User talk:Faizhaider

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Acap.svgrchives ArchiveSep`06 - Aug`07 presentCrystal Clear app messenger.png
ArchiveSep`07 - Dec`07 ArchiveJan`08 - Apr`08 ArchiveMay`08 - Aug`08
ArchiveSep`08 - Dec`08 ArchiveJan`09 - Apr`09 ArchiveMay`09 - Aug`09
ArchiveSep`09 - Dec`09 ArchiveJan`10 - Apr`10 ArchiveMay`10 - Aug`10
ArchiveSep`10 - Dec`10 ArchiveJan`11 - Apr`11 ArchiveMay`11 - Aug`11
ArchiveSep`11 - Dec`11 ArchiveJan`12 - Apr`12 ArchiveMay`12 - Aug`12
ArchiveSep`12 - Dec`12 ArchiveJan`13 - Apr`13 ArchiveMay`13 - Aug`13
ArchiveSep`13 - Dec`13 ArchiveJan`14 - Apr`14 ArchiveMay`14 - Aug`14
Welcome!

Hello, Faizhaider, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 

Welcome!
Flag of India.svg

Hi, and welcome to the India WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India.

A few features that you might find helpful:

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

  • Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every India article in Wikipedia.
  • Can you code? The automation department uses automated and semi-automated methods to perform batch tasks that would be tedious to do manually.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! GizzaDiscuss © 11:10, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Links for Wikipedians interested in India content
Flag of India.svg

Welcome kit

Register

Network

Contribute content


WikiProject Lucknow invitation[edit]

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Ayatollahs may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * ''Ayatollah'' [[Syed]] [[Yusuf Kashmiri]] (1908–1982))<ref name=SAISA>{{cite web|title=SHIAS OF KASHMIR: Past Tense, Present Imperfect|url=http://

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:06, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hamid Hussain Musavi may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • on 16th February 1887, entitled him to take rank in ''Darbar'' immediately after titular ''Nawabs'']].<ref name=GBI>{{cite book|last1=Lethbridge|first1=Roper|title=The golden book of India : a

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:16, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Apologize for editing Hindi.[edit]

I am sorry, so I am apologizing you, I committed a great mistake for editing.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.92.69.122 (talk) 10:25, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

@219.92.69.122: No issues.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 11:23, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Salam alaykom[edit]

Dear Sayed Mohammad, I'm going to work in Shi'a Islam task force and revive it. I saw your name among the former active members. You can certainly help in this field. I'm preparing a new to-do list. Look forward to see you. Mhhossein (talk) 07:48, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mahmudabad, India
added links pointing to Metropole Hotel and Muslim League
Tabarra agitation
added links pointing to Jaunpur and Muslim League

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Edits of Muhammad's daughters[edit]

Hello "Sayyid". Please do not get into the habit of slyly adding baseless info under the guise of respectable sunni sources to support your sectarian agenda. No sunni disputes that Muhammad had more legitimate daughters than Fatima. Even your "honoured" cleric majlusi supports this view. The shia view has simply shamelessly evolved over time (like much of their religion) to pursue an agenda that raises the purity and uniqueness of Fatima to new heights, in order to directly raise the glory of their 12 imams that descend from her. This is done even if it involves insulting the Prophet by denying him his own children. This is the modern shia opinion, but it isn't grounded in evidence. I advice you that for the benefit of wikipedia and your own soul (and your alleged descent from the Prophet) that you cease such sly tactics and hopefully we wont be seeing such acts again. Thankyou and please feel free to respond if you seek to clarify anything.58.106.226.134 (talk) 01:08, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

