User talk:EtienneDolet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

TWL HighBeam check-in[edit]

Hello Wikipedia Library Users,

You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

  • Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
  • Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
  • Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you. Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism[edit]

This article:

Turkish_courts-martial_of_1919–20

is being randomly vandalized by different IP's, reverting obsolete information that was discussed in the talk page.

I have reported this. What is the best thing to do? --92slim (talk) 18:30, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

@92slim: Done. See here. Check out what I did so you can learn and handle it yourself in the future. Good catch, Étienne Dolet (talk) 18:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
@92slim: Defense of Van (1915) should be sent to page protection for temporary semi-protection. Try it out. Let's see how much you've learned ;) Étienne Dolet (talk) 19:36, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Picture of the day[edit]

I'm sure you're as much to thank for this as I, if not more. I'm happy to see it. :) MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 12:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Notifying users of WP:ANI discussions[edit]

Whenever you post about another user on WP:ANI (as you did here), you must notify them of the discussion. I have notified the user in question for you this time. Please remember to do this in the future. Thanks! ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 16:56, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

@Nihonjoe: Sorry bout that. I did ping him at ANI, but I guess that's not enough. Will let him know on his talk page next time! Thanks, Étienne Dolet (talk) 16:59, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, there's a giant orange box on the edit page when you post on ANI, indicating that you must notify them on their talk page. Live and learn. :) ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Defense of Van (1915)[edit]

I've changed the protection to last until 26 April. Hope that works. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

ANI[edit]

I have opened an ANI discussion here that may concern you. c1cada (talk) 02:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Issues with articles[edit]

Dear user, Thank you for your message and please inform me if im wrongdoing by discussing this here. I re read the arbcom and the cases against you and for you, while i understand this constant nagging both from Armenian and Azerbaijani side is non-stop and i believe it wont stop. Despite representing Azerbaijani side i clearly want the wikipedia to remain neutral side however this is hard to achieve since most articles tend to be in favor with more active group. Here is my point for arguing why Nagorno Karabagh should be used instead of "Artsakh" i believe a similar issue was with Ararat vs Agri Dagi where the favor was with Ararat since it used more commonly by media and others. Well then same should go here as well since both the official name as well mostly used term is Nagorno Kabagh the feel im getting is that on Armenian articles they can put Artsakh while on neutral Nagorno Karabagh which i believe is wrong since Ararat is in Turkey well then why Turkey doesn't get to do that as well? Well this is my main arguments for the change of Artaskh to N/K i believe its more neutral and is inline with the policy. the edit i made i believe was right and i would to discuss on the reasons why it should be ass i understood similar problems have persistent since 2006-7 Agulani (talk) 07:37, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

My problem isn't with the word Artsakh. Your edit included a segment which referred to the 'de jure part of Azerbaijan Republic'. Although that may be true, we should much rather adopt a more neutral term by just saying Nagorno-Karabakh. Also, please go back to the talk page of Henrikh Mkhitaryan if you want to continue this discussion. I appreciate it. Étienne Dolet (talk) 07:41, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Istanbul Armenian Genocide memorial[edit]

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:17, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

any clue?[edit]

Any clue who added the name "Mar'ou'a" to the Persian translation here? [1] One of the languages I speak is Persian, and absolutely no one refers to it as Mar'ou'a or even knows what it means. Everyone just refers to it as "Lavash", and that's how it's written there correctly as well before that strange word.

Wanna know what you think about it.

- LouisAragon (talk) 11:49, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

@LouisAragon: I have no idea. It's best to remove it until someone can provide a source. Étienne Dolet (talk) 14:57, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Yep, I had exactly the same in mind ;) Just did so. Thanks for your opinion. LouisAragon (talk) 15:30, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

TWL Questia check-in[edit]

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

  • Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
  • When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
  • Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
  • Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks!
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Raymond Damadian.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Raymond Damadian.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 19:06, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

@ESkog: Well that's embarrassing. I totally thought he was dead. You have a right to nominate it for deletion on those grounds. Maybe I can find a PD picture elsewhere. Étienne Dolet (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
No worries. It's certainly an easy mistake to make. Sorry for the cold template! (ESkog)(Talk) 00:02, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

TWL Questia check-in[edit]

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

  • Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
  • When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
  • Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
  • Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks! Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of National Names 2000 10:35, 12 May 2015 (UTC)