User talk:Flatterworld

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Dan Savage and cyberbullying[edit]

You raise a very good issue there, and I wanted to thank you for it. I hope that someone who he respects will point out the contradiction to him in a way that allows him to gracefully back down from this campaign. Like you, I don't agree with Senator Santorum on this issue - to the point of being repulsed by it. But as you said, cyberbullying is cyberbullying.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 21:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Worldcat Identities[edit]

Thank you for your Ann Dunham edit. The identites feature looks promising. --Javaweb (talk) 09:20, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Javaweb

June 2011[edit]

The next edit you make of this nature will get your account blocked. Don't assume bad faith. Don't insult other editors. Don't call people sleazy. Thank you. Jehochman Talk 18:24, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

  • Basic reading comprehension skills clearly not a requirement for Adminship. Many pointed out his error, but more than two years later and he still refuses to acknowledge it, preferring to continue playing God. Still no Emmy for that, either. Flatterworld (talk) 21:17, 23 September 2013 (UTC)


RETIRED
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Please, please reconsider!!!![edit]

You and I may not be sympatico on an issue or two, but this project would be grievously the worse for your departure. Please reconsider. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:34, 24 June 2011 (UTC)))

Nomination for deletion of Template:CNNtopic[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:CNNtopic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Y u no be Russavia ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) 09:20, 10 December 2011 (UTC) )

Nomination for deletion of Template:Economist topic[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:Economist topic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Y u no be Russavia ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) 22:02, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

GA Thanks[edit]

Symbol support vote.svg This user helped promote the article Rahm Emanuel to good article status.

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your editorial contributions to Rahm Emanuel, which has recently become a GA. --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:18, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Campaign finance feedback[edit]

Thanks for your feedback on the campaign finance idea! I really appreciate your input. Could you clarify what you meant by filling out the missing CongLinks parameters? Did you mean additional data sources, or adding one of the template options like OpenSecrets to pages that don't have them. Again, thanks so much for taking the time to weigh in. Will Hopkins (talk) 02:44, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:NGOLinks[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:NGOLinks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Binksternet (talk) 19:36, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:GovLinks[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:GovLinks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thargor Orlando (talk) 16:56, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:JudgeLinks[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:JudgeLinks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Binksternet (talk) 17:53, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Hillary Rodham Clinton move request[edit]

Greetings! A proposal has been made at Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton#Requested move 8 to change the title of the article, Hillary Rodham Clinton to Hillary Clinton. This notification is provided to you per Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification, because you have previously participated in a discussion on this subject. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

OneWorld.net listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect OneWorld.net. Since you had some involvement with the OneWorld.net redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talktrack) 02:39, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Joshua Segall for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joshua Segall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Segall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 22:53, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:RePEc[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:RePEc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – S. Rich (talk) 06:16, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Move review notification[edit]

Because you participated in the most recent discussion regarding the proposed move of Hillary Rodham Clinton, you are hereby notified per Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification that the administrative determination of consensus from that discussion is being challenged at Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2014 May. Please feel free to comment there. Cheers! bd2412 T 19:21, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Janet Oleszek for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janet Oleszek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Oleszek until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – S. Rich (talk) 16:51, 22 July 2014 (UTC)