User talk:ErikHaugen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

New Page Patrol survey[edit]


New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello ErikHaugen! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey


Hi, my name is Pedro Rodriguez. I am a student at Michigan State University, working on an exploration of the Wikipedia adminship process under Jonathan Obar. You had previously showed interest in being a interviewee for our study. I can conduct the interview via Skype or email, whichever you prefer. I can be contacted at my email: to set up a time to Skype or , if you wish, to obtain your email to conduct the interview that way. Thank you for your participation in our study. SirGuybrush (talk)

Requested moves (species name decapitalisation)[edit]

Thanks for your moves of bird articles! Here are some more uncontroversial requests: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Articles requested moves. It would be great if you could help. Coreyemotela (talk) 17:01, 10 May 2014 (UTC).

header for anonymous attack[edit]

There is no honor in what you do you act viciously like a Muslim fundamentalist and no like a decent Christian. Also I never hid I'm jungleewang/piachpia accounts. I said it many times that you act like a witch hunter viciously instead to engage in a direct noble and decent debate there is honor in what you do it's not making either rich or noble it makes you turn off people who contribute their time time to edit. I think you are a disaster not only for Wikipedia by depriving it from muggle edits but people like you are disaster for their own families Bcoz you can't fix stupid. You can fix lips and boobs but you can't fix stupidity. Also dude you an embarrassment for google. And an embarrassment for the stars too. I'm a veteran and there is no honor in what you do especiAlly after my effords to contribute to wikipediA which is not your own personal property. Last but not least you are so retarded that I'm not going to waste my time to contribute my time to edit Wikipedia no more but you are a witch hunter and I recommend you read the definitions of paranoia and oppositional defiant disorder Bcoz you got mental problems dude. I'm not offending you I'm simply telling you facts that obvious and I'm trying to help you by improving you — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 22:48, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment[edit]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)


Hi! I see you previously blocked User: and User: Another user User: has just appeared and is doing similar edits to same articles. Sorry if this is in the wrong place. I didn't know if any administrator was aware of this and I thought I should let you know. --Barosaurus Lentus (talk) 14:11, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

You might take this up at SPI, but I don't feel to confident taking action at this point, myself. I'll try to keep an eye on it. Thanks. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 02:08, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Automatic taxobox[edit]


There appears to be some quirky bug in the {{Automatic taxobox}}. At {{Taxonomy/Nandiniidae}}, the parent is listed as "Feliformia", but is showing up in the automatically generated taxonomies as "Felidayayae". Based on the sources I've seen, the former is correct; the latter appears to be some glitch or hoax being perpetrated at Wikipedia. How can we fix this? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:52, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Never mind. Found and fixed. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:56, 25 September 2014 (UTC)