User talk:G-Man

NOTE:

If you post a question here I will usually (not always) reply here, as it is rather silly splitting discussions between different pages.

---

Picture of the day
	The Black Kite (Milvus migrans) is a medium-sized bird of prey easily identifiable by its angled wing and distinctive forked tail. It is widely distributed through the temperate and tropical parts of Eurasia and parts of Australasia and Oceania, with the temperate region populations tending to be migratory. Photo: Benjamint444 Archive – More featured pictures...

Archive

• User talk:G-Man/Archive 1 Feb-Oct 2003
• User talk:G-Man/Archive 2, Oct 2003-Sept 04
• User talk:G-Man/Archive 3, Sept 2004-Feb 05
• User talk:G-Man/Archive 4, Feb-June 2005
• User talk:G-Man/Archive 5, June-Nov 2005
• User talk:G-Man/Archive 6, Nov 2005-Feb 2007
• User talk:G-Man/Archive 7, Feb-Oct 2007
• User talk:G-Man/Archive 8, Oct 2007-Dec 2008

KANKER G-MAN I HEAT YOU <Post new questions at bottom of the page>

Stalking

Mmm, well, he doesn't actually seem to do anything except pick holes in other people's articles. I've not seen a single constructive contribution from him. At the moment, he's being ultra-careful, but if he starts again I will definitely report him. Deb (talk) 16:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

To Deb: I don't mind you reporting me or doing whatever, but "he doesn't actually seem to do anything except pick holes in other people's articles. I've not seen a single constructive contribution from him" is a bad-faith comment and not the type of comment that should be make, especially from an administrator. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Date delinking arbitration

I've started a request at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Date delinking which you may wish to comment on. —Locke Cole • t • c 03:15, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Centenary Square, Birmingham.jpg

File:Centenary Square, Birmingham.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Centenary Square -Birmingham -UK.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Centenary Square -Birmingham -UK.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:St Martin's church, Birmingham.jpg is now available as Commons:File:St Martins church -Birmingham -UK-1a.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Curzon Street Station 2.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Curzon Street Station -Birmingham -UK (2).jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Thought you might be interested...

After seeing your comment here, I thought that this might be of interest to you. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Birmingham council house.jpg

Hi G-man, I just found de:Datei:Rathaus-Birmingham.jpg, a picture you took, on the german wikipedia. It is also on commons (see above), but the license differs - on commons its PD, on german wikipedia it's tagged as GFDL. Both seem to be copied from here, do you still remember which license is correct? Probably the uploader on de.WP made a mistake. -- Lychee (talk) 14:01, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

I put it under PD. G-Man ^? 12:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for this clarification! -- Lychee (talk) 22:05, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Lansbury-george.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Lansbury-george.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:00, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking/Proposed decision

Hello G-Man. This is just a quick note to inform you that you have been mentioned in the above proposed decision so you might wish to take a look at it. Regards, Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 22:04, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Lansbury-george.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lansbury-george.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Beeching.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Beeching.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:46, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Leamington Spa

Hi G-Man! An article you have been concerned with has now been significantly overhauled to bring it in line with Wiki policy, guidelines, and prose style. However, without first-hand subject knowledge, the copyeditor may have left some items or citations for further clarification. If you can help with these issues please see Talk:Leamington Spa, address the different points if you can, and leave any comments there. Thanks.

Request for arbitration: Date delinking amendment motion

A request to amend the dates delinking arbitration case (filed 19 July 2009) has resulted in a motion (filed 2 August 2009) that proposes to change the restrictions imposed on you as a result of the case. The proposed amendment would affect the restrictions pertaining to 16 editors, all of whom are now being notified of the proposed amendment. Given that the proposed amendment affects your restrictions, and further that the proposed amendment will restrict the filing of further proposed amendments for a period of 30 days, your input is invited at the amendments page. You may view an unofficial table of the proposed changes here. Comments from affected parties are currently being considered by the Arbitration Committee. If you would like the arbitrators who have already voted to reconsider their votes in light of your comments, please indicate that in your comments.

For the Arbitration Committee

Seddσn ^talk|^WikimediaUK 03:31, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Arbitration motion regarding Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking

Per a motion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment:

Having considered all the requests for amendment and requests for clarification submitted following the decision in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking, the Arbitration Committee decides as follows:

(1) All remedies in the decision providing that a specified user is topic-banned from editing or discussing "style and editing guidelines" (or similar wording) are modified by replacing these words with the words "style and editing guidelines relating to the linking or unlinking of dates";

(2) All remedies in the decision providing that a specified user is "prohibited from reversion of changes which are principally stylistic, except where all style elements are prescribed in the applicable style guideline" are modified by replacing these words with the words "prohibited from reverting the linking or unlinking of dates";

(3) All editors whose restrictions are being narrowed are reminded to abide by all applicable policies and guidelines in their editing, so that further controversies such as the one that led to the arbitration case will not arise, and any disagreements concerning style guidelines can be addressed in a civil and efficient fashion;

(4) Any party who believes the Date delinking decision should be further amended may file a new request for amendment. To allow time to evaluate the effect of the amendments already made, editors are asked to wait at least 30 days after this motion is passed before submitting any further amendment requests.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Tiptoety ^talk 04:11, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Discuss this i believe your penis is hort.

RedirectName listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Metroplitan district council. Since you had some involvement with the RedirectName redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Diwas (talk) 03:15, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Requesting your opinion

Hi. I've started a discussion here. (Actually, it's a restart of a prior discussion that went cold; you can just scroll directly down to the first post I made today in that section if you want.) Can you offer your thoughts? I think it's very important. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 01:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Edward Watkin.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Edward Watkin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 22:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Wall Street Crash listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wall Street Crash. Since you had some involvement with the Wall Street Crash redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Jesse Viviano (talk) 19:26, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Civil parishes in England

Hi G-Man. Civil parishes in England, an article you have contributed to, has been reassessed to C class from Start class. Apparently many people watch and/or visit this page as an alternative to the broader Civil parishes article. I've quickly scanned it for needing a possible copy edit, but it already looks reasonably good to me. However, I did feel it just needs a little attention such as adding more inline refs. It's not tagged or anything, but if you can help ut with a source or two, it would be much appreciated. Perhaps from your other work on geography articles, you will know where to look, and we will be able to promote it to 'B'.Kudpung (talk) 13:08, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:WCML freight train.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:WCML freight train.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:16, 12 September 2011 (UTC)