User talk:Eduen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Template:Hippies[edit]

Looks good, and I think I know exactly what color scheme you were trying to go for, but it doesn't quite come out on my end. The Barnes & Noble book store near me has a book in the graphic design section that contains the exact color codes for several "hippie" color schemes, and if you like, I can access them and try to add them to the template. What do you think? Viriditas (talk) 01:13, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

I'll try and get a hold of it tomorrow if I have the time. They have at least three different types. Viriditas (talk) 01:21, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello and welcome. I noticed a few edits on hippie. You can use your Sandbox for test edits before editing other articles. Thanks and have fun. Law shoot! 01:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Eduen. You have new messages at Viriditas's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Good show old sport[edit]

I saw what you're doing over at individualist anarchism You are the thing that we have needed for years and years and years. You might be interested in helping out finishing egoist anarchism, as it's been stagnating for months. Have you signed up to the anarchist task force yet? Zazaban (talk) 07:24, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

The main issue is sources, there is a lot needed, and some of the stuff that's there may be biased, as most of it comes from a single guy. Also, there should be (a lot) more about communist egoism. Zazaban (talk) 07:45, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Okay, thank you. Do you mind coming in and helping me incorporate it? I'm not really that great at large projects myself. Zazaban (talk) 08:02, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
I agree. I have always felt that our coverage of individualist anarchism is crap. Basically, it is about market anarchism with some vague references to there also being other stuff. Let's say we work together with both articles? Zazaban (talk) 08:11, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
I also notice we both share an interest in the hippies. Nice. Zazaban (talk) 08:13, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
You have a lot of very good ideas. You're welcome to add some of that to the article if you want. Zazaban (talk) 20:16, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

I agree with Zazaban. I enjoy what you have done with the individualist anarchism page as well. Thank you for your time. Libertad450 (talk) 22:57, 31 May 2009 (UTC)Libertad450

User:Zazaban/Egoist anarchism[edit]

I really like what you have to offer, and I think you should incorporate some of the stuff into this article proposal. You seem very interested in the subject, and I think your contributions would be invaluable. Zazaban (talk) 22:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Userboxes/Music[edit]

I have removed the two user boxes that you posted to this page. The boxes themselves are fine, no problem there, but the way you posted them broke the page's template. The reason is that you posted the actual wiki-mark-up code onto the page, rather than posting it on a user page and then transcluding it to the page above, as all the other boxes have done on that page. Please do create your own usser page with that mark-up and then put in the transclusion templates on the page again. You can retieve your coding from the page history. If this is unclear or confusing, drop me a note and I can explain in more detail, or help you do it! - Ahunt (talk) 11:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Individualist anarchism[edit]

I don't have any more along those lines, but I agree totally. You should post that on the talk page. Zazaban (talk) 02:08, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Post left anarchy and post anarchism[edit]

Hey, do you agree that they should be in the article? Zazaban (talk) 18:02, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Do you mind re-adding it? I would, but I need other people's direct support. Zazaban (talk) 23:59, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
And by the way, could you give me the link to where it says that post-left is individualist? That would be a great help. Zazaban (talk) 18:53, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
As well as something for post-anarchism being individualist. Things are getting really nit-picky and hair-splitty, so we may need a few. Zazaban (talk) 19:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Most anarcho-capitalists have absolutely nothing to do with the republican party. And please, stop accusing people of neoliberalism. It would probably be a much smoother affair if you stopped with the personal attacks and tirades. Zazaban (talk) 23:50, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

I think you may approve of my latest edits to the page. Zazaban (talk) 00:10, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
True, but it just inflames the discussion and makes it harder to get things done. Also, neoliberalism evolved after anarcho-capitalism, so even if they are similar, they are not the same thing. Zazaban (talk) 00:21, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

You haven't done anything for a few days, are you okay? Zazaban (talk) 16:59, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Good work with the latest edits- And we're not being reverted. What should we do next? Can you find a source for post-anarchism being individualist? I found one for Post-left anarchy, but I couldn't find one for post-anarchism. I didn't have time to look very hard though. Zazaban (talk) 18:28, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Dispute resolution.[edit]

