|“||Well that's my opinion, but I could be wrong.||”|
- 1 Help test new SuggestBot design
- 2 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 3 Thanks
- 4 Hello
- 5 Judeo-Christian topics
- 6 Angel Moroni
- 7 Epic of Gilgamesh
- 8 Era nomenclature
- 9 greetings
- 10 revert on Muslim
- 11 A kitten for you!
- 12 Astrology and classical element categories
- 13 Ganesha
- 14 Postmodern religion
- 15 Monogenēs
- 16 CfD concerning WP:PERFCAT (or not?)
- 17 Biblical Manuscript
- 18 Holy Comforter
- 19 The Mote and the Beam
- 20 Lamassu
- 21 Book of Isaiah era-style
- 22 Ancient Roman religion
- 23 Sacred Article
- 24 Category:Antisemitism
- 25 Signature
- 26 Science section
- 27 Removal of Category:Sexism from Transphobia
- 28 A barnstar for you!
- 29 Category:Theology
- 30 as one of the more interested editors of Abrahamic religions article in the past ...
- 31 Creation Science
- 32 Book of Elchasai
- 33 2nd law of thermodynamics.
- 34 Good article rating
- 35 Nominated article: Book of Daniel
- 36 Last Judgment - Gehenna
- 37 Halloween cheer!
- 38 Toolbox Add?
- 39 Pinging
- 40 Smallcat CfD discussion
- 41 edits........and mods
- 42 Straw Poll
- 43 Samaritan Pentateuch
- 44 Abraham (Diff)
- 45 sources
- 46 Seasonal Greets!
Help test new SuggestBot design
We have developed an exciting new version of SuggestBot’s interface with some cool features! Volunteer to be one of the first users to try it and help us make it better by answering a short survey! If you’re interested in participating, leave us a message on SuggestBot’s user talk page. Regards from Nettrom, SuggestBot’s caretaker. 18:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
|1,013||3.0||Baptism (talk)||2.0||2.0||2.0||2.0||2.0||Add sources|
|17||1.0||Sodhi (talk)||0.0||0.0||0.0||0.0||0.0||Add sources|
|137||3.0||Milk and meat in Jewish law (talk)||2.0||2.0||2.0||2.0||2.0||Add sources|
|5,597||3.0||Buddhism (talk)||2.0||2.0||2.0||2.0||2.0||Add sources|
|354||2.0||John Harvey Kellogg (talk)||2.0||2.0||2.0||2.0||0.0||Add sources|
|114||1.0||Bible translations into English (talk)||0.0||2.0||2.0||2.0||0.0||Add sources|
|157||2.0||Catholic Church and Nazi Germany (talk)||2.0||2.0||2.0||2.0||2.0||Cleanup|
|127||3.0||The Bible and violence (talk)||2.0||2.0||0.0||0.0||0.0||Cleanup|
|95||2.0||Development of the Old Testament canon (talk)||2.0||2.0||2.0||2.0||0.0||Expand|
|419||2.0||Judaism's view of Jesus (talk)||2.0||2.0||0.0||2.0||2.0||Unencyclopaedic|
|443||2.0||Religious conversion (talk)||2.0||2.0||2.0||2.0||2.0||Unencyclopaedic|
|910||1.0||Hebrew Bible (talk)||0.0||2.0||2.0||2.0||0.0||Merge|
|84||1.0||Islamic view of the Christian Bible (talk)||0.0||2.0||0.0||2.0||0.0||Merge|
|492||3.0||Online chat (talk)||0.0||0.0||2.0||2.0||0.0||Merge|
|110||3.0||Thou shalt not steal (talk)||2.0||2.0||0.0||0.0||2.0||Wikify|
|31||1.0||Muwahhid Muslim (talk)||0.0||0.0||0.0||0.0||0.0||Wikify|
|132||2.0||Witches' Sabbath (talk)||0.0||2.0||0.0||2.0||0.0||Wikify|
|3||1.0||Mythological data of thirthankara (talk)||0.0||0.0||0.0||0.0||0.0||Orphan|
|15||2.0||History of Western civilization before AD 500 (talk)||2.0||2.0||2.0||2.0||0.0||Orphan|
|6||1.0||Leo Friedlander (talk)||0.0||0.0||0.0||0.0||0.0||Stub|
|1||1.0||Daral clan (talk)||0.0||0.0||0.0||0.0||0.0||Stub|
|8||1.0||Grundy Senior High School (talk)||0.0||0.0||0.0||0.0||0.0||Stub|
|13||1.0||New Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (talk)||0.0||0.0||0.0||0.0||0.0||Stub|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:34, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Dear Editor 2020, I am very happy for your edit in the WP page Marxism and religion. I wished to post a thank you note to you, but I could not understand how exactly I would do this. I humbly request you, maybe venturing beyond my authority, that you may please keep this page under watch. This page has been subject to vandalism before. And yes, thousands of students every year do visit this page on Marxism. Strangely though, after the fall of USSR Marxism is being taught with more critical attitude across almost all the universities in the world (especially in countries like UK, USA, India, Egypt, etc.). Please, if possible, make this page a place of secure edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arghyan Opinions (talk • contribs) 02:12, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi Editor2020, this is my new account. My old account was Jerm729, but I changed it because of too many issues with other users in discussions. The reason why I am telling you this because I believe your editing skills are always in a progressive state of...well...progression. Your edits in biblical articles I have never had an issue with, and I really appreciate your editing on biblical articles and Wikipedia in general. -- Cheers -- JudeccaXIII (talk) 04:48, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. Editor2020 17:15, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Dear Editor2020, the CfD about Judeo-Christian topics in which you participated has been closed with a decision to keep the