User talk:Freshacconci/Archive 11

Thread about you on Jimbo's talk page[edit]

There's a thread about you on Jimbo's talk page. It has, er, limited merit. Just letting you know... Egg Centric 19:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eight Miles High[edit]

Hi Freshacconci! I don't suppose you have anything to add to the on-going discussion on the "Eight Miles High" talk page, regarding the paragraph dealing with Gene Clark's departure, do you? There's an IP user who is unhappy with certain aspects of it. Your input would be most welcomed. Frankly, I've said all I've got to say and can't be bothered wasting any more time on such a trivial matter. Many thanks. -- Kohoutek1138 (talk) 03:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adirondack Chair[edit]

Hi Freshacconci,

I wanted to discuss with you more about my edit you reverted on the Adirondack Chair page. The source of the information was "The Adirondack Chair" by Daniel Mack. I believe the comparison to de Stijl be accurate, not specious. I respect your contributions and would like to better understand why the information is irrelevant to the article.

Thank you!

Jasonhdavis (talk) 15:24, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nice catch[edit]

over at Sculpture Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 04:56, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Twomorerun[edit]

Hi. I wanted to point you to this page in my user space, where I'm accumulating information about this user. I still have to add diffs and clean it up, but feel feel to contribute if you're interested. Best, Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:17, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've filed at AN/I [1] Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:33, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neoclassicism[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Neoclassicism". Thank you. --203.109.211.160 (talk) 15:29, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article restructuring at the Beatles[edit]

There is a discussion taking place here, and your input would be appreciated. — GabeMc (talk) 04:12, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

To Freshacconci.

Wikipedia is not just yours to edit. It is for everyone. Who said I cannot edit the Beatles?! Everyone can edit the Beatles. When I see things that are wrong I go and change things. Not everything is fine the way is it you know. Especially if it is your interferencing. Wikipedia is for everyone. EVERYONE!!! If I want to edit I can. It is not your right to tell people what we can and can't do.

P.S. This does not just go to you; it goes to everybody.

Thank you ```` User: Rdudle (talk) 10:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Death of John Lennon[edit]

Hello my name is helter1 The corrections I made to the death of John Lennon are correct. I can discuss this and back it up with original sources and not with error filled book accounts of the incident.

thanks

Helter1 (talk) 00:20, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes I do wonder[edit]

why I bother with all this. I should pick an obscure topic and focus on that. freshacconci talktalk 01:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why the use of ROLLBACK[edit]

Why the use of ROLLBACK at my user talk page? — Cirt (talk) 00:36, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I have no idea what happened. The only thing I can think of is I was trying to rollback something else on my watch list and hit your talk page instead. Sorry about that--I should have checked the results of he rollback but was obviously in a hurry. I still have no idea what I was trying to actually rollback. freshacconci talktalk 00:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, honest mistake, no worries! ;) — Cirt (talk) 05:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you...[edit]

... for clearing the nastiness from my Talk page. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:24, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Minimal Art, Frank Stella edit...[edit]

Hey man,

Just wanted to give you a heads-up: don't know why you reverted the change I made last night to the portion of the minimal art page that incorrectly called Frank Stella's "Black Paintings" his "pinstripe" paintings, but Stella specifically abhorred this designation and critics haven't used it since the early 60's. There are no pinstripes in the pieces. The white lines are actually untreated canvas; the only paint used is black enamel in the stripes (unless you're talking about "Delta," (1958) which used red but wasn't a part of the 16 Americans show).

Also, the rest of that section makes some pretty dubious claims that I didn't bother fixing.

