User talk:Fireball24fire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Fireball24fire, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Fireball24fire! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

October 2014[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Yunshui  11:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

My reason to unblock[edit]

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fireball24fire (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

To stop disruptive editing

Decline reason:

Yes, this block has succeeded in stopping your disruptive editing. When you arrived at this private website, you AGREED to the rules. Blocks should NEVER be required, but the first block was intended to PREVENT repeat behaviour. In 99% of cases, a second block is never required. However, it was in this case, which has led now to a third and final block. We're already convinced that you've done a bad thing, so thanks for that. You clearly do not hold the required maturity to edit an encyclopedia. I will extend what we call the Standard Offer. You must not edit Wikipedia, period for a minimum of 6 months. You must not try and create a new account. You must not edit while logged out - no editing PERIOD. It's also recommended during that 6 month period that you try and do some positive work elsewhere on a Wikipedia project. No sooner than 6 months from today, you may return and request unblock. If you violate the "no editing" rule above, not only does the clock restart to 6 months, it will be extended. Perhaps by that time you will have attained a degree of maturity that will, indeed, allow you to contribute to this project the panda ₯’ 13:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Here's my reason: I'm appealing this because I've been blocked three times because I've been editing disruptively. I want to convince them that I done a bad thing. Please respond to my appeal. Fireball24fire (talk) 12:22, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fireball24fire (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

To stop editing with disruptions

Decline reason:

I'm declining your request to be unblocked, because I consider your unblock request to be unconvincing. PhilKnight (talk) 14:57, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Here's another reason: I want to say I'm sorry for blocking me for a long time and I have a favor to ask. This is my reason because I want to stop editing with disruptions.

I think we're already convinced that you 'done a bad thing'. What we aren't convinced of is that you really understand why it is a bad thing, and that you won't do it again (and again...) Peridon (talk) 14:19, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
They wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt before, but you kept uploading new copyrighted images without an explanation. That's against the rules on Wikipedia. Tezero (talk) 14:38, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
You have at least twice now, promised not to do this anymore, and yet you've done it yet again. No one believe your empty promises. This is what happens when you repeatedly (and immediately) return to the activities that get you blocked earlier. I was only going to block you for a few months, but honestly, DangerousPanda makes a pretty good case. You've proven that there's really no reason to believe you'll stop doing this in the short term.Sergecross73 msg me 14:44, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fireball24fire (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

To apologize that I've edited with disruptions

Decline reason:

I really, really, like unblocking editors who have made a bad start, been blocked, and then make it clear that they understand why they have been blocked, and will not do it again. I do, honestly. I think it is far better for an editor to come back and edit constructively than for them to be kept out, so they can't contribute. However, you have not made it clear that you understand why you have been blocked, and will not do it again. You keep making unblock requests that basically just say "what I did was bad, and I won't do it again", but you have never shown what you think was bad about your editing, and you have never said how your editing from now on will be different from what you did before. If you can do those two things, you may be unblocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:36, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Wait! I have to say that I've been blocked for the third time and you gave me an infinite block because of this and with that, I'm saying I'm sorry. I want to edit but you kept on reverting and with that, here is my reason: To stop editing after all of the things I've done!

Sorry, but you can't be trusted. You have made no attempt to fix your behavior following previous blocks. There is little reason to believe you're competent enough to edit Wikipedia. Try again in six months, as Dangerous Panda suggests. You can use that time to read up on Wikipedia policy and learn what is and isn't appropriate. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 16:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Your apology is noted and accepted. But its not a valid reason to be unblocked. There is no way an admin is going to unblock you with a request like that. If you put up a fourth unblock request after this one is denied, you will lose your talk page access, which will complicate even trying to come back in 6 months. Please stop this. Sergecross73 msg me 16:10, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

While diary entries are not really the intended use of a talk page, but I see no harm, and won't keep you from doing it. However, you are not allowed to remove active block notices, or unblock requests, while you are blocked. Please stop that. Sergecross73 msg me 20:25, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
I recommend you stop editing this talk page altogether. Continue messing with it and you will likely have talk page access removed, and your chances of being unblocked in six months will diminish if not disappear completely. Stop removing your block notice and your declined unblock requests. This is a very simple instruction. I'm sorry, but if you can't follow it, then you have absolutely no business editing Wikipedia whatsoever. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 21:25, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Talk page access removed. You were told multiple times not to remove block/unblock information, yet you still did. If you can't follow simple instructions, it appears you're not ready for Wikipedia yet. Sergecross73 msg me 23:27, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014: My diary[edit]

Dear Diary, It has been a busy month for me wasn't it? First the block, then the talk page removal, now an infinite block? That is crazy I tell you! I know that if I put one more unblock request, I'll lose everything so to avoid this, I'm making a diary! Fireball24fire (talk) 19:46, 17 October 2014 (UTC)