User talk:Enda Caldwell

Image tagging for Image:Atlantic252.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Atlantic252.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:05, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Themfromspace (talk) 01:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Banner-enda.jpg)[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Banner-enda.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGa^talk 02:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re:Orphaned non-free image (Image:Banner-enda.jpg)[edit]

Hello, I own this image and it is a free image and I have given full permission for the logo to be used on wikipedia in the article Enda Caldwell Can you please make the necessary changes to it and re-instate it in the article? It is a free image I own. Please help.It will be useful to the article I believe. Thanks, Enda Caldwell --Enda Caldwell (talk) 18:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Enda Caldwell[edit]

I have nominated Enda Caldwell, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enda Caldwell. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. JaGa^talk 02:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: AfD nomination of Enda Caldwell[edit]

Please, I am appealing for your help in cleaning up my autobiography Enda Caldwell and getting it to a point where the few sources I have provided are verified and it is taken off this removed for deletion warning. I am really asking for help from all of you who may read this page. Thank you very sincerely, Enda.--Enda Caldwell (talk) 17:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Enda. First I want to say I'm sorry if you feel like you're under attack or something like that. You've been very civil through all this and the last thing I want is for you to think I bear you ill will. It's just that I don't feel the article meets WP:ENTERTAINER. However, I do think the article could pass if you could give a reference showing a large following for the radio program - and mention it in the AfD. I won't be sorry if my nomination fails. :) --JaGa^talk 18:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I have tried to explain what you required me to about the audiences.. Enda Caldwell--Enda Caldwell (talk) 02:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Energy 103[edit]

A tag has been placed on Energy 103 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. ww2censor (talk) 01:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Energy 103[edit]

A tag has been placed on Energy 103 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lets drink Tea 22:57, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Energy 103[edit]

A tag has been placed on Energy 103, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 23:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Enda Caldwell may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

He has also voiced radio imaging for other stations including Galway's 958 (an opt-out service for Galway Bay FM, Iur FM in Newry as well as other imaging for stations like

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:53, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Enda Caldwell for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enda Caldwell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enda Caldwell (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Edl-irishboy (talk) 20:09, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Enda Caldwell for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enda Caldwell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enda Caldwell (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Guliolopez (talk) 15:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]