User talk:Ethnic laundry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello Ethnic laundry, and Welcome to Wikipedia!New-Bouncywikilogo.gif

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Ethnic laundry, good luck, and have fun. --Aboutmovies (talk) 06:42, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Gaddang People, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e deckertalk 04:44, 7 May 2013 (UTC)


When adding text to articles, please remember to provide reliable 3rd party references. I don't disagree about the influences on Free Jazz (though see interviews with Cage himself on the subject), but an assertion that people were serious is essentially point-of-view and needs to be grounded in something tangible. AllyD (talk) 06:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

  • And please also use the Edit Summary? It makes it easier for other editors watching article changes. AllyD (talk) 06:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Seconding what AllyD said. One change in particular caught me attention: the lede now says "free jazz is alternately described as an attempt to return jazz to its roots, or to unearth a 'primitive' collective experience." "Alternately described as...," by whom? (See WP:WEASEL.) And is it really just one or the other? Generally, anything set forth in the lede should be corroborated, with sources, somewhere else in the text. That's just the first thing that caught my eye – "Why Free Jazz?" really needs attribution as well. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure why you've reverted the article, as you seem to have acknowledged where AllyD and I are coming from, yet your revert doesn't address any of the WP:V issues. You mentioned that you are "still at work" on this – may I suggest not using the article itself as a working draft (especially until verifiability is resolved)? Your personal history is genuinely intriguing, though I hope you don't mean to draw from this when you work on the article (as it's impossible to verify – please see WP:EXPERTISE). Thanks, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:48, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 27 February[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 01:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)