User talk:Ggarcia1207

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Ggarcia1207, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

While your contributions are welcomed, could you please check the spelling before you save. - David Biddulph (talk) 23:37, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Wild Mountain Honey(1976 song), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You have provided no indications of notability on the song - do not continue to recreate it without doing so. MikeWazowski (talk) 01:43, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wild Mountain Honey(1976 song). It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. MikeWazowski (talk) 13:05, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wild Cat(1927 song)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Wild Cat(1927 song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indications of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MikeWazowski (talk) 13:06, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Wild Cat(1927 song) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wild Cat(1927 song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wild Cat(1927 song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MikeWazowski (talk) 17:17, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Wild Cat (1927 song), you may be blocked from editing. MikeWazowski (talk) 23:35, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

About your user page.[edit]

I suggest that you don't ever put your date of birth anywhere on the net. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AllThatJazz2012 (talkcontribs) 07:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Latin wiki[edit]

Ave Garcia, Estimado Garcia,

Is there a place where I can ask for help? The administrators (magisters) over at the latin wiki are a bit extreme, or cultic. I'm sure my grammar is correct but they seem to abuse this dub sig notifications. In this instance, there is no 'classic latin' word for identity. Identitas is considered new or medieval latin. This is not the only instance of abuse but there are others. The article was 'improved by the way' meaning a lot of the core ideas were simply removed. So you have great grammar with hardly any content. Thanks.--Jondel (talk) 06:48, 3 December 2012 (UTC)