User talk:Favre1fan93

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

A page you started (Music of the Marvel Cinematic Universe) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Music of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Favre1fan93!

Wikipedia editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you!

To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Forever Evil[edit]


I noticed you reversed my changes.

Please be aware that Justice League 30, Justice League of America #14 and Suicide Squad #30 all have the Forever Evil banner on them. Regardless of whether they were solicted as part or not they are bannered now and should be included.

Because if we want to split hairs a lot of the Constantine's in the Blight storyline didn't have this banner but are included as internally they say they are part of the storyline.


Guardians of the Galaxy opinion[edit]

Okay, I don't want this to hype you up too much because I'm afraid that if you don't like it it'll be my fault. However, this is my 100% honest opinion of Guardians of the Galaxy:

It is my favourite film based on Marvel characters. X-Men, Spider-Man, Thor, Avengers, Iron Man, Captain America, Hulk, everyone. Without a doubt in my mind, I can say it's my favourite of all of them. Now, I'm also a massive fan of James Gunn and his style, so maybe I liked it more than most, but I know a good amount of people who agree with me (including those that saw the film with me).

So I apologize if this harms your enjoyment in any way, but I felt you should know what I thought. You said you're seeing it tonight, right? Sock (pka Corvoe) (be heard)(my stuff) 18:42, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

@Sock: Got back an hour or so ago from seeing it: loved it!! It is really up there for my favorite Marvel film. I was a little disappointed by the post credit scene. BUT, I absolutely loved twig Groot at the end! That was great! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:41, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Futures End[edit]

Hey, I'll leave you to doing the citations. I'm just separating all of the little plots right now and making them a bit more focused because in this case of Futures End where all the plots happen at different times, keeping them restrained in the order they happen would be a little bit less than beneficial. --Schmeater (talk) 20:09, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Okay. Even if you could just get <ref>''Futures End'' #(issue here)</ref> after the info each time, that will help me in the long run. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:43, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Arkham Knight[edit]

What do you think about my theory? Just give it a chance. URDNEXT (talk) 14:59, 3 August 2014 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Favre1fan93. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:TV#Series Finale revisited.
Message added 16:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hey Favre, if you get a second, I would appreciate your input at this discussion. Obviously it's not required though, so no pressure. :) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC)


Hey Favre! I've been working on a new article, and I'm struggling with archiving web pages from Variety. It consistently goes to the interstitial and then refreshes at the end of the seven(?) second buffer time. How do you work around this? Sock (pka Corvoe) (be heard)(my stuff) 23:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

@Sock: I have to check, but I think the archives do that, unfortunately. I just put them in and hope for the best. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:00, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Someone must have figured out a workaround, because I re-archived a Variety page sourced on GOTG and I got the interstitial, but it works fine when clicked from the Wikipedia page. Sock (pka Corvoe) (be heard)(my stuff) 18:16, 5 August 2014 (UTC)


Hey, do you have any time in the future to help take Batman: Under the Red Hood to GA? I would be easy if there were a lot of references. Tanks for eevrything in advance! URDNEXT (talk) 02:38, 8 August 2014 (UTC)


I don't know if your saw or not, but Webcitation is back up and running! - adamstom97 (talk) 10:03, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Thank god. Sock (tock talk) 11:20, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Yes I did thanks! After looking at all new page edits, I'm going to go back to my edits over the past few days and archive up! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:16, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Guardians of the Galaxy: ready to nominate?[edit]

@TriiipleThreat, Richiekim: Hey guys! I read over the article just now, and I can honestly say that I think we're ready to nominate it. If you disagree, let's try to figure out what we need to do to improve it so we can have it ready to go in no time! It'd be awesome to get Cap 2 and GOTG promoted within a few weeks of each other. Sock (tock talk) 14:47, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Its too soon. There is still a lot to had from the box office and post production. Also its at the height of the article traffic and stability is still a major concern. When we get closer to home release, I think we should be good.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:16, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Valid points all around. I suppose I'm just anxious. Sock (tock talk) 17:01, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Agree on too soon as well. While I believe this will be a much quicker article to nominate, as Triiiple said, we still have stability and other content to add/worry about. I'm anxious too, because we spent so much time on it, but we have to wait a bit more. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:15, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────I don't know if this would be of any use to you in the MCU stuff but The Hollywood Reporter article about James Gunn's birthday gift highlights the three items that have appeared as Infinity Stones in the films. Just if you needed a single source for them. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 11:52, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

A Misunderstanding[edit]

I am not a sockpuppet. I was merely trying to contribute to this website and my attempts to do so have been misunderstood. If there is anyway to clear my name of these accussations, I would like to use them. This is my first time using Wikipedia and I have no reason to abuse the rights that I am given on this site. I would also like to explain that I find it hard to cite my sources on this site to back up any of my contributions and would like some assistance. Thank you for your timeEditor35109 (talk) 18:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Editor35109.