@58.106.226.134: Firstly I fial to understand exactly what edits are you refering to. Secondly (judging from your edits) if you are refering to the para refering book Khulefa and Mulook, then that was not added by me in first place and that para nowhere denies about them being daughter of H.P.(s.a.w.a.) the para questions authenticity of them being married to son(s) of Abu Lahab. Regarding your sentence "The shia view ....", I can say that Sunnis to elivate status of usurper & corrupt Usman try to ascribe Hala's (or some one else's) daughters to H.P.(s.a.w.a.) and I think that is great insult to H.P.(s.a.w.a.). And no one can increase any body's status becuase as in glorious Quran Allah syas wa to izzo mantasha, wa to zillo mantasha. You can find numerous Hadith in Siyah Sittah about highest status of Hz. Fatima Zahra (s.a.) but you can't find any for any of other ascribed daughters, that itself demonstrates special status of Hz. Fatima Zahra (s.a.) which no body else enjoyed (no wife, no daughter, no other women in humankind) after all She(s.a.) is Sayidatul Nisa al alameen wal jannah (Head of women of worlds and paradise) as agreed by all Shia, Sunni, etc.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 17:24, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Of course you would say that about Uthman & Sunnis having an agenda. But in reality Shia have an infinitely greater reason to have an agenda than Sunnis. Sunnis love the Ahlul-Bayt and the Sahaba. So Sunnis have no agenda against Ali or Fatima etc. Also, apart from the honour of marrying the Prophet's daughters, Sunnis do not then claim that Uthman should have been the 1st Caliph. Shia on the other hand "love" the Ahlul-Bayt but hate the Sahaba even more than those who don't even claim to be Muslims. So the agenda is fully in your court. Besides, the Prophet married a young Aisha who was daughter of your other hated Sahaba AbuBakr, and Hafsa daughter of Umar - the most despised Sahaba for the Shia. So the Prophets familial links with his closest Sahaba is nothing to be surprised about, especially someone as close to the Prophet as Uthman. And thankyou for proving my point that Sunnis have no agenda by quoting Sunnis sources that honour & elevate Fatima.58.106.226.134 (talk) 07:24, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Love Jihad[edit]

I've got some sympathy for the removal of the sources, but probably for a different reason. They are 5 years old and are being used as if they were current. I'm also guessing that a changed political climate has led to politicians make this accusation more. Dougweller (talk) 20:52, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

@Dougweller: I agree, that the sources are old but outright removal of info & source IMHO is not correct. We may rephrase it bit, to reflect that the conclusion of investigation agencies in cases related to South India were such & such in such & such period/duration/year/etc. Also, the new wave of conspiracy theory is more concentrated in cases in North India but official machinery is outrightly rejecting it. But recent edits are surely POV push, that remove official investigation result and add new chunk of info (based on synthesis of news articles).--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 21:11, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barabanki district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Olympic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

I presume you've seen[edit]

Draft:Children of Muhammad - isn't this covered already? Dougweller (talk) 09:43, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

@Dougweller: Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I haven't seen it. Let me see then I may be able to have an opinion about it.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 10:06, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
@Dougweller: The text present in Draft:Children of Muhammad, although bit rephrased is covered in Muhammad#Household and in detail in Genealogy of Khadijah's daughters. But we don't have article named Children of Muhammad. As of now the draft lacks any citations. I'm not sure what to do. BTW, do you know any other article where it is already covered? --Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 10:50, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
If it's created it should be redirected to the household section, maybe the editor should be told that now. I don't off-hand know any related articles. Dougweller (talk) 13:27, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
@Dougweller: Agree.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 17:34, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

On the Prophets daughters[edit]

Nice try. You try to delegitimise my edits by claiming that i have taken the reference from Sunni hate sites. I would expect nothing less when it concerns edits that don't abide by your agenda. Your action is illegitimate on a number of levels. 1) You have not proven that i took this from Sunni hate sites; you have only speculated. 2) Even if i did take this source from these sites, that in itself doesn't delegitimise my edit because importantly i have taken the reference provided within these sites and not the info within this site. If i had taken the content & info in these sites then you would have an obviously legitimate argument. 3) Ibn Kathir is a legitimate scholar to cite for ones wiki contribution. All i have done is add the info in the book with the cite for the info - nothing more or less. 4) The book i have cited is also notable enough to have its own wiki page article. 5) Please don't accuse me of using hate sites when i have seen some of the references you have used in your edits and some of the ridiculous edits and articles you have created (that belong nowhere except being deleted from Wiki). i strongly suspect that some come from Shia forum hate sites. But, currently, that doesn't really bother me. So, until you can prove the edits you seek to remove are actually the quotes of these contributors of hate sites you have no right to remove them.58.106.237.48 (talk) 01:02, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