I suggest it's time to bring this to there. Nilho is the only person that is so aggressively opposed to any changes, and I looked over User_talk:Nihilo_01#Deletions_of_categories_in_the_Inclusive_Democracy_entry, and found out he's done this before. I suggest you post this at WP:Dispute resolution. Zazaban (talk) 20:42, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

User:Zazaban/Individualist anarchism[edit]

I've created User:Zazaban/Individualist anarchism for us, so that we can work on the article without getting reverted before we're finished. Then we can propose a final draft once everything is completed. Zazaban (talk) 02:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

This is mainly for you to edit, by the way- I don't really have enough time on my hands to work on whole sections like you do- the speed you work at is incredible- I'll probably just add a few sentences. Zazaban (talk) 03:25, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Button sig.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 12:40, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anarchist naturism[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Anarchist naturism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ridernyc (talk) 07:45, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Anarchist naturism[edit]

Articles for deletion nomination of Anarchist naturism[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated Anarchist naturism, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anarchist naturism. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Vision Thing -- 19:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Egoist anarchism[edit]

Hi, I don't know if you're still here, but I thought that you might be interested in the new article Egoist anarchism. It seems like your thing, and there's a lot of room for expansion. Zazaban (talk) 20:26, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Welcome back[edit]

Looking forward to working with you again :D! Zazaban (talk) 16:58, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

By the way, my articles Egoist anarchism and Contemporary anarchism have been finished since you were gone, and I'm also working on User:Zazaban/Anarchism and Chaos as well. Thought you might want to check them out. I thought Novatore might fit somewhere in Egoist, but I'm not sure. Zazaban (talk) 01:54, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Lev Chernyi[edit]

I'm working on Lev Chernyi, and since you're much more well versed in this kind of thing than I am, you might be able to help. Zazaban (talk) 03:45, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Further expansion of Individualist anarchism.[edit]

I'd say there's still plenty of room for expansion. Any ideas? Suppose you could try to creative the anarchist naturalism article again as well? Zazaban (talk) 07:51, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Edit summary[edit]

Information.svg Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. When you blank out a large section without a reason, I am inclined to revert your edits. You may, of course, undo my edit but filling in an edit summary will help the project. Thanks A8UDI 12:24, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Eduen. You have new messages at A8UDI's talk page.
Message added 23:46, 2 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A8UDI 23:46, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Anarchism and Friedrich Nietzsche[edit]

This is a great idea for an article and a good start, well done!  Skomorokh, barbarian  11:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Anarchism and Friedrich Nietzsche[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated Anarchism and Friedrich Nietzsche, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anarchism and Friedrich Nietzsche. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Soxwon (talk) 20:46, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Anarchism and Friedrich Nietzsche[edit]

Socratic Barnstar.png The Socratic Barnstar
For an excellent job creating and expanding Anarchism and Friedrich Nietzsche. ThemFromSpace 21:06, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
I read through your article and found it extremely well-written and informative. Good work! ThemFromSpace 21:06, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Article you may be interested in[edit]

Sex-positive_movement#History. Started a history section, but it's very rickety right now. Zazaban (talk) 20:06, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Anarchism and Friedrich Nietzsche[edit]

Had already got to it. I don't think there was ever much chance of it being deleted anyway. Zazaban (talk) 20:15, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Anarcho-naturism[edit]

I would think it would be a good time to try creating that article again. I believe there is fair precedent now. Zazaban (talk) 20:33, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Anarchy[edit]

Hey, I just wanted to explain, I didn't want you to think that I was for totally reverting your edits. From what it looked like I agree with a lot of them. However, could we take it a little slower? I think that others would like a little more input into such sweeping changes. Soxwon (talk) 20:46, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

I ask[edit]

When you will learn... --Nihilo 01 (talk) 04:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Anarchism[edit]

Stop edit warring. There is no consensus for your proposed changes. It has been discussed and reverted enough times for you to get the point by this time. Please cease in this disruptive behavior. - 4twenty42o (talk) 22:31, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