category. Apart from that, what is your opinion about my statement in this discussion that the category has been polluted with many articles that do not seem to belong there? Very specifically, would you mind if I would try a cleanup - or do you just entirely disagree with this statement? Marcocapelle (talk) 21:15, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Please feel free to attempt a clean-up, paying attention to the actual meaning of Judeo-Christian, "a set of beliefs and ethics held in common by Judaism and Christianity". Editor2020 01:54, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- For now, I removed this category from 3 out of 4 child categories and removed the category from 4 out of 8 articles (this count excludes the lead article which I obviously left untouched). Personally I feel I've been very conservative. On the other hand, I'm curious if any reverts will happen. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:35, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Epic of Gilgamesh
My apologies for reverting your edits. The ip just before your edit was the one evading a block. Your edits got caught in an edit conflict as they weren't there on my edit screen. Sorry 'bout that, Vsmith (talk) 01:33, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- No problem. Editor2020 01:35, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Can be a bit tricky as WP:ERA isn't explicit about what it means by "established", but this one started as BCE and a few quick checks shows no changes, just the addition of a few BCs presumably as people edited without thinking about the whole article. So I've edited it so hopefully it is all now BCE and AD (not that we really need all those BCEs as usually it is pretty clear). Dougweller (talk) 16:43, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- I think that that is more appropriate for this article. thanks. Editor2020 02:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
hello. I do appreciate your hard work and edits and clean-ups and careful scrutiny of WP articles, especially Biblical and Religious and Philosophy type articles. Most of your edits and mods I agree with, and I consider very good, or I am ok with, as you notice. Not all obviously, but most. But I was a bit curious about something. I was wondering if you sometimes might be following me around a little bit. Or if you have me on your "watch list" or something. (I think I might have asked you this some time in the recent past.) The reason I ask is because I've noticed that you have edited articles RIGHT AFTER I have (or at least very soon after), even in articles where you have no real history prior, in editing. Like recently the "Hades" article, as one of a number of examples. If so, why? Just wondering. Let me know. Thanks. Gabby Merger (talk) 20:05, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- Nope, but evidently we have similar interests. I was editing long before you came along. Look at my contributions list and you'll see that I edit a lot of pages. I do tend to visit them when a change has been made, maybe that's it. Editor2020 02:41, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- ps. Just a quick check, but it looks I edited Hades as early as Feb 6, 2011. But let me know it you have figured out how to follow someone. Editor2020 02:48, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Dear user, I reverted this unsubstantiated edit [here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muslim&diff=610200554&oldid=605421981], which you have undone. The 10-20% figure is a general figure of Shias and 1% of Ahmadis, per source.--Peaceworld 19:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Thanks for the thank
Astrology and classical element categories
The classical elements are assigned to the signs of the Zodiac and are part of most astrology systems as a search of gbooks with the search term astrology earth fire air water quickly shows. SpinningSpark 05:49, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
I am readding the Budhhist deity cat as though primarily a Hindu deity, he is incorporated in Buddhist pantheons in Ladakh, Sikkim, Thailand, Nepal, Tibet etc, generally as a minor deity See Ganesha#Beyond_India_and_Hinduism. --Redtigerxyz Talk 05:54, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Dear Editor 2020, I agree that postmodern religion is not a faith, but I do think that postmodern religion is a movement so that it belongs in the faiths and movements category. How else would you characterize postmodern religion if not as a movement? Marcocapelle (talk) 07:13, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Why not just categorize as it Category:Postmodern religion, under Category:Postmodernism and Category:Religion, but I agree it's a close call and won't complain if you think you must add Category:Religious faiths, traditions, and movements. Editor2020 17:41, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
The Quran does indeed state about Jesus uniqueness and born of virgin etc.