@58.106.237.48: The point is, you have no access to the source(s), (as admitted by you in above comment), then the source is relying on non-RS i.e. hate sites (& that too has been admitted by you), in that case the references and matter based on them are not fit to be included on WP and hence, will be removed.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 03:48, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
If you actually read my comment then you will clearly see i admitted to no such thing. Read: You try to delegitimise my edits by claiming that i have taken the reference from Sunni hate sites. So you have lied against me. My edit is very simple, but allow me to break it down for you to understand & comprehend: 1) I state in the relevant articles when the Prophets daughter died (i.e. nothing controversial or worthy of being accused of being from hate sites). 2) I give the notable cite for the edit (again, nothing controversial or worthy of being accused of being from hate sites). So you have no right to remove what a Sunni scholar has stated about the death dates of the Prophets daughters. If you have alternate dates then feel free to add them.58.106.237.48 (talk) 04:19, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
@58.106.237.48: I warn you to maintain civility of the discussion and not use any language which may leade an ANI request agianst the set of IPs being used by you. Regarding, your citation and the source of them, as you have insisted, following is clear proof that they are from non-RS sites, [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. You are taking information from above sites but not refering to them instead you are using citations used in them directly, you have simply copy-pasted the content & reference from one of the above sites without crediting them, which is aginst WP citaion policy as you haven't direct access to the Ibn Kathir's book.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 05:17, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Surely falsehood is ever bound to vanish. Now you can enjoy the indisputable reference given. Or is that website given also a hate site?58.106.237.48 (talk) 06:02, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
@58.106.237.48: Thats great that ultimately you have taken some pain and got actual book. But still you are doing synthesis based on primary source. But, because you deem it to be good enough to be quoted, will you allow me to use same book and quote from it to enhance the articles of the daughters? If I do so, please don't remove the content which I add because it may not be aligned to your POV but then it'll come from same book of Ibn Kathir which you are using to support your claim. Surely falsehood is ever bound to vanish.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 06:50, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
You do what gives you satisfaction. You accuse me of POV, yet your own POV agenda is clear: trying to legitimise Fatimah being the only daughter by preventing the realisation that mubahalla was done after the death of all the Prophet's other daughters.58.106.237.48 (talk) 07:42, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

you should be ashamed of yourself[edit]

being a muslim, you are labelling hindus things? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.154.90.177 (talk) 19:17, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

@109.154.90.177: what are you talking about?--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 20:00, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Andhra Pradesh. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for continued POV-pushing. The official web site of new Andhra Pradesh clearly states that Telugu is the official language of AP (in the singular), and doesn't even mention Urdu. Which combined with your attempt to use a book that was published 11 years before the creation of new Andhra Pradesh as a reference for the status of Urdu an unsourced edit. Please see WP:Verifiability, which clearly states that the burden of proof is on whoever adds material, that is in this case you. Thomas.W talk 08:42, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