The fact that your ideas have been rejected mean that you need to reach a consensus to make these changes. The lack of a consensus is not a freedom to edit war and push your own opinion. I am asking you to either discuss it or drop it. Please stop making such radical changes that change the over all tone of the article. There is a huge difference between being bold and edit warring. When you first introduced your material that was being bold. Being stubborn and refusing to accept that a majority of the editors to the article disagree are two totally different things. At this point it is disruptive and you have been asked to stop. - 4twenty42o (talk) 04:30, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
User:Nihilo 01, User:Knight of BAAWA and myself have asked you to stop making changes without a consensus. That means that we disagree for one reason or another. In my case I disagree because you are pushing changes without consensus, after several users have asked you to stop. You may very well be right. But this is not the way to prove it. Just a little FYI edit warring is vandalism in its own way. I choose to discuss it with you instead of reporting you because I respect your opinion, even though I disagree with you on several points. If you would care to discuss it in a civilized manner I would more than welcome your insights. But do not assume that because I disagree with you that I am on some sort of crusade. I have reverted your changes because I disagree with you. And you can bet you ass I would revert any of the above mentioned just as quickly if I felt that they were editing against consensus. - 4twenty42o (talk) 04:59, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
OK I am done trying to be reasonable with you. It is obvious to me that you are not editing from a neutral point of view and are choosing to edit war for the hell of it. I apologize for wasting both of our time with this. If you would like to make constructive changes, by all means, do so. If you continue to edit against consensus and edit war I will report you. I do not know which way that will go but I will do so anyway. I wish you the best of luck and I truly hope that some day you will join us. - 4twenty42o (talk) 05:15, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
If you question my integrity, then by all means, report me. I welcome the criticism of my peers at any time. I have no agenda and I have no more time for you. Cheers - 4twenty42o (talk) 05:40, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
You are aware of the thread about this scenario at ANI right?--The Shower Singer (talk) 05:50, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

For your interest[edit]

Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/All_current_discussions#Egoists_.28individualist_anarchists.29 Zazaban (talk) 21:48, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Anarchism and sex/love[edit]

There ought to be something about Anarchism and BDSM. There's some sources over at WP:ATF in the workstation. Zazaban (talk) 20:36, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

I just came by to thank you for writing this article.I found it very enjoyable and informative to read, and I hope you will continue writing such articles :)  Skomorokh  00:40, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Influence and reception of Friedrich Nietzsche[edit]

I have nominated Category:Influence and reception of Friedrich Nietzsche (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for merging into Category:Friedrich Nietzsche (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — ξxplicit 05:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009[edit]

Information.svg Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. otherlleft 12:31, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Individualism[edit]

I am rather looking forward to this. I've put the page on my watchlist. I've always been something of a dandy myself, and my favorite anarchists are Emma Goldman and Oscar Wilde. Also, Emma's quote about astristocratic anarchism is one of my favorites. Anarchy is a world where everyone is an aristocrat. Zazaban (talk) 17:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

By the way, I've been thinking of changing the article on decadence so as to include mentions of positive usages of the word, I'll let you know how I do with that. Zazaban (talk) 17:55, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
I have managed to add sections on dandies, and on the decedent movement. The intro is still largely critical. Zazaban (talk) 18:35, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Come to think of it, free love the Counterculture of the 1960s, especially the Youth International Party and the Situationist International, and possibly the avant-garde should all probably have some mention in Individualism. Zazaban (talk) 07:45, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

RABM[edit]

Hello there! I've proposed some corrections for your edits to Black metal article, take a look on it. Let's work together! Black Kronstadt (talk) 02:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Noticed this one, left a comment on the talk page. Strange, I always thought there were quite a few anarchist black metal groups. Zazaban (talk) 19:40, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Decadence[edit]

I've been doing some work over at decadence, changed the highly negative tone and added sections on dandies and the decadent movement. Wondered if you would like to help. Perhaps some more recent examples, I can't think of anything. Perhaps rave culture. Zazaban (talk) 10:02, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

I was more interested in expanding the much neglected positive sense of the word, such as used by Oscar Wilde. I have added a section on rock music. Zazaban (talk) 10:43, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Dandies[edit]

Info talk.png

Category:Dandies, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Good Ol’factory (talk) 07:53, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Anarchism GAN[edit]

