User talk:Ggdlmnt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome[edit]

Hello Ggdlmnt, and Welcome to Wikipedia!New-Bouncywikilogo.gif

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Ggdlmnt, good luck, and have fun. --Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:27, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Ggdlmnt, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Ggdlmnt! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Creative Disc Year-End Chart for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Creative Disc Year-End Chart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creative Disc Year-End Chart until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mediran (tc) 09:06, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I see that you have blanked the article. I have deleted it, according to your wishes. If you wish to recover the content, don't hesitate to ask me! Regards, -- Luk talk 09:17, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Yes, i deleted that article. Sometime i will recover the content, so wait for that time and I will ask you. Ggdlmnt (talk) 09:23, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
No problem. I can move it right now to your user space so you can work on it, or you may request undeletion at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion when you feel like it. Cheers! -- Luk talk 09:28, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Help:Userspace draft[edit]

Hey Ggdlmnt and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions! Yey! Anyway, I suggest you to use a draft in creating new articles. Because as what happened earlier, you're needing more time in improving your article. With a draft, you can take your time in adding what is appropriate in the article without a hurry or a feeling that "my article might be deleted". It's just a suggestion but I'm sure it will help you. Also, please read WP:GNG, WP:V or WP:CHARTS for more info. Thanks, Mediran (tc) 09:27, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Hey Mediran and thank you! Haha. Thank you for your help, I'm new here so I need more advice like this. So, once again thank you for your help! CheersGgdlmnt (talk) 09:31, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information.svg Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:51, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Creative Disc[edit]

Can you show me any sources that show that Creative Disc is an acceptable source of charts? Newspapers that publish it? Record companies that issue press releases about their positions on it? Sources showing that Creative Disc is affiliated with the IFPI, Nielsen, or another nationally recognized measurement firm? It won't pass WP:Record charts unless you can, and {{singlechart}} only points at charts that pass guidelines.—Kww(talk) 00:35, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

In that case, you should not be adding the chart to any articles: they don't pass our guidelines for inclusion.—Kww(talk) 00:56, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
It shouldn't be in any articles. Read WP:Record charts#Suitable charts.—Kww(talk) 01:20, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

The Croatian chart is from Croatian Radiotelevision, the official national broadcaster of Croatia, and reports data for all Croatian radio stations. Rádio Top 100 Oficiálna is published by the Hungarian branch of the IFPI. The Official Lebanese Top 20 is published in seven different magazines as well as being broadcast on two different television networks (including MTV) and one radio network.—Kww(talk) 22:50, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of number-one digital singles of 2009 (Indonesia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Madonna
List of number-one digital singles of 2010 (Indonesia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Usher
List of number-one digital singles of 2013 (Indonesia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to James Arthur

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:11, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Friendly caution[edit]

I can't help but notice that your edits include both the Creative Disk charts and the Venezuelan Pop Rock General chart. Today, I had considerable trouble with an editor from Spain that was insisting on including the Creative Disk charts and making false edits involving the Venezuelan Pop Rock General chart. That's a big coincidence, so I just wanted to make sure that you are aware that it isn't permitted to edit anonymously and while logged in on the same topic, or to communicate off-wiki with other editors and encourage them to make edits for you.—Kww(talk) 01:20, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia keeps track of every edit you make: like this one and this one. Care to claim that you've never made edits related to the Venezuelan Pop Rock General chart again?—Kww(talk) 01:35, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Editing without reliable reference[edit]

Hi, sure, it's alright. As long as the source is indeed correct, you can cite them to the Wikipedia page. If you use citations, then unknown IP users will not easily change them anymore as well. Ccliman (talk) 12:17, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Just saw this discussion. No, it is not OK to add information without a reliable source, and, if your information includes mention of a living person, can result in being blocked, even if the information is true.—Kww(talk) 15:28, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:FifthHarmony.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:FifthHarmony.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Carry You.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Carry You.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Justice Crew - Best Night.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Justice Crew - Best Night.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:UnionJ.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:UnionJ.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Carry You (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Radio One
Love Has Come for Me (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to You Are
S4 (band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Tegal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

