User talk:Euroflux

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

m:User Talk:Euroflux
b:User Talk:Euroflux



Metawiki Talk




Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Corps of Armament Engineers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

K7L (talk) 16:41, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Grand Corps of the French State, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:13, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello! Euroflux, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:13, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Alain Bugat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sionk (talk) 18:22, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Jean-Paul Herteman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CharlieEchoTango (contact) 02:01, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Henri Martre, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Guillaume2303 (talk) 11:21, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for showing a battleground mentality and a general unwillingness to work in a collegial fashion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:50, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Euroflux (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

My activity on en:Wikipedia mainly consists in writing articles in my sandbox where there is no battleground at all. Those articles are biographies of notable French engineers and chief executives (living) and professional descriptions of the French engineering system. I feel - rightly or wrongly - that I am a little bit knowledgeable in this field. I have made use of the AFC reviewing process which shows no special battleground mentality.

5 of my articles have been accepted, one of them already nominated for some criteria for level B. As you can see 21 articles are in my sandbox "to be improved", either rejected by the AFC process, or not yet ready to be put in the AFC reviewing process. In another subpage of my sand box I am categorizing French engineers by Corps, by school and by specialty.

Please have a look ; this is a huge piece of work, all the more since I am doing this in parallel for the French, German, Russian, Swedish Wikipedias. My account Euroflux is exclusively dedicated to Aerospace engineering and Economics of innovation ; this is a "professional" account. As a human person, I have many other fields of interest, languages, anthropology, ethnonoly, religion, freediving, but I forbid myself to edit in those other fields in order to avoid confusion. I discovered only very recently the potentiality of the "sandbox" and as you can see I am now mainly active in my sandbox and its subpages. By definition and by construction there may be no conflict in my sandboxes since I am the only user, if I understood right the Wikipedia rules. As you can see, I created other subpages of my sandbox for aeronautics industry and for economics of innovation, all of those sandbox subpages being built in parallel for at least the English, French, German, Russian, Swedish Wikipedia.

I had been asked last August on the German Wikipedia to make a global presentation of my categorizing trees but I had been unable to do this at that time partly due to the language and due to the fact as well that I did not master at that time the “sandbox”. As a result, the (= Category:Aerospace engineers), existing in 25 different Wikis…) had been removed. Amazingly enough, this category had been assessed appropriate, but it had to be removed because there had not been a prior consensus obtained before. The (= Category:Space agencies), had been removed as well ; the argument that this category exists in 45 different wikis had not been considered sufficient. Germans consider that it is irrelevant whether the category is correct or not. They focus on the process ; the (= Category:Space agencies) should have been decided with consensus.

My working in my sandboxes is therefore an excellent way to avoid any kind of conflict. I am working very fast and this speed frightens people a little bit. If I work directly on the categorizing tree, it is too quick for people to understand. On the 30th of July I was blocked on the French Wikipedia because some people thought that I was making a wrong tree. They were no category “specialists”. After my blocking, a “category” specialist examined my categories and he stated that 95% was correct ; the only removed categories were “Ingénieur aéronautique français vivant” (living) and “Ingénieur aéronautique français décédé” (deceased).

I recently broke my own rule of "only aeronautics and economics of innovation". I wrote the biography of Alain Bugat, a former boss of mine. He had undergone the reviewing process and had been accepted. The banner “Autobiography” was added on his page, which was rather insulting for me. I felt insulted and this made me think immediately of the biography of Florence Devouard. If you have a look at the , and if you can read French, the autobiographical character is pretty obvious. It took me 30 seconds to add the banner "Autobiography" on FD's page and it was over ! I went back to my work. I would never had put the banner "Autobiography" on Florence Devouard's page if this banner had not been put previously on Alain Bugat's biography !

The problem is that the banner "Autobiography" was removed in a rough, almost threatening way... Guillaume2303 called this a "personal attack" against Florence Devouard, which forced me to justify the banner... I would never have written these long justifications if I had not been requested to ! I just made the remark that this shows a double standard policy on Wikipedia... Tougher rules regarding "notability" are applied to people outside Wikipedia than to insiders.

This was an obvious big mistake of mine to add the "Autobiography" banner on FD's bio. It was an obviously sensitive issue, almost a “blasphemy”, and it is none of my business.

Again I 99% work in my sandbox on my articles, and on my categorizing trees for French engineers, Aeronautics industry, and Economics of innovation.

My newly acquired working method allows me to work very fast and in a peaceful context since on my sandbox, I am not obliged to justify every step of this long lasting work. My work is done in a meta-wiki perspective.

I really have no objection to every Wikimedia employee having their biography on Wikipedia ; again, my adding the “Autobiography” banner was nothing but a reaction to Alain Bugat receiving this banner. And my long justifications were done on request.

I request to get the possibility to continue my long lasting work in my sandboxes. The value of this work has already been at least partially demonstrated. Euroflux (talk) 15:03, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

After reading this discussion about you on AN/I and seeing your behavior in this CfD there is absolutely nothing in your request above that leads me to believe that you will behave yourself from now on. — Hex (❝?!❞) 09:45, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page for as long as you are blocked.

Octagon delete.svg
This blocked user (block log | active blocks | autoblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs | abuse log) has had their talk page access revoked because an administrator has identified this user's talkpage edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. If you would like to make further requests, you may contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:15, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:Sociology of innovation[edit]

Category:Sociology of innovation, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 03:30, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marwan Lahoud concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marwan Lahoud, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:24, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AeroSpace and Defence Industries Association of Europe concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AeroSpace and Defence Industries Association of Europe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:00, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yves Sillard concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yves Sillard, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 16:41, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marwan Lahoud[edit]

Hello Euroflux. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Marwan Lahoud".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marwan Lahoud}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:03, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

da:Brugerdiskussion:Euroflux de:Kategorie:Raumfahrtagentur es:Usuario discusión:Euroflux fr:Discussion:Florence Devouard ko:사용자토론:Euroflux ja:利用者‐会話:Euroflux ru:Обсуждение участника:Euroflux sv:Användardiskussion:Euroflux

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yves Sillard concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yves Sillard, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:54, 15 June 2014 (UTC)