Date formatting thing[edit]

From the documentation: "In general, the date format used for publication dates within references should match that used within the article body. However, it is common practice for archive and access dates to use the alternative ymd format. This usage is valid and is specifically mentioned at MOSDATE. In those cases, the archive and access date formats should not be altered when fixing dates." (emphasis mine) --erachima talk 07:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

A) common by who? It does not say, and I have never seen that enforced in my time here. B) WP:MOSDATE says: Access and archive dates in references should all use the same format: the format used for publication dates, yyyy-mm-dd, or the format required for the citation style adopted in the article (my emphasis). The page is adopting the MDY format, so refs should be included. I'm not going to edit war over this; they are dates. But some consistency would be nice. That line you quoted should also be brought to attention at the template talk, because it is contradicted in the MOS, which I would look to first rather than the template documentation. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:28, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
It accurately reflects WP:MOSDATE. Which as you note, says: "Access and archive dates in references should all use the same format: the format used for publication dates, yyyy-mm-dd, or the format required for the citation style adopted in the article." (emphasis mine) --erachima talk 13:28, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

SHIELD Pilot[edit]

I recently made some edits to Pilot (Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.) and was wondering if, when you have time, you could have a look at the page, and maybe give some suggestions on where to go with it next? I am aiming to make individual pages for every episode, but would rather get them as good as possible as they are made, rather than having a lot of low quality articles. - adamstom97 (talk) 11:00, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Yeah. I'll probably have some time next week to give it a proper look over. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:30, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

I have also made some edits to 0-8-4, but there is still work needed there, so if you have the time it would be great if you could have a look over it at some point. - adamstom97 (talk) 08:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Shoot. I forgot about the Pilot. Yeah. I'll take a look at both today. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:10, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
@Adamstom.97: I just looked over the pilot. Looks really good. I added one citation needed tag regarding Smulders from January 2013 (I quickly looked on other SHILED pages and could not seem to find the source you used.) Also, I would expand/change the reception section to include reviews from EW, Variety, IGN, AV Club and/or Steranko's thoughts. Otherwise, looks really good at the moment. Going to get to 084 now. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:07, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
For 084, a few citations needed tags, expand the plot some, and then include reviews from the parties mentioned above as well. Otherwise, good job. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:40, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for this Favre, its always good to have some other opinions. I am just fixing up those citations now, and then will have a look at the reception stuff. Thanks again for the help. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:43, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Also, I don't know if we can do any more over at the Afd page, but if you could that would be great - I'd rather all this work not be deleted for no good reason. - adamstom97 (talk) 05:20, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Guardians of the Galaxy[edit]

Here's a good source about the visual effects in GotG for use in the post-production section. I know there's a lot there, in the past I just tried tried summarize the role of the companies and a couple of key fx sequences. I do it myself but I don't have the time.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 09:54, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! I've been waiting for this! I'll give it a read, and see what I can add. Also, short on time, but it will get done! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:04, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Batman, nananana[edit]

Hey man! I was wondering if you can copy edit Batman: Under the Red Hood's plot section? I don't think I can pull it off myself! Thanks for everything in advance! URDNEXT (talk) 12:47, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

By the way, do you know if in film articles, I should have a whole section for theme? URDNEXT (talk) 18:35, 16 August 2014 (UTC)


Please familiarize yourself with the guidelines at WP:OWN. Your opinions do not take precedence over other editors or the conventions of the English language. It's not useful to label edits you disagree with "disruptive". Also, check out Wikipedia:Consensus and WP:BRD if you have a specific complaint. Woodshed (talk) 21:05, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I see this comment is over a disagreement for the wording at Gotham (TV series). I'm gonna have to say that Favre is in the right here. An upcoming show does not technically star anyone yet, as it hasn't been released. I don't see the problem with adding upcoming. Also, all of your cites to Wikipedia pages were invalid, as Favre definitely isn't showing article ownership, there is no consensus on the wording of the page (though Favre has support from WP:SILENCE, which is referenced in WP:CONSENSUS), and per WP:BRD you should have been the one to start a discussion, not him. You seem to be quoting articles you've not read yourself. Sock (tock talk) 21:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
I am very much aware of WP:OWN, and I am not in any fault regarding it. However, you were not only reverted by me, you were done so by another editor as well. So I suggest you read up on WP:BRD and familiarize yourself with the process to start a discussion, lest you receive more warnings for your editing. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

agents of shield, awards[edit]

please!!! stop change that, if doesnt make any difference why are you change? i dont want fight — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 21:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Please read WP:OSE. Prose, for the time being, is an acceptable representation of this information over a table. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Redirect to Draft[edit]