Hi, As you may be aware, I'm assessing the anarchism article after it was nominated as a good article. A couple of the points I have identified are related to material you have added. Basically I think your additions are good, but GA status requires a bit more referencing. Also the CNT poster needs a new tag re its copyright status. Thanks.--Peter cohen (talk) 17:17, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Anarchism and Friedrich Nietzsche - GA ready?[edit]

Just looking over this article and wondering if you would be willing to push it through the GA process. I think it meets, if not exceeds, the standards. If it doesn't, the task force should be able to assist as a follow up to the recent Anarchism GA listing. --Cast (talk) 01:33, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Anarchism and Direct Action[edit]

Hi, i'd just like to know your reason for putting an Anarchism sidebar on the direct action page please. As although Anarchists may use direct action direct action doesn't neccessarily mean anarchy?? thanks --Allie Cabab (talk) 19:45, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Individualist anarchist legacy[edit]

Agreed Zazaban (talk) 20:25, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

5 cents-worth of free advice[edit]

Not throwing your bizarre belief that anarchocapitalism isn't a form of anarchism into every single discussion would certainly help you be taken more seriously. Honestly, putting "anarcho" in quotes like that? Makes you look childish. But feel free to continue your rage against anyone who has a penny more than you do. Just please know that talk page discussions are not the place to air your hate for anyone who has a penny more than you do; they are for discussing the article. - Knight of BAAWA (talk) 03:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

History of anarchism[edit]

Since you are very good at it, I was wondering if you'd be interested in helping with this article. I tried to fix it awhile back, but I could only do so much. I managed to sort it into something chronological, and fixed a lot of grammar. It's currently quite terrible and sparse still. You are better than Santa Claus when it comes to improving articles. :D I don't mean to lean on you, of course, but I thought I should point it out. Zazaban (talk) 20:45, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Thoreau and anarchism[edit]

Some time back, you created a subsection in the Thoreau article about his influence on anarchism. This subsection should be expanded with better sources. Specifically, there is a quote in the first paragraph for which I can find no reference. It is possible that subsequent edits have removed the reference, though I cannot find the change in the history. Can you take a look at it and tell me if you recall where that quote came from. The Emma Goldman quote needs a ref. as well, if you know the source. Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 16:48, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Anarchism and sex/love[edit]

Info talk.png

Category:Anarchism and sex/love, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 06:40, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Template:Anarchism sidebar. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. http://infoshop.org/page/AnarchistFAQSectionA1#seca13

"A.1.3 Why is anarchism also called libertarian socialism?" Lenerd (talk) 23:59, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

council communism, left communism, freudo-marxism and autonomism are also libertarian socialist currents but all of them happen to be marxist currents. this is why libertarian socialism cannot be said to be an anarchist "school".--Eduen (talk) 01:33, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Libertarian socialism[edit]

I disagree that being influenced by Marx means it can't be anarchist. It is the "Anarchism sidebar" not the "Bakuninist sidebar." I would be hard pressed to find one who can reconcile libertarian socialism with dictatorship of the proletariat. Lenerd (talk) 01:47, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Synthesis anarchism[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Synthesis anarchism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shadowjams (talk) 09:52, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Anarcho-communism[edit]

The addition you made to the article is very fascinating and useful, well done. On another note, why is Isaac Asimov the picture next to the sceptic userbox? Is he famous for being a sceptic? Best wishes, ValenShephard (talk) 18:54, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Notice of discussion[edit]

You were mentioned in passing at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Discussion_of_Scope_at_Talk:Libertarianism and may wish to attend to it. Fifelfoo (talk) 01:04, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Oscar Wilde - why I removed the politics section (again)[edit]

Hi Eduen,

I noticed your of edits re-adding a politics section to the Wilde article, I've reverted them, but since you've clearly a strong interest in this topic you deserve an explanation why. Firstly, a section such as this did exist before and it was merged into the article further up: Oscar Wilde#Essays and dialogues contains an account and analysis of Wilde's writing in that form. Thus Soul of Man is given space relative to its consideration in biographical and critical sources on Wilde, and with WP:SS.

Secondly, a separate section for one aspect of his writing breaks with the structure of the article, which weaves biography and criticism and accounts for works chronologically. Why should "politics" have a separate section as opposed to sexuality, nationality or sporting views? Have a look at the essay by Geoffrey Wheatcroft, "Not Green, Not Red, Not Pink" (The Atlantic Monthly, May 2003) which cautions against allowing Wilde to be adopted as an icon by various causes.

