User talk:Gary Dee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Thank you[edit]

Modest Barnstar.png The Modest Barnstar
Thanks for your recent contributions! -129.49.72.78 (talk) 18:57, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Thx too. ;) --Gary Dee (talk) 19:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Gary Dee. You have new messages at Talk:Saturn.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I Strongly agree with the link removal. Thanks for being bold and removing them.--Anderson I'm Willing To Help 21:43, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Thx. ;) --Gary Dee 17:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you![edit]

Erdbeerteller01.jpg For your malware edits particularly Huge-LQG Martin451 (talk) 21:57, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Thx. :) --Gary Dee 17:53, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Dailygalaxy.com[edit]

What evidence do you have that dailygalaxy.com has malware that is of sufficent nature that warrents it's blanking from all refereces on the wiki? Is there some official decision to do this or is your actions unilateral? The links you pasted on an article I watch shows nothing more then some confused scanners confused by obscuficated code in an Adsense script. Got anything more then that? Got any evidence it's not an issue with their advertisers and not the website, got any evidence it's not temporary and won't be fixed once the offending AD is removed from the AD network? These things happen a lot in some of the lower end AD serving companies, and it's not the websites fault. So where is the official decision that this warrants removal as a source from all these pages? — raekyt 12:57, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Regarding you link removal at Saturn, Dailygalaxy.com does not appear to be malicious.--Anderson I'm Willing To Help 21:17, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Dailygalaxy.com has been re-added to Saturn, Because it has proven to be, not malicious.--Anderson I'm Willing To Help 23:10, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Dailygalaxy II[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Gary Dee. You have new messages at Talk:Potential cultural impact of extraterrestrial contact.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

These dailygalaxy.com links are not malicious, so i am restoring them on every article you remove them from.--Anderson I'm Willing To Help 01:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. I'm sorry to have to issue a formal warning, because your heart is clearly in the right place, but in the last few days you've made probably more than 500 edits about "malicious links" and not one of them seems to be valid. You're taking warnings by a bot as evidence of harmful intent when a closer examination shows that's not the case. As a result you've removed tons of useful links - what else can we call this other than disruptive? You really have to stop doing this.

I've reverted a lot of these edits but I have to check each one carefully on the off-chance that you're right, and I've simply run out of steam. In all decency you should revert the rest yourself - it should only take a couple of hours. andy (talk) 09:41, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

I've worked around the clock restoring these dailygalaxy links. I'll get the rest restored today.--Anderson I'm Willing To Help 21:23, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Hmm. A quick perusal of the dailygalaxy site indicates that its a linkspam site that does not provide encyclopaedic-quality references. Instead of working overtime to add them, I suggest working overtime to delete them. Sheesh. I mean, it looks like a really fun pop-sci website, and I like to read that kind of stuff when I get tired. But the coverage is pointedly superficial, and fundamentally not trustworthy -- you can't actually reference it to support the truth or validity of a claim. User:Linas (talk) 06:47, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
+1. Gary Dee 14:09, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Some Advice[edit]

Gary, i would like to give you some advice. when it comes to malware, sometimes it's just a piece of Javascript that can be malicious. Remember, These mistakes can Boomerang on you. Please be more careful when it comes to malware. If you ask me, You might want to consider using a well-trusted malware checker on the internet, To help you avoid making more mistakes in the future.--Anderson I'm Willing To Help 22:08, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Andy. I am a well trusted Malware Checker Myself. You can check it here:

Just to avoid making NO mistakes about it. Regards. --Gary Dee 20:22, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

I'm quite sure that the only thing that is malicious about it is a piece of Javascript.--Anderson I'm Willing To Help 21:13, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, well, perhaps Gary Dee is quite correct. The dailygalaxy.com website is NOT a reputable news source that is suitable for referencing in wikipedia, anyway; I'm dealing with some sock-puppeted edits to some quantum non-sense articles right now that ref dailygalaxy. User:Linas (talk) 06:43, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
+1 Gary Dee 14:12, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

November 2014[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at History of Gmail. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SD0001 (talk) 13:15, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Yep. Thx for Notifying. In case for future, so long "wrong" ones, just rectify (UNDO), in case you see (OR find stuff), and notify that you did some time be (Because i do not start META-Talks. AGF is the apply. Thank you from the bottom. Happy Thanksgiving Day. :) Thanks one more time, as you can not get more of these THX. Also thx to Ian, as he is not aware of being trapped for some amount of time. And i want to give a great part of my heart to Peter2000. THX all ;) --Gary Dee 22:45, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
No prob(lem) i forgot. Just pick undo. --Gary Dee 22:47, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Ohh yeah, look @talkpages FOR Details. Thanks. ;) --Gary Dee 22:48, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

My goodness, i forgot some thing(s), whether you find it (as you title it as a unconstructive edits), read the TP first before. Thanks again and, its not about that @ all. If you are a User, being not prepared, and if you do not know (possibly), check this article from 2006. There might be some reasons of concern. --Gary Dee 23:00, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Igfxtray.exe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page System32. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Fixed. Thanks. --88.207.187.124 (talk) 14:38, 4 December 2014 (UTC)