Is it possible to redirect a mainspace topic to a Draft article until filming starts? According to my thoughts, rather than redirecting the topics in mainspace somewhere it should be possible to redirect them into Drafts, as it'll help editors to find a place to add data for upcoming events/films. What do you say? --Captain Assassin! «TCG» 18:54, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) In short no. Drafts are not articles and should not be treated as such. Redirecting a page to the draftspace would just be circumventing guidelines like WP:NFF. We can however inform editors of a draft's existence through talk page messages and Help:Hidden text.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:14, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Everything that Triiiple said is correct. A Draft is not part of the mainspace, and should not be linked anywhere from the mainspace that a reader will unsuspectedly come across it (in terms of looking for factual info). While Drafts I may have a hand in are up to date, others may not be. Think of them as articles being created in user subpages, except more open to all editors. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:49, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Alright, got it, thanks to both of you. Where do I put Help:Hidden text about Draft if the redirect is not existed? Actually I'm thinking to work always in the Draft for upcoming films like you guys are doing, so the question is...while I'm working in the Draft on a topic and someone creates the same article in the mainspace before moving the Draft. Will that Draft be moved (merged) to mainspace in that condition or not? Hope you get my message correctly :). --Captain Assassin! «TCG» 18:53, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Not entirely sure on a good place to put hidden text if no redirect exists. If based on a property (comic, book, etc.), in that article's subsection should be good. As for if the page gets created unknowingly without the draft content, you can request a WP:HISTMERGE if it is necessary. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:35, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Then there's an article The Jungle Book (2015 film) created unknowingly or knowingly, because I had mentioned in the redirect that a Draft:The Jungle Book (2015 film) was in development. So what about this article which was moved by Tokyogirl79? Even the redirect which was removed to make a space for other article had edit history of more than 10 edits (wasn't an empty redirect) and I had mentioned the Draft in it. And the production of the film is also not confirmed by a reliable source, it has only one source which is just a Film database site. --Captain Assassin! «TCG» 10:29, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
I don't believe production has started, per the sources on the mainspace article. I would approach an administrator about the situation. I believe your draft work takes precedent over the newly created article (1, because you started it sooner, and 2, it appears to be more accurate than what was created). So find an area on the HISTMERGE page to request such, or approach an admin about redirecting/deleting the mainspace article, per WP:NFF. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:47, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Shouldn't we wait for the production to begin before requesting for the HISTMERGE? And there's also another article in this situation, please look at the history of Alice in Wonderland 2 which I think needs to be merged into Alice in Wonderland: Through the Looking Glass. If so, please recommend me a good Admin relating to Film articles. --Captain Assassin! «TCG» 02:03, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Should should take care of the HISTMERGE now imo. User:Mark Arsten has been helpful to me in the past. Explain your situation and he should help. Or User:HJ Mitchell. - Favre1fan93 (talk)
Thank you, I've told Mark Arsten the whole situation. Please comment on his talk page. --Captain Assassin! «TCG» 06:33, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Thor: The Dark World[edit]

I don't think it's accurate to call the reception to Thor: The Dark World "generally positive". For instance, on a quick Google search, I found that CBS, E!, Indiewire, Vulture, and the International Business Times all refer to it as receiving mixed reviews. Would you be okay with me changing the lead to reflect this information? Sock (tock talk) 18:49, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Yeah. I just didn't think it should have been removed. You should cite the statement with one of those sources. Or add the full review to the page and cite the mixed part there, so we don't have a cite in the lead. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
How would you advise I cite it and the review? Put it at the front of critical response or what? Sock (tock talk) 19:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Well we generally discourage of "summary lead sentences", but that is when readers are making the assumptions. If we have a source, I think you can do: "The film received mixed reviews from critics.[source] Aggregate stuff" - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:29, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Writers Barnstar Hires.png The Writer's Barnstar
Thanks for being a great editor! You make Wikipedia a better place! URDNEXT (talk) 21:39, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:47, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Discussion for Wolverine (character)[edit]

I am inviting you to take part in this discussion to determine if the page should be called Wolverine (character) or "Wolverine (comics)." --Rtkat3 (talk) 22:11, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Someone made a page for Jungle Book (2015)...[edit]

So then I decdied to redirect it to Jungle Book (2015 film) but as it turns out it just goes to the main page-maybe they should be combined? thanks! (I was surprise there was no page for it now) But yeah I was just thinking this! Wgolf (talk) 18:50, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Oops forgot to put the page they made-The Jungle Book (2015).

Wgolf (talk) 18:54, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Taken care of with a redirect. A page for the film should not exist until a reliable source confirms production has begun, per WP:NFF. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:02, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

May I trouble you to comment?[edit]

Hey mang, may I trouble you to please comment at Talk:List of Oggy and the Cockroaches episodes if you get a chance? Basically there's some n00b editor of questionable intention who's attempting to take ownership of the article (see article edit history and their absurd ultimatums along with their absurd comments on my talk page. They even illegitimately filed for page protection to prevent any edits that went against their POV. Danke, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:22, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Sandbox 4[edit]

I noticed you added SHIELD character content to your 4th sandbox that is very similar to the content in my own sandbox 4. I was wondering what your intentions are for this info, and how big of a priority it is for you, and maybe if I should merge my content with yours and focus my efforts concerning this subject to your version? - adamstom97 (talk) 00:37, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

I just kind of did it to see what it would look like. I don't really have any plans for it. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:51, 30 August 2014 (UTC)