User talk:FuegoFish

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Fictional geniuses category[edit]

Hi, FuegoFish. You may not have realized that Category:Fictional geniuses was deleted after discussion here. It shouldn't be recreated without discussion. If you wish to challenge the deletion, you may do so at WP:DRV. Thanks. —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 21:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Oh, right. That's pretty stupid. Still, I know better than to challenge the mighty juggernaut that is Wikipedia bureacracy. Trying to find fictional geniuses through hours of blind searching might be a complete waste of my time, but it's much easier than spending twice as long trying to persuade narrow-minded, self-important jerks that it shouldn't be a waste of time. --FuegoFish 22:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I Love You[edit]

For wiki theater.

Man, that was so god-damn hilarious! Thanks for that! -- penubag  08:37, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikigroaning[edit]

Your comment made my day. Thank you. --A. B. (talk) 18:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Are you mocking the Great Asperger's Council, sir?! They will herald a new golden age, where I no longer have to diagnose my own excuses for poor social skills! Where my anal-retentive, self-important obsession with articles about nerd culture will be a blessing and not a curse! YOU'LL ALL SEE!! But you're welcome. --FuegoFish 19:53, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

thank you, fuego, for that![edit]

...indeed, SIMPLISH isn't fictional: it's reality since graffity has been born... ;) ! regards, --Ullipurwin 00:53, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Proposed merge of isotope tables[edit]

As someone who has maintained Isotope table (complete) and/or Isotope table (divided) in the past, your input is needed. User:Greg L is proposing (and prematurely executing) a merge of the two tables, each about 50k, into one table of over 100k. I am opposing it, and no other editors have commented yet. Please come to Talk:Isotope table (complete) and offer your opinion. Thanks, JWB (talk) 00:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


FuegoFish: What do you think about option #3, which would keep the best of both worlds and would leave only one article? In case other options get added and the numbering gets changed, here is a historical version to show which option I’m talking about. Greg L (my talk) 20:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

I have no opinion[edit]

See above. --FuegoFish (talk) 11:18, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

The Return of the King[edit]

Please resume or at least archive the Bad Webcomics blog. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 05:07, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

No, fuck you. --FuegoFish (talk) 07:44, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
F... fuck ME? (talk) 16:17, 7 June 2010 (UTC)