User talk:EvergreenFir

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Independent Information[edit]

This page is unambiguously promotional.However, every time I try and make a page that isn't promotional you delete me while I'm making the page. I'm trying to create a page about my company as a lot of my interns coming from england find it hard to understand the russian website. The page is factual not promotional. Promotional implies bias which it isn't. If you feel I written biased info tell where it is and I'll delete it. I keep having my page deleted by different "monitors" and so I'm to explain myself ever time. Could please help/ Advise me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! yours Independent informtion

Titles of Refs[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, EvergreenFir. You have new messages at Sunnydoo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, EvergreenFir. You have new messages at Sunnydoo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: Talk page FAQs[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, EvergreenFir. You have new messages at CAWylie's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

What the Heck[edit]

My information was true considering the fact that a news report confirmed it, so they had no business deleting it, because either way it was true,they probably didn't even try searching it up! Here's the report: http://www.newsnet5.com/entertainment/celebrity/nicki-minaj-gets-animated-for-steven-universe_09416171

If they were following the rules then they could have easily done some research to see if it was true or not. I did.So I hope they got a notification too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emarldquatz (talkcontribs)

The talk page didn't have any one talking about confirmation on dates that's why I didn't bother! and I did give a source that apparently wasn't "reliable" but yet a News website confirmed it, making what I wrote true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emarldquatz (talkcontribs)

Thank you[edit]

Thank you! that's all I wanted! fans have been waiting for this information for 3 months. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emarldquatz (talkcontribs)


Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello, EvergreenFir. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CSDarrow (talkcontribs)

I reverted your edit[edit]

On Manosphere because the subreddit itself is a primary source and cannot be used for interpretation of their own views, but for most basic statements of fact, ie: The subscriber count. We don't need a brand new RS to update the count, and if we did, would be incredibly bureaucratic. I checked the subreddit and the IP's edit was correct. Tutelary (talk) 03:01, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Reversion of Bedbug[edit]

You recently reverted my edit of the article Bedbug, where I included under "Society and Culture" a reference to Mayakovsky's satirical play "The Bedbug". Why did you revert it? Nuttyskin (talk) 15:04, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Reverted my edit[edit]

Why did you revert my edit at Wikipedia talk:Edit warring? I thought I was talking about that policy first. First, I didn't get involved on Wikipedia. Secondly, I revert vandalism on articles but don't revert more than three times in the same page. --Allen (talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 05:20, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Removed due to harassment[edit]

I removed the section because it is a clear case of harassment. I am being harassed by the folks who want that article deleted (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/FOX_animated_universe)simply because I rally'd for it to be included! Mikepellerin (talk) 03:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

You canvassed. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 04:15, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

I rally'd and asked my friends to help. I don't understand why editors who oppose this article are bent on harassment. To single me out is abusive and unbecoming of a Wikipedia Editor. Mikepellerin (talk) 06:40, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Justin Knapp (WMF)[edit]

Hey, thanks, but next time please don't go edit warring with someone like that; just let an admin know. Thanks again, Drmies (talk) 03:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)