User talk:Frmorrison

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Frmorrison, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  --Eurocopter tigre 11:08, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Add sources
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
Qualcomm Snapdragon
Lex Luthor in other media
Sony Reader
Cleanup
Comparison of smartphones
Apple Maps
Bronze Age of Comic Books
Unencyclopaedic
Intercompany crossover
Superman character and cast
Gigaom
Wikify
Bookglutton
The Last Colony
Alternative versions of Superman
Stub
Samsung Gear S
Samsung Gear
Watch OS
Huawei Ascend Mate 2 4G
Blio
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:47, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

I appreciate you trying to improve the articles for the Angry Birds games. However, information regarding the character names is generally frowned upon unless (a) it's sourced and (b) it's otherwise notable. Here is what I am referencing when I remove something per WP:GAMEGUIDE: "An article about a video game should summarize the main actions the player does to win the game. But avoid lists of gameplay weapons, items, or concepts, unless these are notable in their own right (such as the BFG9000 from the Doom series). Walk-throughs or detailed coverage of specific point values, achievements, time-limits, levels, types of enemies, character moves, character weight classes, and so on is also considered inappropriate. A concise summary is appropriate if it is essential to understanding the game or its significance in the industry. See WP:VGSCOPE." If you have any other comments or questions, please feel free to leave them here. Thanks, and happy editing! --McDoobAU93 15:30, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

September 2013[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  18:28, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Re:File:Samsung Galaxy S4 with Touchwiz.png[edit]

Hi a similar or the same image has been deleted in wikimedia commons due to licensing irregularities as users should adhere to proper image licensing on all projects. As what I see from your license it is also plagued with the same irregularities as it is incomplete and unfit for the image, yet if you wany to contest your upload you could ask for arbitration from an administrator but until a consensus has been made, the image should not appear in wiki pages. Thanks! JeromesandilanicoJSD (talk) 02:03, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

It was deleted from Commons because I didn't know that the item copyright was questionable. However, on normal Wikipedia, you can upload questionable pictures if you can claim fair use, however not on Commons. Refer to iPhone 5S for an example of fair use of iOS screenshot. Frmorrison (talk) 21:19, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Questionable images are still not allowed in wikipedia. The only reason why images like the Iphone 5S existed is because licensing and image checking is lax in the wikipedia page compared to wikimedia commons. So if you really want your image to stay then crop the image only to the screenshotJeromesandilanicoJSD (talk) 02:07, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
I cropped it to remove the device border, just showing the screenshot. Frmorrison (talk) 02:16, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Moto X: A few questions[edit]

  1. Why was the picture low-resolution?
  2. Why was the picture of the back? Change the wallpaper to be one of the stock Android wallpapers from 4.1/4.2 or a public domain image, and there shouldn't be any licensing issues because the Moto X's home screen is literally the stock Android one (which is open source)

ViperSnake151  Talk  19:42, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

I uploaded the back of the phone because it is unique; I didn't take of picture of the front. My picture may not be ideal but it is better than nothing. Frmorrison (talk) 01:48, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Commercial company as a reliable source[edit]

You have removed {unreliable sources|date=March 2014} from IPad Air article. Could you please explain to me the rationale if possible with a quote from the relevant WP guideline? I'm under impression that a source is either reliable or not. You however mean that an unreliable source can be used depending on what content is being cited? Dmatteng (talk) 17:24, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

I don't know which WP guideline applies, but using Apple links as source for device spec or release date must be fine since there is no opinion or marketing in it, it is just a fact.Frmorrison (talk) 20:16, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Yes, I agree with you. And you are also right logically. I'm currently editing an article UE Boom could you please let me know your opinion about the article and may I ask you to consider to contribute if you feel comfortable with that. Thank you. Dmatteng (talk) 18:01, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Sabretooth (comics) confusing[edit]

This edit[1] made the whole section confusing. I agree it needed to be trimmed but now all the references to Creed are uncertain whether they mean Victor or Saul. There are a few other places where the article is very confusing and I don't know enough to tell if it is the editors writing or the in-universe depictions are the source of confusion. 24.241.69.99 (talk) 23:47, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

You are right it is confusing, I added Saul when it was Sabertooth's brother. There are other sections that are also confusing, but those fixes are not as easy. The backstories of Wolverine and Sabertooth are confusing in general, and that is the fault of many different writers.Frmorrison (talk) 14:33, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Sorry about the curse in the edit summary. Who is Saul Creed? Why is he in the article? Is Sabretooth as important as Wolverine because Sabretooth's article seems longer (in the main text not the issue list) than Wolverine's now. 24.241.69.99 (talk) 15:22, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Saul is Sabertooth's dead brother. Saul is important because since Wolverine killed Saul, Sabertooth enjoys punishing Wolverine on his birthday for that murder. That conflict is important to both characters, so showing the origin of it seems important. Note I didn't add the Saul narrative, just tried to make the existing text make more sense. Wolverine has more history, however the Sabertooth editors like to write more information about him.Frmorrison (talk) 15:45, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Moto E[edit]

Materialscientist (talk) 10:05, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:S5 Active vs S5.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:S5 Active vs S5.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 09:27, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Removing AfD template[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Windows 9. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I NotifyOnline 20:40, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Apologize. We can't information deletion of Windows 9 it is concept yourself. You can read Windows and Windows 8 before creating. Thank you. Feedback me. Bryancyriel (talk) 23:40, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Warning about the reverting edits[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Angry Birds Epic. 121.1.18.241 (talk) 00:23, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

I think your "Same Games" paragraph is not supported by the sources linked and does not make any sense even if the sources supported the text, so I will continue to remove it. Go to the article's talk page if you want to try to explain what you are trying to add. Frmorrison (talk) 13:24, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Angry Birds Go!. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.1.18.239 (talk) 00:27, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

You are the one vandalizing the article with unsupported by 3rd party edits. Frmorrison (talk) 00:32, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

August 7, 2014[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Frmorrison, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.