User talk:Elliot jeter

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to James F. Byrnes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 13:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Blacksburg, South Carolina, you will be blocked from editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 13:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Blacksburg, South Carolina, you will be blocked from editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 13:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elliot jeter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just seeing what Wikipedia could do. I just didn't believe that this really edited the real page. Please give me one more chance to be unblocked. I will only do constructive edits from now on, if any. Please give me one more chance.

Decline reason:

You were clearly warned about your edits. However, I've reduced your block time. Take the next two days to read up on Wikipedia policy. Edit constructively when your block lifts or you'll just be reblocked. — Lara❤Love 14:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.