@Thomas.W: It is not unsourced, and if you remember there was long entailing discussion on Talk:Andhra Pradesh regarding it and at last it was decided to leave the info until new sources are found that Urdu has lost its status in new AP. Actually it was you who counter to consensus removed the text and now are trying to engage me in edit-war. Don't try to make me afraid of these warning messages.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 08:47, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
It is unsourced. Read my message. The warning stands. Thomas.W talk 08:50, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
@Thomas.W: It is not unsourced, but defiinetely you can always make POV push. Your anti Urdu stand (at least in connection to AP article) is quite evident, you backed out from discussion and didn't participated in it, then some consensus was reached and you still didn't said a word against it. Then one fine day some vandal came and removed the info, I restored it and lo! you get awake from your deep sleep and revert my edit claiming that it is unsourced. Your this act has made all our discussions & efforts at talk page futile and waste of time. You revert edits under assupmtions (or infact pre-assumptions) like ones on my talk page and on Kososvo and then blame other editors. --Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 09:00, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
I have checked the discussion on the talk page, and what I see is walls of text posted by you, and repeated attempts by you to push your view. But no clear consensus either way. What you don't seem to realise is that there's no need to prove that new AP has dropped Urdu, they start from scratch. If the official new AP web site says that Telugu is the official language, and makes no mention of the status of Urdu, then that's it: Telugu is the official language, and there's no state-wide status for Urdu. So if you want to add Urdu as official or co-official language in new AP it's up to you to prove that it is, not up to others to prove that it isn't. Wikipedia's rules are very clear about that, the burden of proof is on whoever adds something, whether it's added as new material or as a revert of someone else's removal. And please stop posting talk-back messages on my talk page, I follow your talk page so I will notice if you reply. Thomas.W talk 09:14, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
@Thomas.W: they start from scratch, is it as per your original research? Because, AP is not new state, Telangana is, AP is old state out of which new state has been formed; you say, "I have checked the discussion on the talk page, and what I see is walls of text posted by you", you may have checked it but not read it, as I have clearly mentioned the point there; and I have posted walls of text becuase I had point & its proof and other editors agreed with it (when they were called for intervention). I know, you not only follow my talk page but have been trying to follow my edits too so that you may get an excuse to act against me but why get offended by talk backs. You were quick to revert my edit(s) but failed to act on actual vandalism happening on AP article that too shows you are tracking my each edit, so, be happy with following me but I don't care. Thanks.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 09:28, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Please stop it, claiming that I follow you around is just silly. You're not that important. Thomas.W talk 09:32, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
@Thomas.W: I didn't claimed that, you mentioned it, and your acts show that you are not intrested in reverting vandalism on AP article but too quick to revert my edit (which was to revert vandalism). And you have not read the discussion fully, your actions and talk clearly reflect that. I'll suggest to move the discussion to article's talk page.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 09:38, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
I don't follow every edit on Andhra Pradesh in real time, I just take a look at what has happened every now and then, both on AP and on close to 7,000 other pages (that's what the watchlist is for). And in your case I happened to take a look shortly after you had made the edit. Your edit was not reverting vandalism, BTW, it was yet another attempt to get your view into the article. So you should be a bit more careful with your choice of words. Thomas.W talk 09:53, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
@Thomas.W: Okay, thanks for keeping watch on 7k pages. So, if I revert & restore something, it is POV push, but if you do same act, that is NPOV. It is irrelavant if what I'm doing is my view or not unless it is NPOV, there was agreement to maintian status-quo regarding the status of Urdu in AP and I was trying to maintain that, even other editor(s) were acting on same line which you can see for example, here & here too worked in spirit of consensus reached at talk page but you seem to disagree and act contrary to it.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 12:45, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Faithfull Fleet may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • The work deals with a number of dynasties, from the [[Kadamba Dynasty|Kadamba]]s, Gangas of [[[[Eastern Ganga Dynasty|Orissa]] and [[Western Ganga Dynasty|Karnataka]], and [[Lata]]s, to the [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:07, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Fixed.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs

