own pace, then re-nomming when you feel you're ready. Totally up to you, I just need to know where I stand. Many thanks, Shoebox2 talk 23:51, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

I've been very busy this week. I'm still working on the article, I hope to finish revising it during this week. Thank you for your patience, Shoebox2.--Earthh (talk) 14:44, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Welcome to the Universe Tour[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Welcome to the Universe Tour you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:41, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Welcome to the Universe Tour[edit]

The article Welcome to the Universe Tour you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Welcome to the Universe Tour for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:41, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Welcome to the Universe Tour[edit]

The article Welcome to the Universe Tour you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Welcome to the Universe Tour for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 07:21, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Artifact (film)[edit]

The article Artifact (film) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Artifact (film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shoebox2 -- Shoebox2 (talk) 20:11, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Welcome to the Universe Tour[edit]

Allen3 talk 18:23, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Artifact (film)[edit]

Thanks for the help Victuallers (talk) 00:37, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

2013 Oscars[edit]

Hello Earthh,

Would you please, if you have time, to proofread the 85th Academy Awards regarding Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/85th Academy Awards/archive1? Your help would be very much appreciated.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 06:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

1st Magritte Awards[edit]

Could I advise that you remove the File:Joff cannes.jpg image from the 1st Magritte Awards page? It is a questionable image and it is the only thing stopping the article from reaching FL status. If you remove the image—as per Crisco's advice—then I can promote the article. Thanks - SchroCat (talk) 12:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

I've removed it, thanks.--Earthh (talk) 12:27, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

79th Oscars (2007)[edit]

Hello Earthh,

Would you please, if you have time, to proofread the 79th Academy Awards regarding Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/79th Academy Awards/archive1? Your help would be very much appreciated.

Jared Leto nom[edit]

Hey, just a heads up because I saw you nominated Jared Leto for good article nomination. It is a good article, however there are quite a few unreliable sources (DailyMail, Huffington Post, etc.) that need to be replaced or the information removed, and if you want to get on that before the review process starts it'd probably be easier for the reviewer and you in the end. Just saying. Good luck with the article though :) LADY LOTUSTALK 15:40, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice, Lady Lotus, I'm working on the article.--Earthh (talk) 14:58, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

75th Oscars (2003)[edit]

Hello Earthh,

Would you please, if you have time, to proofread the 75th Academy Awards regarding featured list status? Your help would be very much appreciated.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 03:29, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

A-class Rock Music reviews[edit]

Hi. I'm seeing if there's an interest in doing A-class reviews for rock related articles to help bridge the gap between Good and Featured status. The discussion is at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rock music#A class reviews and I'd be grateful if you had any comments. Thankyou. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:30, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

I honestly know nothing about this, I will read something :) --Earthh (talk) 21:38, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of MTV Unplugged (Thirty Seconds to Mars EP)[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of MTV Unplugged (Thirty Seconds to Mars EP) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 97198 (talk) 11:04, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Thirty Seconds to Mars - 30 Seconds to Mars.jpeg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thirty Seconds to Mars - 30 Seconds to Mars.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for MTV Unplugged (Thirty Seconds to Mars EP)[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

MTV Unplugged (Thirty Seconds to Mars EP)[edit]

Hi Storye book! I saw that you recently reviewed the article MTV Unplugged (Thirty Seconds to Mars EP) for the DYK nomination. I was wondering if you would review it for the good article status. Thanks, --Earthh (talk) 21:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for asking me - much appreciated. However I only have one Good Article achievement myself, and I don't suppose that qualifies me as a GA reviewer. So I have simply done a copyedit on the article - it was basically fine except for one or two items (see my edit summary). It's unfortunate that the article involves a TV show and an EP with the same name, and both have to be in italics. That means I had to make the difference clear. Yes of course it's easy to work out which is which if you read it carefully, but at first glance it can be confusing. I hope that's OK. --Storye book (talk) 11:27, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
I've just made some minor edits. Thank you for your contributions :) --Earthh (talk) 18:58, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

75th Academy Awards[edit]

I have made a review at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Jared Leto filmography/archive2, which you have nominated. May I ask you to do a review of Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/75th Academy Awards/archive1 in return?

--Birdienest81 (talk) 20:39, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of MTV Unplugged (Thirty Seconds to Mars EP)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article MTV Unplugged (Thirty Seconds to Mars EP) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Prism -- Prism (talk) 11:21, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of MTV Unplugged (Thirty Seconds to Mars EP)[edit]

The article MTV Unplugged (Thirty Seconds to Mars EP) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:MTV Unplugged (Thirty Seconds to Mars EP) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Prism -- Prism (talk) 11:01, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited City of Angels (Thirty Seconds to Mars song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

86th Oscars[edit]

Hello there,

would you kindly proofread 86th Academy Awards for featured list status? I would appreciate the help very much.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 02:25, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Input at FAC[edit]

Hello Earthh. Are you currently able to do a review on Thirteen, an FA candidate of a friend of mine? You can leave comments at the review page. Appreciate your time.--Retrohead (talk) 10:36, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for asking me, Retrohead, much appreciated. However I only have some Good Article achievement myself, and I don't suppose that qualifies me as a reviewer.--Earthh (talk) 11:48, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/City of Angels (Thirty Seconds to Mars song)[edit]

Earthh, your DYK nomination has a major issue: 5x expansions are supposed to be "new": that is, like newly created articles, they must have reached the required size within seven days. This one took twenty-seven days from the July 18 expansion start to the nomination on August 14, the point at which it achieved a 5x expansion. Your best bet for this to qualify would be to take the GA route: as long as it's nominated within seven days of being approved ("listed") as a GA, it will qualify. Good Articles qualify; featured articles do not, so the current FAC, if successful, will preclude a main page appearance as a DYK, even while it makes possible a future appearance there as "today's featured article".

Sorry for the bad news. One of the reasons that new GAs were allowed at DYK was for those articles where expansion took a long time to qualify by passing at GAN. Please let me know if you have any questions. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:29, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your attention to the issue, BlueMoonset, you've been very clear. If the FAC fails, I will try it with a GAN.--Earthh (talk) 11:21, 17 August 2014 (UTC)