I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing Army Black Knights women's basketball, Ejgreen77.
Unfortunately Kudpung has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
As a holder of autopatolled rights, could you please add references to this article as soon as possible. Thanks.
To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.
TfD re Infobox college football player
EJ, assuming the present TfD closes as a "keep" as presently seems likely, I will recruit a template editor and solicit input from WP:CFB for an updated and improved version of the CFB player infobox. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:06, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- EJ, please talk a look at proposed revised template: . There's a talk page discussion for comments -- we need to get your input. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 04:00, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
I agree with several of the observations that you made here: . That's why the three Ivy League navboxes were nominated separately from those for the AAC, ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and SEC -- because the Ivy League grad schools are situated somewhat differently based on popular perception (and there are stand-alone lists for these three per WP:NAVBOX, unlike the others). The other conference navboxes were clearly delete-bait, but we did not want the potential "Ivy League" argument to derail the argument for deleting the rest of the bunch. These three Ivy League navboxes were nominated primarily for the sake of equal treatment for all, and I could have seen this TfD going either way. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:18, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Template:Carlisle Indians football navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ...William 09:43, 11 March 2015 (UTC)