108.21.2.47 (talk) 02:33, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dperp (talk) 19:29, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Wiki Page for Feng Zhengjie[edit]

Hi there, Thank you for your responsible reaction about me editing the page! I am doing this edition for my History of Chinese Art class. I am from China and English is not my native language. The time given for this project is very limited so that I will not be able to translate all of this into English. If I edit this page, could you please allow it to exist at least 2 days so that I am able to show my teacher what I did? Thank you very much and looking forward to doing some thorough editing in the summer on Feng Zhengjie! Dperp (talk) 19:29, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Cardell Corbet[edit]

What true evidence have you that there are close connections tied to Corbet/colleagues, etc and his Wiki page? From what I see you are obsessed with him and his work...a wee bit worrying...Belovedsarniacherie (talk) 02:39, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The conflict of interest is addressed on the article talk page. freshacconci talktalk 03:15, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP Visual Arts in the Signpost[edit]

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Visual Arts for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 02:47, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mail Art[edit]

Why have you undone the additions to the Mail Art External Links? You've reverted to a few dead or dormant links that I was trying to remedy. Michael Lumb's universtity thesis on Mail Art is no longer available at Fortune City, it is available at the link I added. You restored a link to Greg Byrd's Mail Art Calls/projects page. This information hasn't been updated for over a year whereas the Mail Art Projects and Mail-Art Forum links i added are up to date and current. I'd like to add a few other current Mail Art links too, is this going to be a problem? Keithbates51 (talk) 10:45, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Johnson actually spelled his creation as 'correspondance' (sic), it was one of his famous wordplays - http://www.rayjohnson.org/tags/the-correspondance-school Keithbates51 (talk) 19:30, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disinformation Agents[edit]

Please continue to promote false reality/consensus reality; therefore furthering the agenda of deceiving the people.

Wikipedia only accepts Consensus Reality "references". Any reference material that is deemed out of the box or controversial is deemed "not valid" by the mindless disinformation agents who swarm this psy-op. The day will come when True information is available to humanity and not censored by the thought-police.

Information that makes the censors "hot and bothered" should be reviewed thoroughly. Things are not what they seem, brother. Wake up, please.

If you are interested in what is really going on, please review the information available on such site that you deem "invalid" (such as: http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/index.html ) nd perform the necessary research maneuvers and activite both the left and right hemispheres of the brain, then try your best to understand that you are a slave to the consensus/false reality and are enforcing the agenda. If not, pleasant dreaming.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.53.174.143 (talk) 21:39, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cute. freshacconci talktalk 01:23, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

maya deren reverted edits[edit]

Hi, just curious as to why you reverted everything on the Maya Deren page? thanks Miniphor1 (talk) 06:54, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what happened. I don't recall reverting your changes. I must have hit rollback by mistake as I don't think your changes were incorrect. On the contrary, I've been watching the progress on the article and think your edits were useful. Sorry for the confusion. I've reverted my edit. freshacconci talktalk 13:49, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Net.art[edit]

Thanks for your request of reliables sources for my change in Net.art (introduction of the [Poietic Generator]].

The reasons of the change is here : Talk:Poietic_Generator.

As I mentioned it, the Poietic Generator was up and running before the Net.art mouvement. Sources can be found here :

The Poietic Generator was also involved in typical events related to Net.art

And it still exist after the so called "death of Net.art":

Urfortunately, I didn't find any external source witch mention all the facts mentionned in the wikipedia article Poietic Generator... So, What sould we do ?--Toudou (talk) 13:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

184.148.31.23[edit]

Hi. Who is the banned user you're reverting? I'm trying to decide whether it's appropriate to put {{bannedmeansbanned}} on the talk page, or just report them. Thanks. Frood! ^Ohai _{What did I break now?} 20:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is something that has been going on for years. The whole thing is outlined here: [2]. Basically, it's a long-term spammer who has now moved on to posting her images on several articles. She usually uses different IPs--I just noticed she's changed IP yet again in the last several minutes. She's a real nuisance. freshacconci talktalk 20:43, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I just saw that (edit conflicted with you). I'm just about to open a ban proposal on WP:AN, because I didn't see anywhere that s/he is formally banned yet, just blocked. Frood! ^Ohai _{What did I break now?} 20:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]