O People of the Book! Commit no excesses in your religion: Nor say of Allah aught but the truth. Christ Jesus the son of Mary was (no more than) a messenger of Allah, and His Word, which He bestowed on Mary, and a spirit proceeding from Him: so believe in Allah and His messengers. Say not "Trinity" : desist: it will be better for you: for Allah is one Allah: Glory be to Him: (far exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belong all things in the heavens and on earth. And enough is Allah as a Disposer of affairs. (4:171, Yusif Ali)
He said: "Nay, I am only a messenger from thy Lord, (to announce) to thee the gift of a holy son. 20 She said: "How shall I have a son, seeing that no man has touched me, and I am not unchaste?" 21 He said: "So (it will be): Thy Lord saith, 'that is easy for Me: and (We wish) to appoint him as a Sign unto men and a Mercy from Us': It is a matter (so) decreed." (19:19-21, Yusif Ali)
And (remember) her who guarded her chastity: We breathed into her of Our spirit, and We made her and her son a sign for all peoples. (21:91, Yusif Ali
We gave Moses the Book and followed him up with a succession of messengers; We gave Jesus the son of Mary Clear (Signs) and strengthened him with the holy spirit. Is it that whenever there comes to you a messenger with what ye yourselves desire not, ye are puffed up with pride?- Some ye called impostors, and others ye slay! (2:87, Yusif Ali)
Behold! Allah said: "O Jesus! I will take thee and raise thee to Myself and clear thee (of the falsehoods) of those who blaspheme; I will make those who follow thee superior to those who reject faith, to the Day of Resurrection: Then shall ye all return unto me, and I will judge between you of the matters wherein ye dispute. (3:55, Yusif Ali)
Sura 4:171 -- O People of the Book! Commit no excesses in your religion: Nor say of Allah aught but the truth. Christ Jesus the son of Mary was (no more than) a messenger of Allah, and His Word, which He bestowed on Mary, and a spirit proceeding from Him: so believe in Allah and His messengers. Say not "Trinity": desist: it will be better for you: for Allah is one Allah: Glory be to Him: (far exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belong all things in the heavens and on earth. And enough is Allah as a Disposer of affairs.
As I tried to make clear. The Quran and New Testament are in agreement. Excepting when various use the word 'begotten'. The word begotten is from NOT from the Greek monogenes but from the Latin and worse Vulgate at that.
That is why the Quran reacts the only begotten. But still expresses Jesus uniqueness.
Sura 21:26 -- And they say: "(Allah) Most Gracious has begotten offspring." Glory to Him! they are (but) servants raised to honour.
Sura 23:91 -- No son did Allah beget, nor is there any god along with Him: (if there were many gods), behold, each god would have taken away what he had created, and some would have lorded it over others! Glory to Allah! (He is free) from the (sort of) things they attribute to Him!
Sura 112:3 -- He begetteth not, nor is He begotten;
It seems to me, that if you are interested in truth, then we should completely reject the later Latin corruptions which lead to the English only-begotten. And also cite supporting Quran scriptures of Jesus uniqueness and special position. PS: Sahih International translation is poor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 00:20, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think you understand the Wikipedia concepts of WP:Reliable sources and WP:Primary sources. Check those out. Editor2020 01:37, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
CfD concerning WP:PERFCAT (or not?)
Hey Editor2020, sports is not a subject I'm usually interested in but for this one I made an exception: Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_August_1#Category:2010_Tour_de_France_cyclists. It seems to me that it goes against WP:PERFCAT, what's your opinion? Marcocapelle (talk) 06:09, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Ditto on the not interested. I'll have to think about it. Editor2020 14:49, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
All the early manuscripts in the New Testament table are papyri, except 4. The 4 that are not papyri are unicials. Before there were more than 4 unicials in the table but they have been removed and replaced with papyri. Papyri are the earliest ms of the NT. Happy editing!