Thirdly, the information you've added contains only one reliable source, and that paragraph was copied from the Soul of Man article. That article is a better place for full discussion of the philosophical themes in Wilde's essay. (For example see this complaint by the GA reviewer)

I've been thinking about working on an article on one of Wilde's works now that the main article is essentially full - at 10,000 words it needs polishing in a hundred small ways rather than expansion with new material. The Soul of Man under Socialism is one of my favourite Wildean works, let me know if you're interested in working on it seriously, up to GA or FA level.

Best wishes, --Ktlynch (talk) 14:45, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Generally one responds where the discussion started[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Eduen. You have new messages at Ktlynch's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Anarchism[edit]

One of your edits has an unknown reference. Would you mind fixing this if possible? Thanks. –CWenger (talk) 16:51, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, Eduen. Please check your email – you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Templates[edit]

Hello, just letting you know that there's no need to write the word "Template:" when calling a template. Just call it like this: {{template name}}. Graham87 14:58, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for your editorial work in the constellation of articles surrounding anarchism. Thank you. You make the encyclopaedia better. Fifelfoo (talk) 22:49, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Émile Armand[edit]

Hello Eduen. I was wondering if you know where did Armand publish his Petit Manuel Anarchiste Individualiste. Please answer in my talk page at my home wiki. Best regards, --Georgez (talk) 20:19, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Non-English references for Miguel Giménez Igualada[edit]

I notice that you have added text and many references to this article, all of which I can see are not in English. This is English Wikipedia where refs have to be understandable to the average English speaker and reader. If you wish your additions to this article to remain, please find adequate references in English. Thank you. Acabashi (talk) 21:38, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Hippie exploitation films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Mann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hippie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Human Sexual Response
Libertarian socialism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to James Harrington

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Libertarianism, lede, definition[edit]

Please reconsider your removal of Long's definition from the Lede of Libertarianism. It supplies an academic, ie High Quality reliable source, definition that spans the entire topic. This is rather remarkable given the inward focused, and silo'd, literary and scholarly traditions that speak past each other. (cf: the fucking poor quality of Peter Vallentyne's definition in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Please do also try to skim the archives. Long's definition is open, scholarly, and has been subject to review. Long uniquely positions himself as a scholar of all libertarianisms when writing academically. He's no Ward, but he's the best contemporary we have. The additional advantage of citing and quoting Long is that there is no synthesis or original research in doing so. Fifelfoo (talk) 08:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

  • This is what happens when Long's open definition disappears from the lede. Fifelfoo (talk) 02:15, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Anarchism in Argentina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Libertario (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Template:Anarchism sidebar[edit]

Since when is the symbol you prefer the consensus? Or is it that punks "give (you) a bad name"? I suppose an orderly, dogmatic institution like Wikipedia should restrict itself to "classy" representations of any item, regardless of its dependence on "class" with its own definition. You know the symbol is derived from an inverted pentacle, with the added symbolism of "drawing outside the lines", right? Consensus here is irrelevant if it can't be cited from elsewhere. The symbol, as you reverted to, was apparently designed by committee specifically for Wikipedia, and without the "historically" (recent or otherwise) symbolism. No, and no. 70.15.11.44 (talk) 03:54, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Anarchism and education, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gymnasium, Sex Education and Paul Goodman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
For creating the excellent article Anarchism and education. SupernovaExplosion Talk 11:51, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Individualism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metaphysical (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Criticisms of social anarchism?[edit]

Thanks for setting me straight on the "criticisms of anarchism" article (i thought the other material was "criticisms of social anarchism" specifically and not criticisms of anarchism in general because those sections used to be listed that way).

I'm wondering if you're interested in making (or helping me make or expanding once I make it) a "criticisms of social anarchism" article. I suppose this would mostly consist of ancap writers. The article we have critiquing ancap is pretty well done, so it seems like it's time for a "criticisms of social anarchism" article. What do you think? Do you have any ideas for what the article should be like?

