User talk:Eklir

Speedy deletion of Albrecht Goetze

A tag has been placed on Albrecht Goetze requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PookeyMaster (talk) 06:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

This article has been expanded in the meantime. Thanks. Eklir (talk) 22:10, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandalisms by 68.81.125.26

I have edited or reverted a number of vandalisms by the anonymous user 68.81.125.26 for resorting to unmotivated deleting and hostile counter-claims in creolistics and John McWhorter. His IP might have to be blocked. Eklir (talk) 22:10, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Citation Barnstar
		Awarded for sourcing efforts at articles related to Creole languages, especially Creole language. Keep it up!

Hi

I see you are the one who originally placed the information concerning English on the Relexification article [1]. However, over on the discussion at Talk:Maltese language, a user invented his own definition of what relexification was, removing what you wrote (in order to fit his argument about what "relexification" was over at the Maltese language discussion), at which point I told him that he was "not able to simply start altering definitions of linguistic processes to fit your [his] incorrect argument," and in response, I was told that since he has "a PhD in linguistics and specialize in historical linguistics", "I AM [he IS] qualified to make such edits". I hope you will be able to help me deal with this user, since not only is he exhibiting sheer arrogance in claiming he has the right to do this, but is vastly incorrect, and seems persistent in his views. Cheers. 78.149.202.191 (talk) 17:13, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Use of English on WPE

This discussion has been tranferred to the relevant talk page, here. Thank you. Eklir (talk) 01:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Please note that this discussion has been moved to the appropriate talk page of the offending contributor. Thank you. Eklir (talk) 05:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Battle of Petrovaradin

This discussion has been tranferred to the relevant talk page. Please leave your comments here. Thank you. Eklir (talk) 09:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Hey, there is a new message! Doncsecz 18:17, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

tb

Hello, Eklir. You have new messages at Doncsecz's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Notification of WA

Hello. I have opened a section on your actions on the Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#user:Eklir page. I hope the community can give some insights on the strong disagreement between us. Thank you for your suggestion. --grin ✎ 21:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

You are most welcome. Eklir (talk) 21:02, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Demanding English sources

This discussion has been tranferred to the relevant talk page. Please leave your comments here. There is also an ongoing debate on related wikiquette issues here where you are invited to contribute. Thank you. Eklir (talk) 21:02, 21 November 2008 (UTC)