User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Soren (given name)

your answer is provided in the talk page!

Happy New Year!

Fuochi d'artificio.gif

Dear Future Perfect at Sunrise,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").

Neostrada ranges

Hello ;-) I've seen that you blocked some Neostrada /19 ranges because of wikinger. You can extend them to whole /16s. We, on plwiki, often block whole /16 ranges for a few hours. Greets, Tufor (talk) 21:46, 15 March 2015 (UTC)


Having bookmarked the photo upload talk page, I noticed that you are one of the people who can program Wikipedia. I want to thank you and others who make my writing possible.Jacqke (talk) 11:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Vardis Vardinogiannis

I think the odour of smelly socks may be wafting over Vardis Vardinogiannis and related pages, again. See Alfaweiss (talk · contribs) and Loudovic19 (talk · contribs). 220 of Borg 03:14, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

User talk:Lawrencegoriel‎

Seems to be going into meltdown on his TP... threats about the media, insults, alleging paedophilia etc... cheers. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:14, 26 March 2015 (UTC)


Hey, FPaS, I saw a thread at Drmies's talk page which made me curious. How did the two articles by Darkness Shines (Summa de casibus poenitentiae and Draco Normannicus) qualify for G5? AFAIK, G5 only counts for articles made in violation of an existing block or ban; it doesn't apply retroactively to articles created before the block or ban was placed. Since DS made them with his own account, I would assume he wasn't evading a block at the time he created them; was there a topic ban in place or something that would've prevented him from creating them? If not, then I don't think the G5 criterion ever applied to the articles, and they should be restored to mainspace. Writ Keeper  01:49, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

At the time DS made those articles, he was a ban-evading sock of his previous account (now renamed to DarknessShines2 (talk · contribs) retroactively). This is why the DS account was blocked in the first place, because he'd been a ban-evading sock all along. So yes, G5 formally applied at the time. I agree it doesn't apply now. However, the two articles were so bad that moving them back into mainspace at this time without fixing them would constitute blockable source abuse. Fut.Perf. 08:37, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Hm, that's not what I expected. I guess that makes sense then, thanks for the explanation. Writ Keeper  16:30, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Possible sock

Just a heads up, looks familiar I'm kinda new to SPI reports but, I'll get through it if that's whats needed. Thanx, Mlpearc (open channel) 23:43, 28 March 2015 (UTC)


A band of the usual suspects from the Assyrian People page, keeps trolling through my edits and reverting them....they have started an edit-warring on the Arameans page.Sr 76 (talk) 15:43, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Blocked the whole lot, including yourself. Fut.Perf. 15:47, 29 March 2015 (UTC)