Thanks. Byelf2007 (talk) 22 March 2012

Individualist anarchism and social anarchism?[edit]

I'm thinking that making a "individualist anarchism and social anarchism" page would be a little easier to tackle first. It's also a long overdue article. I've been combing this site (http://anarchism.pageabode.com/afaq/index.html) for helpful info. Any suggestions would help. Thanks. Byelf2007 (talk) 19 May 2012

What is mutualism?[edit]

The current article says (in the title) that it's an "economic theory", but from what I've read, it's actually a school of anarchist thought/moral stance/political philosophy, which is what the article has said since I first read it (I think). Should we get rid of the "economic theory" in the title? Byelf2007 (talk) 21 May 2012

off topic comments belong here[edit]

in addition, plz http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith. this is the second time you have suggested my edits do not belong on wp. this behavior may be considered disruptive and could result in a loss of your editing privileges. the next time you want to express an opinion of another editor, plz dont, or do it here or on their talk page. if possible, focus on the topic, not the editor. plz don't take this a rebuke, you are still relatively new and it takes awhile to learn all the mechanics of wp, cheers! Darkstar1st (talk) 23:27, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Post-anarchism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Day (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Recent anarchism edit[edit]

Why shouldn't libertarianism template be in article? And what part of the talkpage are you referring to? Thanks. Byelf2007 (talk) 7 November 2012

Libertarianism template[edit]

I'd like you to check out my 'Schools' entry on the libertarianism talk page. Byelf2007 (talk) 9 November 2012

Disambiguation link notification for December 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Culture of Ecuador, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Otavalo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Fellow anarchist[edit]

Hello there! Nice to have your contributions on the Libertarianism article! It sounds like you are an anarchist as well, so I figured I'd stop by and maybe have a bit of a chat. If not, my bad.  :D Do you belong to any organizations? Or is there a specific flavor of anarchism you follow?

I'm extremely fond of Bookchin's Social Ecology, but I usually support anarchism without adjectives. Solidarity, brother!  ;) Unfortunately, I live in a very conservative (and that odd US-libertarian) part of the USA, so I don't have many folks around here with whom I can connect. I'm hoping to move west in a year or so and get involved with anarchist activism. I've been looking into this group called the Workers Solidarity Alliance and they seem awesome... at least, from what I've read thus far. Do you know anything about them? Or, I guess I should ask if you live in the USA first, huh?  :P Anyway, thanks for your time! Have a great day! -- MisterDub (talk | contribs) 18:03, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles Fourier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Harvey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harold Acton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dilettante (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

WP:EXCEPTIONAL[edit]

You edit to List of anarchist organizations has been reverted. Any exceptional claim requires exceptional sources. Toddst1 (talk) 23:48, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information, unverifiable or poorly sourced exceptional claims or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at List of anarchist organizations ‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Relax. My response at Talk:List_of_anarchist_organizations#To_user_Toddst1.--Eduen (talk) 00:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --I am One of Many (talk) 07:33, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Requesting opinion[edit]

Hi, in my opinion an editor has hijacked the gift economy article and among other things deleted valuable content that you entered. He has done this without discussion and explanation. I currently am in a content dispute with him, so I'd like to ask if could come an revert his unwarranted delete. And if you'd like, to give imput also on the dispute in the discussion. Thanks Tpylkkö (talk) 09:46, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Biennio Rosso, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Roma and Feltrinelli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

God and you[edit]

I have learned for myself that your beliefs and political ideology are not true. The wrong shall fail, the right prevail, with peace on earth, good will to men! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.187.97.22 (talk) 00:14, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

mmm. Whatever. i will keep aligned with Satan, paganism and hedonism.--Eduen (talk) 00:51, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Commonwealth (book), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Singularity and David Harvey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:30, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Anarchism in England (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to CNT and Fascist Italy
Libertarian Marxism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Thought reform

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:26, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anarchism in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mutual bank (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:15, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antonio Negri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Singularity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anarchism and issues related to love and sex, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sex Education (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anarchism in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Squats (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Gatekeeping Anarchism Article[edit]

You seem to be gatekeeping the anarchism page. You keep reverting edits of unreliable sources. Please note that Wikipedia RS policy on self-published source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SPS#Self-published_sources

"Anyone can create a personal web page or publish their own book, and also claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published media, such as books, patents, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, personal or group blogs (as distinguished from newsblogs, above), Internet forum postings, and tweets, are largely not acceptable as sources."