Disambiguation link notification for September 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Syed Mohammad Waris Hasan Naqvi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nasirabad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Fixed.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 07:53, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 5 September[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Fixed.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 07:39, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
279 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Rashidun (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
167 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: A Battle of Siffin (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
108 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Eluru (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
2,900 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Telangana (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
1,224 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Umayyad Caliphate (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
510 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA Husayn ibn Ali (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
28 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Pranahita Chevella lift irrigation scheme (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
81,483 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: A Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cleanup
43 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Islamic theological jurisprudence (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
150 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Mirinda (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
74 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: B Abd Allah ibn Abbas (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
87 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Economy of Andhra Pradesh (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
113 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Iddah (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
83 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: Start Reddy dynasty (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
388 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: FA History of the Quran (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Unencyclopaedic
2,517 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Bhagavad Gita (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Merge
788 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Jizya (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Merge
74 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Hind bint Utbah (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
29 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Mut'ah of Hajj (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
65 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Nikah 'urfi (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
30 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Turbah (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
13 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Turpu Kapu (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Giruka (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
0 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Shitab Khan (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
29 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Education in Andhra Pradesh (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
83 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Aabra Ka Daabra (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
14 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Naila (Calipha) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
6 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Bandi Atmakur (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
77 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub State Assembly elections in India (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
18 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Devadula lift irrigation scheme (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:38, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

St. Peter Inter College, Nanpara[edit]

It is the best college in district Bahraich. Its Syllabus strictly based on ICSE & ISC. It has many facilities. like bus rickshaw etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashfaqnnp2 (talkcontribs) 14:32, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Reverted[edit]

This edit seems highly improbable. I've changed it to what you mean. Best be careful in the future about things like this. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:10, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

College Project[edit]

Hello Faizhaider,

We are a group of Cornell student helping to improve wikipedia through a course assignment. As you might see already, we are trying to bring more content to the page 'Economy of Asia'. We are trying to add in regional policy and global economic environment. We added some links already, and we are excited to hear some advice/ feedbacks from you. Please let us know your comments. Thank you! Yz567 (talk) 01:34, 18 September 2014 (UTC)Course Page: Online Communities

Please follow the wikipedia rules or else you will be reported[edit]

Hello Mr. Faiz Haider, I have noticed you to keep removing the changes made by other users on some articles i.e. "Hadith of Position". You are not letting the Sunni opinion to be added. Please don't be so intolerant to Sunni views. If you continue violating the rules I have no choice but report you. Thanks, --Editor1390 (talk)

@Editor1390: Thanks for you suggestion and headsup. But if you see my recent edits you'll find that I have removed all matter based on Original Research, non-reliable & non-verifiable sources; and that included Shia View section too. I'll suggest to you that if you don't want your edits to be reverted you add relevant reliable & verifiable citations with the matter; that'll help us all.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 12:12, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
@Faizhaider: I don't know about Shia view section. I am talking the about the very first section where you keep removing my changes. You don't understand what I am trying to tell you? The article is biased and one side so I made changes to make it more objective but you keep removing my changes. Don't be a sectarian. --Editor1390 (talk) 12:21, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
@Editor1390: You fail to understand, you need to add relevant reliable & verifiable citations with the matter, as an editor adding the content Burden of proof lies on you.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 12:33, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
@Faizhaider: I did add citations. It was your one sided biased version that didn't have a single citation (I am talking about the first section). The first section where you don't allow others to contribute did not have a single citation.--Editor1390 (talk) 14:29, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
@Editor1390: Thanks for your effort. And the version was not mine it was just existing one, normally ledes don't have citations because lede is meant to be summary of the article, but as you were adding superflous text to existing version I was inistint it to be supported by citations. Meanwhile, I have further modified the article by Expanding it, Adding/improving reference(s), Removing unsourced content and bit Clean up.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 16:26, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
@Faizhaider: Thank you for understanding. Also, could you remove the section "Relevant Hadiths" with sub headings: "Hadith of Pond" and "Hadith of twelve successors" because they have got nothing to do with the topic, they are irrelevant and off-topic. Thank you --Editor1390 (talk) 16:50, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Sayyid[edit]

Stop editing the sayyid page... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gzsk101 (talkcontribs) 18:47, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

I'm just adding bukhari sayyids as descendants of imam ali Al hadi, there is nothing to argue about I'm just adding content. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gzsk101 (talkcontribs) 19:11, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

I can give you references if you want. What do you need and why did you report me -_- not cool — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gzsk101 (talkcontribs) 19:14, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

