User talk:George vanden Barselaar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Grace in Kashmir Shaivism[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Grace in Kashmir Shaivism, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from As a copyright violation, Grace in Kashmir Shaivism appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Grace in Kashmir Shaivism has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Grace in Kashmir Shaivism. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Grace in Kashmir Shaivism, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. TheRingess 05:55, 10 October 2006 (UTC)


It looks like you are interested in Kashmir Shaivism. I appreciate that and I hope we can cooperate in the future. It would be nice to get acquainted since there are so few of us that have an interest in this field. I saw you made an edit in my personal pages. In the future please contact me only through the discussion page because the other pages are my study notes in preparation of future postings. Thank you very much. Visarga (talk) 08:47, 16 February 2008 (UTC)


Thanks for your note on my talk page. I'm glad you took my deletions so well. Welcome to wikipedia. Your expertise and knowledge will be greatly appreciated here. TheRingess (talk) 02:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Citation Needed[edit]

Thank you for the great article about Vijnana_Bhairava. You have written it in the most globally accepted and accurate way possible. The only thing that pulls me back is your statement - "The Vijnana Bhairava is one chapter from the ancient Rudrayamala Tantra". Can you please give the a source / citation, since I have gone through the complete original Rudrayamala, and was unable to find this chapter. Please note that, the only reason I was unable to find is due to my insufficient ability of searching OR maybe due to oversight I may have missed it. In no way do I want to contradict your claim, that it is indeed a chapter of Rudrayamala Tantra. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Debnathsandeep (talkcontribs) 12:28, 3 December 2009 (UTC)