I am removing Daibhidh's Anarcho-Hucksters: There is Nothing Anarchistic about Capitalism because it is not a reliable source. It is anonymous, self-published, and violates Wiki POV policy. I am removing Ecology or “Anarcho”-capitalism? because it is also self-published, thereby violating Wiki RS policy.

Your fingerprints are all over Wiki anarchy pages, including your edits to "Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed". Please do not revert my edits again. These sources are patently in violation of Wiki policy. You are clearly here to insert your own POV. 76.121.49.108 (talk) 18:10, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drug liberalization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the socialist movement in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Socialist Workers Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anarchism in France, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Libertad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Étienne de La Boétie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Holloway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Anarchist communism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to OpenOffice
Anarchist economics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to OpenOffice

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Counterculture of the 1960s may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ], Mouvement communiste libertaire, Union fédérale des anarchistes, Alliance ouvrière anarchiste], Union des groupes anarchistes communistes, Noir et Rouge, [[Confédération nationale du travail]],
  • |url=http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/6595610/1_sgt_peppers_lonely_hearts_club_band |title=1) Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band |publisher=Rolling Stone |date=2003-11-01 |accessdate=2009-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:26, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of socialism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thought reform (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Socialism[edit]

Please add missing references >>> see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Socialism&diff=576667598&oldid=576665232 --Frze > talk 06:06, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Please add ref[edit]

ref name="Anarchism 1962" see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_socialism&diff=prev&oldid=575109914 thanks --Frze > talk 06:47, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

ref name="public.federation-anarchiste.org" see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_socialism&diff=prev&oldid=575112976 --Frze > talk 06:49, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

ref name="robertgraham.wordpress.com" see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_socialism&diff=prev&oldid=575111758 --89.204.139.203 (talk) 07:57, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

ref name="carson" see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_socialist_movement_in_the_United_States&diff=prev&oldid=560236234 --Frze > talk 09:28, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

A reference problem Anarchist economics[edit]

Hi! Some users have been working hard on Category:Pages with broken reference names.

Here you added a new reference ref name=Mises but didn't define it. This has been showing as an error at the bottom of the article. Cite error: The named reference was invoked but never defined. Can you take a look and work out what you were trying to do? Thanks --Frze (talk · contribs) 19:12, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antonio Gramsci, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stuart Hall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Disc sports (Frisbee)[edit]

Hello, disc sports did come from hippies in the sixties and was considered to be mostly an alternative sport. You're right I didn't reference that in the writing. If I rewrite this with hippie references do you think this would fit in with this article or not? I wasn't putting this under politics, I was putting this after Politics and before Drugs. Thanks Audra454 (talk) 11:32, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Libertarianism article discussion[edit]

There is a discussion at the libertarism article (which I'm roughly neutral on) which I would think someone of your left-libertarian expertise could help on. There is a short statement in the lead that some libertarians reject capitalism. Is this an accurate statement? It is being challenged for sourcing which directly supports that statement. There is nothing in the body of the article about left libertarians and capitalism. If the statement is accurate, I would think that someone with knowledge of left libertarianism could put sourced coverage of that into the body of the article. An if not, of course it should be removed. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 02:39, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Refusal of work may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{Libertarian socialism |Concepts}} )

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:20, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Edit summary needed[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes.

Thanks! Frze > talk 16:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Stop hand nuvola.svg

Use Preview button[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to History of the socialist movement in the United States , it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. --Frze > talk 16:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

April 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Libertine may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • The [libertine novel]] was an [[18th century in literature|18th century literary genre]] of which the roots lay in the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Libertarian Youth may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • organization<ref name=fijl/> it decides to name itself "Iberian Youth of Anarchist Youth" (spa: '''Federación Ibérica de Juventudes Anarquistas''' or FIJA but knwing that they are the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:02, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Insurrectionary anarchism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • organization<ref name=fijl/> it decides to name itself "Iberian Youth of Anarchist Youth" (spa: ''Federación Ibérica de Juventudes Anarquistas'' or FIJA but knwing that they are the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:10, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anarchism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:35, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Individualist anarchism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:54, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Individualist anarchism in the United States may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Bosses, Inequality, Corporate Power, and Structural Poverty''. Minor Compositions; 1st edition (November 5, 2011</ref>, [[Anti-corporatism|anti-corporatist]], anti-hierarchical, pro-labor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:56, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