@Gzsk101: I'll suggest to you that if you don't want your edits to be reverted you add relevant reliable & verifiable citations with the matter; that'll help us all.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 19:29, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Oh okay well all bukhari sayyids are descended from surkh posh bukhari a Sufi saint from Bukhara, they now reside in different parts of the world but mainly within Pakistan. They are similar to naqvi sayyids although they don't keep the surname naqvi but rather bukhari as an indication of descent from the prophet. They claim lineage through Ali Al-Hadi the tenth Shia imam, here is some information on surkh posh bukhari, who you can search on Wikipedia or http://peerbaba76.blogspot.co.uk/p/hazrat-syed-jalaluddin-surkh-posh.html. It is common knowledge that people with the surname bukhari are usually bukhari sayyids. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gzsk101 (talkcontribs) 19:38, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

@Gzsk101: The blogspot link you are providing is not an WP:RS. Also, Bukhari (بخاري), which is a common surname in Central and Western Asia, means "from Bukhara", e.g. Muhammad al-Bukhari (810–870), editor of Sahih al-Bukhari, the book of Hadith, was not a Sayyid but was from Bukhara.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 19:46, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes that is true simply having the surname bukhari doesn't 100% mean that one is a bukhari sayyid, however all bukhari sayyids keep bukhari as their surname. They are descendants of the prophet through Ali Al hadi, sorry what do you mean by its not an [WP:RS]. Bukhari sayyids are sometimes intertwined with naqvi sayyids however they keep a different surname. Within Shia communities(where sayyids wear black turbans) people with the surname bukhari are readily recognised as descendants of the prophet. You can just add a note saying that having the surname bukhari doesn't 100% mean that they are a sayyid although they're are many sayyids who keep that surname. I'm going to stop editing the sayyid page until we resolve this, and then you can change it yourself as editor. Thanks. So what do you mean by WP:RS, and why do you keep reporting me for vandalism?!! Also if you look under the subtitle of sayyids in Pakistan, they sayyids from Bukhara are the bukhari sayyids.

You are disrupting[edit]

You keep changing and distorting Sunni opinions while you are a Shia (intolerant one) and under "Sunni View" in the page Hadith of Position, you add quotes out of context. Like you added Albanis narration when it is not his opinion but rather but just a narration. It shows your desperation that you can't tolerate a Sunni opinion.--Editor1390 (talk) 21:41, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

@Editor1390: I fail to understand why do you think I'm distorting Sunni opinions when I'm just trying to balance out the section because you are just adding opinions of single flavour while others too exist. Also, you fail to understand that few changes which you are doing are either fully uncited or synthesis or extrapolation of citations which is not allowed as per WP policies and are hence being reverted. Also, I'll suggest to focus on content rather than individual comments and keep the discussion civil.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 06:43, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
@Faizhaider: Acting very civil? I am adding what the Sunni consensus is under the Sunni view section. You are putting the narration (like Al-alBani's)under the Sunni View section while the same narration is also present in other sections. You are repeating the content due to your desperation.--Editor1390 (talk) 14:00, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
@Editor1390: You only asked me, "could you remove the section "Relevant Hadiths"", now, before the section is removed some of its content is being re-adjusted, so for time being duplicacy may occur but in your desperate attempt to suppress counter sunni views than to yours you have resorted to accusation and allegations and modifing the article content as per your whims and fancies in contrary to sources provided.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 15:57, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
@Faizhaider:

"attempt to suppress Counter Sunni views"? I am not attempting to surpress any counter sunni view, I have not touched the "Shia View Section" a single time so you are lying big time. It is you who is distorting the Sunni view section. You are quoting a narration under a "Sunni View" section while there are already loads of narrations available in other sections. Due to your sectarianism and lack of knowledge you write "as per Al-albani" while Al-Albani was just a grader of Hadith not collector. It shows your lack of knowledge and desperation.

As for my comment where I asked you to remove the "Relevent Hadiths" well you haven't removed them. You should be ashamed of yourself for being a liar and deceptive.