I was updating the Comforter (disambiguation) page as I was surprised not to see the term "Holy Comforter". I'm not sure how to handle this as Paraclete is also an entry, but it can have more meanings. Wikipedia doesn't make it absolutely clear what the "Holy Comforter" is, but I believe it is a reference to the Holy Spirit (Christianity).— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:57, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The Mote and the Beam
- As you wish. I won't change it. Editor2020 15:47, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello Editor2020! I have come across something puzzling, and I though perhaps you could help me sort it out. I just finished making a second set of copyedits to Cherub. I had made some copyedits about two weeks ago, and then listed some issues on my talk page at User talk:CorinneSD#Cherub, but got no help, so I went ahead and fixed things myself. I saw a nice photo at Persepolis#Gate of All Nations that I thought perhaps could be added to Cherub to illustrate "lamassu", but maybe the image that's already there is enough. But I am puzzled about something:
- In the first paragraph of Cherub#Origins it says a shedu is a human-headed winged bull and, later in that paragraph, that a lamassu is a human-headed winged lion.
- In the first paragraph of Persepolis#Gate of All Nations it says lamassus are bulls with the heads of bearded men.
- In the WP article Lamassu, it says "A lammasu is an Assyrian protective deity, often depicted with a bull or lions body, eagle's wings, and human's head".
- Sorry, I don't know the answer to your questions. Editor2020 21:07, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Book of Isaiah era-style
Hello, there is an issue in article: Book of Isaiah. The era-style is inconsistent. I changed some to BCE because I thought that was original consensus, but I'm not sure anymore. I viewed the article's history from the very beginning, and the first implement of era-style was BC/AD. Any suggestions on how to fix this? -- Cheers -- JudeccaXIII (talk) 22:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- I would say revert any recent changes. If the usage is inconsistent, I would open a discussion on the Talk page to get consensus for one usage. Editor2020 22:41, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Ancient Roman religion
Hey Editor2020, why removed Paganism, good question. Normally I do add a reason, don't know why I forgot this time. The reason is that classical religions are usually no longer included in Paganism. It is Ancient Roman religion and Ancient Greek religion in contrast to Germanic paganism and Slavic paganism. By the way, the main article Paganism is very ambiguous in defining paganism. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:24, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- So Greek and Roman religion are not classified as pagan, but Germanic and Slavic (and others) are? Humm...I'm not sure I can work out the logic behind that. Editor2020 18:31, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Hey, what's the best way for Wikipedia users to communicate? I was interested in discussing the article on Sacred. :)
- If it's about the article, I would suggest the article's Talk page, otherwise the person's Talk page. Editor2020 22:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello — I noticed that your edit of Category:Antisemitism removed the parent category Category:Orientalism, edit here, with the edit summary “??”. I believe that “Orientalism” was used in the sense of “eastern”, as in Near East or Middle East. For example, the Oriental Institute, Oxford includes a Department of Hebrew and Jewish Studies. Given that context, do you think the parent category was appropriate? 07:17, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think that the sense of "Eastern" would justify it and I don't think it's appropriate to the definition of Orientalism but if you feel strongly the other way please feel free to reverse it. Editor2020 17:44, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- No strong feelings about that, and I wouldn't have added that parent category originally; I was just trying to provide some background in response to the puzzled edit summary (“??”). 23:14, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- OK. Thanks! Editor2020 00:05, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- OK. Editor2020, Talk, 03:31, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
The science section on the afterlife should be sourced to reliable sources and represent the mainstream scientific consensus. Adding in fringe proponents or parapsychologists and other paranormal cranks is not science. It was also unsourced. And yes if you check the edit history of the article there was an IP address also removing this. This was not me but you can see why. I don't think it is accurate to put fringe views in the science section. If you want that material in the article perhaps put it in the parapsychology section. Goblin Face (talk) 06:53, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Removal of Category:Sexism from Transphobia
Please take the time to read or at least skim articles before removing categories. For example, the second paragraph which defines cissexism. A quick search of the article would have yielded multiple uses of the term 'sexism' defining its relationship with transphobia. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 14:52, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|The Tireless Contributor Barnstar|
|For copyediting, reverting vandalism and following NPOV policy on thousands of articles. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 15:58, 9 September 2014 (UTC)|
I notice you're doing some work with categories, and that you removed this one. It is a theological belief, so do you have a replacement for it? It's not Christian theology, but pantheistic. Daniel David Palmer actually considered making it a religion. See D.D. Palmer's Religion of Chiropractic (PDF download) from the official archives. He often refers to himself with royal third person terminology and also as "Old Dad". It's well worth the read, and a real eye-opener for most people. -- Brangifer (talk) 19:38, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- I think it is categorized OK now, but what would you like to add? Category:Paranormal? Editor2020, Talk 22:29, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
- Ah, I see you already added them. Editor2020, Talk 23:00, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
as one of the more interested editors of Abrahamic religions article in the past ...