April 2014[edit]

If you want to be successful in gaining support for your proposed edits, then I suggest that you attempt to work with people in a more collaborative way and try to gain consensus for your edits, rather than insulting them. I asked a very simple question of you: whether there were reliable sources which explicitly connected your proposed content to the subject of the article — since you have added paragraphs of material relating to individual anarchism to the libertarianism article. Libertarianism, the subject of the article, is not mentioned in the the content that you added to the article. In response to my simple, appropriate request, you wrote:

"...Clearly user Goethean doesn´t know very much about the subject of this article...User Goethean, please inform yourself by visiting the main 'individualist anarchism' article."[1]
"...relax and inform yourself better about individualist anarchism".[2]

Likewise, I suggest that you speak to people in a more civil manner, and that you follow Wikipedia policy. You did not gain consensus on the talk page for your edit, your edit did not mention the subject of the article, and when asked to cite a source, you respond with insults. This bizarre behavior is a good way to make people who would support your edits to instead oppose them.

It doesn't matter if you think that you are an expert on libertarianism or anarchism, or if you think that I am stupid. Wikipedia is built on reliable sources, not on your unsupported claims of expertise. — goethean 17:00, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

"this user opposes work"[edit]

Hi. First of all, I like to say I agree with a large amount of your views expressed on your userpage, excepting maybe the some of the anarchist ones. I was confused by a template that just says "this user opposes work". What does that mean? Does that mean you think people should sit around all day and do nothing? Or that people should work for themselves and not be the "employees" of anyone? Could you explain your take on this? Fungal vexation (talk) 16:29, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 25 April[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Left-wing market anarchism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mutualism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Al Bunker[edit]

Eduen, I wouldn't worry about responding to Al Bunker: it's just Lockean One announcing his return in his typical, unsubstantiated, biased fashion. -- MisterDub (talk | contribs) 13:37, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 13 May[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Your revert on Libertarian socialism template[edit]

Hi, I put the "Events" section into chronological order, and your edit just reverted that work. Why wouldn't you want the events section to be listed chronologically? Also, the "People" section does not make any sense to me in chronological order, is it by birth year or by some other significant event in their lives? I think it would be helpful if other editors besides yourself could tell how that section is ordered. Your edit also reverted some edits where the link to the article's page has changed. Please explain why you think these edits should not be corrected. Funandtrvl (talk) 17:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Diversity of Tactics[edit]

Hey Eduen, I'm looking for folks to review an article that I've just submitted. I saw your name on the Emma Goldman page history and thought you might be interested. Best,GPRamirez5 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 18:09, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anationalism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • sus diferentes secciones la más destacada de las cuales será el grupo excursionista Sol y Vida."[http://www.nodo50.org/ekintza/article.php3?id_article=310 http://www.acracia.org/1-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:18, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fukpig[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Fukpig has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has no reliable sources for its history, discography, members, genre or origin. The band itself has received little to no coverage from reliable sources and I don't see a reason to why this is such a high-priority band, the members aren't that big of a deal, they have no legacy, and their record label is nothing particularly special either, so I'm confused to as why this is such a high priority article. For these reasons I believe this article should be deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SilentDan297 talk 19:19, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Removal of info from Libertarianism article[edit]

Eduen, I was leaving those claims in the Libertarianism article with "citation needed" templates because they are accurate, but need expansion. Without them, the article is narrow and biased. I was hoping other editors with more knowledge of right-libertarian sources would address these, but if not, I will add the material. Until then, can we please leave those claims in the article as notifications for areas that need improvement? Thanks! -- MisterDub (talk | contribs) 17:32, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

You have been active at the article or talk page, so here's a note about Anarcho-capitalism[edit]

I have nominated Anarcho-capitalism for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Binksternet (talk) 18:15, 29 July 2014 (UTC)