Also, you removed my reference (a website) claiming it was talking about a different Hadith. You are either lying or saying this due to your ignorance of the science of Hadith. The link talks about the authenticity of that additional sentence. You can not silence the truth no matter what you do. If you do this again I will contact other senior editors about your disruptive behavior,

--Editor1390 (talk) 17:36, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Economy of Asia[edit]

Hello Faizhaider,

we are describing the new free trade zone in Shanghai and it's new regulations, and we incorporated this in the page since we consider it as a big change in regional policy. We don't know why you think this is a ad, would you mind providing more insights? ThanksYz567 (talk) 02:02, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

@Yz567: Sorry for late reply. BTW can you elaborate what exactly you are referring to.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 17:59, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014 Wikification Drive[edit]

This message was delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from the recipients page. -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes, yes it is.[edit]

Genuine free t-shirt entitlement to our monthly disambiguation contest winners. Cheers! bd2412 T 17:52, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

@BD2412:Oh great! I was not aware of the entitlement, I taught e-mail was hoax/spam. Thanks.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 18:02, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
It's a new thing - we got hooked up with it at Wikimania. bd2412 T 18:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014[edit]

Super Disambiguator's Barnstar.png The Super Disambiguator's Barnstar
The Super Disambiguator's Barnstar is awarded to the winners of the Disambiguation Pages With Links monthly challenge, who have gone above and beyond to remove ambiguous links.
This award is presented to Faizhaider, for successfully fixing 2420 links in the challenge of September, 2014. Rcsprinter123 (gossip) @ 08:48, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Portuguese Democratic Labour Party (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Communist Electoral Front (Marxist–Leninist) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub People's Socialist Front (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Worker–Peasant Alliance (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Popular Unity Party (Portugal) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
10 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Left Front Tire (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
59 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Left Front (India) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
4 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Doe-Anderson Inc. (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 2.0 Cleanup
81 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Brightcove (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
8 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Hope for Portugal Movement (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
17 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start 1997 San Francisco Giants season (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start 2012 Yemeni President Cup (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
34 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Tarija (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
16 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Fourth International (ICR) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
127 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA International Marxist Tendency (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Sara Cohen (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Communist Party of Portugal (Marxist–Leninist) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
46 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start African-American representation in Hollywood (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
60 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Fourth International (post-reunification) (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Dimitré Dinev (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Cristy Spencer (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Left Front (Czechoslovakia) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Aruthraa Vidyalaya (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Andrew Marchand (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Left Revolutionary Front (Portugal) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Movement for the Sick (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Internationalist Communist League (Portugal) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub New Order (Portugal) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Democratic Leftwing Republican Party (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Revolutionary Party of the Workers of Bolivia (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:03, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Majid Majidi's film 'Muhammad'[edit]

Hi... Please can you create and page and expand it. This film's Wikipedia is essential. I feel so. Here are the sources.

Regarding "Lists of Maraji" article[edit]

Hi Mr. Faizhaider

I put two suggestions in the Talk:Lists of Maraji. Please read them and give your idea about them.

Koorosh1234 (talk|contribs) 17:05, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Happy Birthday Faizhaider[edit]

Anniv.svg Hey, Faizhaider. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
Vatsan34 (talk) 18:55, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Face-smile.svg

Condolences for the Martyrdom of Imam Husayn -pbuh&hf-[edit]

