User talk:Evilphoenix

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Nomination of List of Legends of the Hidden Temple episodes for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Legends of the Hidden Temple episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Legends of the Hidden Temple episodes (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. RJaguar3 | u | t 22:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 19:30, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Deletion review for Zeta Delta Xi[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Zeta Delta Xi. Relevant discussions Wikipedia:Help desk#Zeta Delta Xi, Wikipedia:Help desk#Restoration of Article Zeta Delta Xi, User talk:Dru of Id#Restoration of Article Zeta Delta Xi, User talk:SarekOfVulcan#Restoration of Article Zeta Delta Xi. The article's third edit proposed it for speedy deletion [1], which you declined in the 5th edit [2]. I do not know if you would consider yourself involved or neutral, but for a 160 (or 25) year old university fraternity with a place in equality history, although sources online are all tied to the organization, I am informing you of the discussion. Dru of Id (talk) 06:24, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Harry Potter[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:WikiProject Harry Potter has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)TCM 19:34, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy[edit]

You apparently were not notified about this speedy - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AEvilphoenix%2Fpotw&diff=567456927&oldid=45578088  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Information icon Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Information icon Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 13:54, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Substitution at Template:Please sign[edit]

I'm not sure if you care or not, but, being the creator of the template, I thought I should inform you.

I requested that it not be substituted, because of the markup that would create. My rationale is that if we need to remind people to sign their posts (very beginner-level material) anyone who would be at a given talk page would see a bunch of HTML after the template is substituted. I find it a "cleaner" solution to have people use the template without substituting it.

So (directly contrary to what you said) placed {{Substitution|not}} on the page.

P.S. The fact that they took away your mop is totally whack. Meteor sandwich yum (talk) 06:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC)