User talk:Flat Out

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Crystal Clear app clock.svg It is approximately 7:13 AM where this user lives. (Melbourne, Australia)

Talk Page Archives

Please comment on Talk:Kenji Miyazawa[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kenji Miyazawa. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Need advice[edit]

Sir, Apologies for the bother. I am a new editor and wanted some advice. I had edited a page on Naya Nazimabad that you reverted due to BLP violations (assuming negative reporting on the sponsors of the project). However sources quoted include the Supreme Court of Pakistan judgements and Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan orders apart from the multiple news sources. Is nothing negative allowed to be portrayed in such matters despite court judgements? I am not sure I want to take time rewriting parts. Just wanted to get advice for the future.

On a different note News about the project itself (the land development called Naya Nazimabad) was mostly negative. The Company's response to some of the news articles was also cited. Is that an issue since it is not a living person? Thank you for your time, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Insider99 (talkcontribs) 10:59, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Insider99 please read WP:BLPCRIME and WP:NPOV and let me know if you have any questions. Flat Out talk to me 02:46, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:G. Edward Griffin[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:G. Edward Griffin. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 6 May 2015 (UTC)


I am slightly confused by your reverts of my reverts in March re: ChenOne. I noticed you cited BLPCRIME, but WP:CENSOR was the live issue for me. The sources referenced clearly indicated the company and individual named were in violation of some laws of that country, and was found to be guilty as such. The edit claimed the information was 'bias' and 'disrespectful', despite the reputable sources otherwise. It was also clear that the individual had a court case pending in 2013, and was an appeal all the way to the Supreme Court of Pakistan: [1][2]. While I don't know the outcome of the case, they were indeed facts in accordance to the various sources.--Cahk (talk) 03:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Cahk and thanks for your message. I have had a second look and agree that part of that section is OK but the sentence Other indivdials sued by the SECP included brothers of the CEO of ChenOne, namely Mian Muhammed Latif and Mian Muhammed Javaid Iqbal and other relatives namely, Mian Faisal Latif, Mian Farhan Latif, Mian Zeeshan Latif, Mian Rizwan Latif and Muhammed Irfan Maqbool. The said indivudals are currently out on bail seems a clear BLP violation to me. It is just one of many edits made by an editor who has used a number of articles to launch attacks. Please let me know what you think, I'm happy for the first part of the revert to be reinstated. Cheers Flat Out talk to me 04:04, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
I don't really care whether those passages get reverted - I was simply pointing out to you the revert was counter to why I did it in the first place. The Not Censored policy should be paramount to those who wants to edit out negative information. --Cahk (talk) 06:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)


Hello Flat Out, I noticed other AC/DC biographies included, and I thought it would be appropriate to add mine. Sorry I didn't realize it would be considered advertising. Sincerely, Rokcentral (talk) 06:48, 6 May 2015 (UTC)Susan Masino

Rokcentral yes but not on talk pages. Flat Out talk to me 07:11, 6 May 2015 (UTC)