User talk:Gaius stern

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Gaius stern, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -Razorflame (talk) 00:27, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Augustus[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your correction to the Augustus article. Because Wikipedia articles are often worked on by large numbers of people, we don't sign individual contributions (although anyone can see from the page history which users have edited an article). The principle of collaborative editing also means that if you'd like to correct an error, you should edit the text that's already there rather than append a separate correction. If you aren't sure how best to integrate a correction into the article, you can bring it to the attention of other editors on the talk page (e.g., Talk:Augustus).

Thanks again for the correction! EALacey (talk) 18:19, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bay area academic league[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Bay area academic league requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:10, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Requesting citations[edit]

Hello. I see you've requested a citation for material at Publius Clodius Pulcher. We have citation templates designed expressly for this purpose. I've changed your edit accordingly, appending the appropriate template [citation needed] to the end of the queried source and sentence. You're welcome of course to query article material but please, don't interrupt the text you wish to challenge. We've templates for this, and for virtually every editing issue, and all are available at WP:Templates. Thank you. Haploidavey (talk) 21:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

I have to say, that whole article's not only under-cited but is excessively reliant on pro-Cicero opinion. It's in dire need of balanced, up-to-date secondary sourcing. Haploidavey (talk) 21:52, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Btw, I've now removed the offending sentence. Maybe some editor got a bit over-creative with that very slim, passing reference to Clodius' death in Suetonius' Life of Caesar. It adds nothing, and it contradicts nothing, so not worth keeping. Haploidavey (talk) 22:32, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Publius Quinctilius Varus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Richard H. Stern[edit]

Sorry, but you can't add materials about people's personal lives without citing reliable third party sources. bd2412 T 20:20, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Since the state of Maryland declared him a deadbeat dad in the case Stern v. Stern, is it proper to cite that neutral third party source as the source? Likewise for the other case which he lost to his disabled son? I am guessing that a FN citing the case is a proper neutral authority. Gaius stern (talk) 20:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC) GCS

Did the court issue an opinion stating that he was "a deadbeat dad" or did it merely order him to pay child support for which he was in arrears. If you are intent on including this material, cite the case and quote the court without making a personal characterization of the court's language. The facts will speak for themselves. Also, we typically put details of a subjects personal life in a separate section, even if those details are considered scandalous. See, e.g., Newt Gingrich#Personal life. bd2412 T 20:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

The court ruling calls him a deadbeat dad (I had some trouble correctly making the link here to Wiki entry) and ordered him to pay an extra year of child support for his children. In Maryland the normal age of adulthood is 18, but Richard Stern was required to pay an additional year (to 19) as a punishment. This was a very unusual punishment, and the only time I have heard it applied.