User talk:Geraldo Perez

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

The Atticus Institute (film)[edit]

Hi, I was wondering how to format this movie The Atticus Institute (film), do I included (film) as default or just leave it as The Atticus Institute? Valoem talk contrib 03:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Valoem: You don't need the disambiguator "(film)" if there is no other topic with the same name. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)


Note of my retiring[edit]

i will no longer editing articles and talk pages on Wikipedia, and also, i will no longer reverting, creating, and edit everything on Wikipedia, i will only continue to view pages in this site, because i will returning to upload bumpers of kids channels, comedy and more on YouTube, bye good friend. Gabucho76 (last account) (talk) 22:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

190.26.196.227 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · edit filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:22, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

One edit[edit]

Sorry I don't know what you mean here[1]. All you did was place an irrelevant gap between words. --Boy Seeks Girl Tonight (talk) 22:24, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

@Boy Seeks Girl Tonight: That message was meant for the edit prior to yours. You were fixing something that the previous edit added to the article that did not belong. I didn't notice when I wrote the edit summary that you were not the one who added the unreferenced bio info. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:28, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
I see, ok thanks. --Boy Seeks Girl Tonight (talk) 11:55, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Restore reverted edits and deleted pages[edit]

Which user do I have to be in order restore reverted edits and deleted pages? D'ohmer (talk) 03:31, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Category:Boomerang original programs[edit]

I noticed you nominated this for speedy deletion as being created by a banned user, however, I don't see any evidence that the User:D'ohmer has been banned, can you please explain? I don't see why we couldn't have a category for original programming on the "Boomerang" network, if they have original programming (not sure if they do). -War wizard90 (talk) 03:31, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

@War wizard90: Check the logs for the page and the SPI that the speedy links to. This is one of his targets and he is recreating all the articles that he created in his last visit to wiki - obvious sock of a banned user - everything gets deleted on sight per WP:BANREVERT. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:34, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

I must be KuhnstylePro to restore reverted edits and deleted pages. D'ohmer (talk) 03:36, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Ok, I looked through some of the socks contrib's, and while I didn't find this particular category, I didn't feel like sifting through a bunch of contribs to find it, if you are already familiar with the sock's M.O. then I'll just assume you're correct, he does appear to focus on cartoon/video game related categories. Also his response above, seems to be something a sock of KuhnstylePro would respond with. Thanks -War wizard90 (talk) 03:40, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
@War wizard90: The articles initially in the category were previously deleted as banned user created. If the category itself has value please create it after this version is deleted and populate it with articles that were not created by KuhnstylePro, which this current iteration was. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:51, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
@War wizard90: Hey there, I too am familiar with this timesuck user, and it's clearly him. The article Tattle Cartoon!, which GP also nommed for speedy was a workaround for the sock's other nonsensical project Phibian Mike, which was salted to discourage future vandalism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:30, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
@Cyphoidbomb: Ok, good to know, I just didn't make the connection initially, I added the sock template to D'ohmer as a suspected sock of KuhnstylePro. -War wizard90 (talk) 04:34, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

BRAVO (poker)[edit]

Hi I made an article on that page awhile ago and some sources styled the format in that manner what should I use per WP:Primary? Valoem talk contrib 23:44, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Suggest "Bravo Pit and Poker" - per http://www.g3newswire.com/us-bravo-sycuan-poker-management-system/ - appears to be name that matches wiki naming conventions and most common usage. All caps is a stylization. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks and also HIV immunity to Immunity to HIV/AIDS or stay as is? Valoem talk contrib 07:29, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Teen Titans Go! (TV series)[edit]

I'm further confused by 75.185.74.56's edit summary here which says, "I meant it's NOT noteworthy and is just a fandom head canon". That sounds like they are deliberately introducing phony content. ? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:38, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I agree it is phony content. Head canon means to extrapolate from what is shown to fill in gaps left by the creator of the show or expand the fictional universe well-beyond what the creator intended. It is fan creation and it should never be in an article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:42, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Their statements are incoherent. That's not helping... Also, I notice StarfireAndRobinLoveEachother in the article's edit history. That editor made changes in the same general area. Also The AnonymousTroll (now blocked for username violation) made similar edits. Under normal circumstances that would be more than sufficient for a block on duck behavior. (As if I have to tell you that...) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:53, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
I would guess meat puppets as this is the type of fan fiction writing sometimes supported by groups of people. One of the banes of trying get kid shows somewhere in the general area of being somewhat encyclopedic.

Kim - Kickin' It[edit]

You called my edit of the Kim character's name "vandalism" and a made up name when it is in fact, not. I added to remember for later as well and did not source it because I could not find a source at the time other than the show itself. Her full name of "Kim Beulah Crawford" is revealed in the season 3 episode "Jack Stands Alone" by Milton. If I add it again with this clip as a source, will I not be marked as vandalism again? Clip - Jack Stands Alone - Kickin' It - Disney XD Official SJJM4EVER talk contrib 06:48, 21 January 2015 (ATC)

SJJM4EVER: I said it appeared to be vandalism as it looks to be pure invention to me, not that it was vandalism (canned messages are sometimes too abrupt). One form of subtle article corruption is name invention so I am always suspicious when I see unreferenced name enhancements. If there is an in-show mention use that episode as a reference and also include as much in the reference as possible about the context of the reveal, was it an introduction, written on something, a passing mention. Episode name with timestamp would be great for verifiability, but timestamp is not strictly necessary. Use {{cite episode}} if you really want to do it right. Unnecessary to link to a clip as the episodes are available to stream for anyone who wants to verify. Don't change the section header as that needs to reflect the official credit. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:05, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
I see you have already done it. Link to official site for video is fine. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:08, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for any confusion I may have caused. SJJM4EVER (talk) 23:12, 25 January 2015 (UTC)