Hi! Sorry, I got mistaken that "radioactive dating" was already linked at Creation science, even though it was "Geochronology#Radiometric dating" that was linked! :-) Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 18:11, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello Editor2020, I just created my first article ever on Wikipedia: Book of Elchasai, and I would like for you to expand this article as much as possible. I used this site as a reference: http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/elchasai.html, but within the site contains many references for sourcing by scholars and church fathers. Perhaps this may give you some interest as this article is around your editing field -- Thnx & Cheers -- JudeccaXIII (talk) 18:14, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
2nd law of thermodynamics.
Sorry about that deletion, for a moment I confused "closed" with "isolated" system. (Isolated system - Exchanges neither energy nor matter with its surroundings). Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 01:49, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Good article rating
Hello friend, I was examining the article: Book of Daniel earlier today, and I believe the article is almost ready for good rating. The only thing required is images with well description, and the Unity sect under section Composition will most likely cause some issues for the rating though. I'm not saying you should fix it but feel free to do so. I just want your opinion on the article as I believe it as well balanced per WP:RSUW in the Influence section when it comes to religious views. See the criteria for good article rating. --Cheers-- JudeccaXIII (talk) 00:59, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Nominated article: Book of Daniel
Hello, I nominated the article: Book of Daniel for good rating. I'm sending this message to you because you have recently contributed greatly or have done many contributions to the article to help improve it for nomination. You must read the instructions for the reviewing process. Some of the steps have already been taken to prepare the article for nomination so just wait patiently, and keep watch of the article's talk page. --Cheers-- JudeccaXIII (talk) 20:05, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Last Judgment - Gehenna
Hello Editor2020 Why did you make correction on my edit? I add link to Gehenna where is written hell (Luke 12:5) because that is what is written in original, so that people can see to what English translation is referring to. I am not wrong, here are links for Luke 12:5: Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gehenna#New_Testament Biblehub (parallel translations): http://biblehub.com/luke/12-5.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gsom7 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
I have a couple of interesting boxes that I've found, not sure if they can benefit you in your work, but I'd like to pass them along to you! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Twillisjr/sandbox (Under Sample 1 and Sample 2). Your toolbox is very neat, I like it! Have a Blessed Day! Twillisjr (talk) 09:32, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Editor2020. Apologies for bothering with technical issues: I edited the post at Talk:Santría - does it mean that if I edit a message that contains ping, the target editor gets pinged again initially and then again when I save the new edit? Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 19:55, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- I don't know.Editor2020, Talk 01:17, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Smallcat CfD discussion
Hey Editor2020, this is a discussion about some bishops categories with only one entry: Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_September_27#Category:Bishops_of_Alais.E2.80.8E.
NOW I understand....the word "eating" should not have been there. So all you had to do is instead of reverting, just correct the mistake... Esoglou and I did. Sorry about that. But a total revert was not necessary. Just rather correcting the grammatical or wording mistake. Regards. Gabby Merger (talk) 19:38, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
There is a straw poll that may interest you regarding the proper use of "Religion =" in infoboxes of atheists.
The straw poll is at Template talk:Infobox person#Straw poll.
This is POV The Samaritan Pentateuch, also known as the Samaritan Torah (Hebrew: תורה שומרונית torah shomroniyt), is the scripture used by the Samaritans. It comprises the first five books of the Hebrew Bible, written in the Samaritan alphabet, and constitutes their entire biblical canon. The SP does NOT comprise the first five books of anything except itself. The rewording is better and less POV. Theredheifer (talk) 21:22, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Ref this According to a view based on the biblical Book of Ezra (Ezra 4:11), the Samaritans are the people of Samaria (the Northern Kingdom) who parted ways with the people of Judah (the Judahites) in the Persian period. The RS, Tov uses the word Samaria. We go with what the RS says, not your Original Research. At least provide a justification, rather than just edit warring. Theredheifer (talk) 21:26, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- You keep repeating the same phrases, but without explaining them. You keep using the term RS, but have provided no wp:Reliable Source in your edits, what is your Reliable Source? Please include it in the article. Editor2020, Talk 21:33, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- No. Editor2020, Talk 04:56, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
|Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015 !!!|
Hello Editor2020, May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2015.
- Right back at ya! Editor2020, Talk 21:30, 19 December 2014 (UTC)