Salam Alaykum Syed,

Thank you for you message and advice, and please accept my condolences for the martyrdom of your grandfather Imam Husayn ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib -pbut&tf-. May Allah accept your good deeds and actions as well as ours, and may he count us between the real servants of the Imam of our Era, the proof of Allah Almighty on earth, Imam Mahdi -mAhha-, and may Allah Almighty grant us the vengeance at the hands of his representative and the representative of the holy Family of the Messenger Muhammad -pbuh&hf-. Icewizard (talk) 07:03, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Verny Capital[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Verny Capital has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has been tagged for 10 months with few fixes; company has unclear notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 17:42, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
67 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start GAZ Vodnik (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
2,724 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Mourning of Muharram (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Mohammad Mehdi Khalesi (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
37 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Haft-Seen (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
2,200 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Buenos Aires (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
467 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Dawoodi Bohra (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
404 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: Start Shalwar kameez (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
291 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Al-Azhar University (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
149 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: FA BTR-50 (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cleanup
2,922 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Caliphate (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Expand
3,448 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Arabic language (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Expand
115 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: A Linguistic history of the Indian subcontinent (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Expand
2,349 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Hindi (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
7,426 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Iran (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Unencyclopaedic
57 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start History of Hindustani (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
308 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA Iranian rial (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Merge
1,327 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Caliph (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
41 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Persian and Urdu (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
41 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Tasu'a (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
698 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Rashidun Caliphate (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
450 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: Start Transliteration (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Saleh Taei (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Mohammad Taher Khaqani (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Mohammad Hadi Ghazanfari Khansari (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Qasem Taei (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
11 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Basheer Bagh Palace (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Ali Hassani Baghdadi (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub The Home Computer Course (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Shamsodin Vaezi (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
39 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Sheer khurma (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:03, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Hasan ibn Ali[edit]

You made some valuable changes to a paragraph in the article on Hasan ibn Ali. In the middle of your changes, there was a change by an IP editor. I have reverted the edit by the IP editor - Abu Talib al-Makki cannot have been a Salafi, since he lived 900 years before the Salafi movement started.

Do you think it would be better if the word "refuted" (disproved) were toned down? Wouldn't "disputed" be more neutral? The article only cites one source for the "refutation" - the religious website: www.al-islam.org. Do you know of objective histories that deal with this issue?-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:21, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

@Toddy1:I have added three more references.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 19:15, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

About Tatbir[edit]

Twelvers Usuli follow those Marjas who are alive. Sistani, Ali Khamnei is followed by majority of Shias, so their fatwa is more important. and if you are in favor of tatbir then you can create one more section as "Akhbari view on tatbir". 39.48.125.175 (talk) 05:52, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Dead scholars doesn't means that their opinions & verdicts carry no weight or place. For you information 99% of Hawza study material consists of works of these dead scholars. Please refrain from disruptive editing and POV-pushing.
Also, any article is not just about current status & affairs, on this specific article even for arguments sake if we assume your point that only living Maraji are important then too comments/edicts/fatwas of dead scholars give perspective that current stand (whatever it is) has been evolving in recent times.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 07:58, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello Seyyed[edit]

As a seyyed you are very respectful to me. I'm very pleased to cooperate with editors like you. Mhhossein (talk) 18:13, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wajid Ali Shah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fort William. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Siege of Skardu (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
213 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Islam in Turkey (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
410 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Fatimah (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
346 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA Twelver (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
331 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Muawiyah I (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
33 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Abdullah ibn Masud (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
136 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
1,019 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: A Ali Khamenei (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cleanup
144 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Islam and children (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cleanup
70 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Sectarianism in Pakistan (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 2.0 Expand
7 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Kannauji language (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
21 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Bundeli language (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
102 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Nahj al-Balagha (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
92 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Iraqi Turkmens (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Unencyclopaedic
21 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Old Azeri language (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 2.0 Unencyclopaedic
949 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Arabesque (Islamic art) (talk) 2.0 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
1,237 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Islamic calendar (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Merge
387 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Haram (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
187 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Sebastian Koch (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
309 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Hizb ut-Tahrir (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 2.0 Wikify
311 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Greater Khorasan (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Mohammad Ali Shirazi (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Ahmad Khonsari (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Abu Sa'id Al-Janadi (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
18 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Naeem Baig (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
12 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Lari language (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Allaedin Ghoraifi (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
73 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Samsung Galaxy A5 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Morteza Hosseini Fayaz (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Mohammad Shahroudi (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:24, 9 December 2014 (UTC)