|This user may have left Wikipedia. FreplySpang has not edited Wikipedia using this account since since April 22, 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking the assistance of this user on this page, you may need to approach someone else.|
Archives of this talk page: March2005, April2005, May2005, JulyAugust2005, August2005, September2005, October-December2005, January-February2006, March-April2006, May-June2006, July-August2006, September2006, October2006, November2006, Dec2006 Jan2007 Feb2007 Mar2007 Apr2007 May 2007 - June 2008
ICES (Institution of Civil Engineering Surveyors) wikipedia page
I would like to know why the page that I (Alphag) uploaded has been deleted?
And if so can someone please tell me where there is adequate training to administer wikipedia? The site is extremely un-friendly and un-helpful. The instructions are un-clear and the fact that someone can simply delete your work is not fair, especially when the text is reliable and legitimate. How can one "admin£ person be allowed to delete the text and suggest that the phrase " civil engineering surveying" is quoted from a website when it is not.
Please can someone help a genuin person who uses wikipedia in his every day life and likes it (in general) who is trying to make the most of teh service?
Kind regards Diss gruntled Alphag.
I want to know about passage
I don't know if "no meaningful content" means that the page was just poorly written or undinformative, but if, by not meaningful, you meant not important or unworthy of wikipedia, I disagree. I want the encyclopedia's take on this game, rather than having to read the publisher/producer's own information, which is the first hit on google. I believe the relevant wikipedia article should always be in the top three hits from any search engine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 12:40, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Notice of discussion
As you were involved i this issue, I am notifying you of this discussion: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 October 15#Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Darin Fidika. Please participate if you wish. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 15:42, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:24, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Leviathan number for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leviathan number until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 12:39, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Notice of change
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
(delivered by mabdul 23:23, 3 December 2012 (UTC))