WP:BADCHARTS[edit]

Please do not add the Creative Disc Top 50 or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS to any Wikipedia articles.—Kww(talk) 01:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Fifth Harmony - The X Factor USA.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Fifth Harmony - The X Factor USA.jpg, which you've attributed to The X Factor USA. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:15, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Start One Sensation.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Start One Sensation.jpg, which you've attributed to YS Media Entertainment. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:18, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Sexy, Smart, Sweet & Sentimental.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sexy, Smart, Sweet & Sentimental.jpg, which you've attributed to YS Media Entertainment. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:21, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:S4Wiki.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:S4Wiki.jpg, which you've attributed to YS Media Entertainment. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:26, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Nu Dimension X Factor Indonesia.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Nu Dimension X Factor Indonesia.jpg, which you've attributed to Tribun News. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:49, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

ATRL.NET[edit]

Random posts on forums, such as http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.php?p=14817784#14817784, are not acceptable sources.—Kww(talk) 04:42, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

I noticed all the templates above, and felt like I had to act on them quickly. I don't see any reason to believe that you are the owner of any of those images. By marking those images the way you did, you were attempting to give the entire world permission to use copyrighted material against the copyright holders wishes.—Kww(talk) 04:52, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Brave (Sara Bareilles song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:30, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Crazy Kids may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:32, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Side Effects of You may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:35, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anggun discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:29, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Waiting All Night may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

discography articles[edit]

When you create or edit discography articles, please don't add blank Indonesian and Malaysian columns that can never be filled in.—Kww(talk) 21:29, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Yes, it was. But in Agnes Monica discography, you created it that way.—Kww(talk) 01:53, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Why on earth did you restore those columns to the Anggun discography?—Kww(talk) 14:54, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Sources[edit]

Nearly every edit you have made today has either not included a source or says something that isn't in the sources in the article. Don't do that. It is not my job to clean up after you. It isn't anybody's job to clean up after you. If you can't provide a reliable source for the information that you are adding to articles, then don't add it.—Kww(talk) 00:08, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Let's be very, very clear: if I find you posting data from a forum again, you will be blocked indefinitely. This is your final warning.—Kww(talk) 01:36, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for ignoring the above warning. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

.—Kww(talk) 03:46, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ggdlmnt (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

I'm sorry if I made something wrong. But i'm clearly don't have any idea why I got blocked. May explain why?Ggdlmnt (talk) 03:54, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Looking at comments both above and below this request, it is obvious that you either have no willingness, or no ability, to understand the problem you have caused. To be unblocked you will need to convince us that this is no longer the case. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:50, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page for as long as you are blocked.

See a source here or here?—Kww(talk) 04:34, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
So, okay i forgot to give a source. It comes from Billboard. Is that the reason I got blocked? Ggdlmnt (talk) 06:49, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Let's see. You were warned about adding unsourced material and material from blogs. You had a bunch of edits reverted specifically because they were unsourced. You were told you would be blocked the next time. You then went and undid the reversions that had specifically called out that the reason for the reversion was that the material was unsourced (see the edit summary?), gave no explanation for the reversion, and still didn't point to a reliable source. Now, you say that you "forgot" to add the source. Why do you think you were blocked?—Kww(talk) 07:26, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
I don't know exactly why i get blocked, thats why im asking you. And i'm a human right? i do forgot sometimes. You can't blame me if I forgot something.Ggdlmnt (talk) 07:36, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
You were blocked because you repeated misbehaviour after a final warning. The idea that you could forget to add a source when reverting an edit that specifically said "unsourced" is pretty unbelievable. Do you seriously want me to believe that when you reverted seven edits in four minutes that you could forget that the edit summary said "unsourced" inbetween seeing the edit and pressing the undo button?—Kww(talk) 07:41, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm going to bed now. What I'm really looking for here is a credible reason to believe that this kind of problem won't repeat itself, and a big part of that is believing that you both understand the problem and are willing to be honest about it. This set of reverts is one thing. Your earlier set of reverts where you put Indonesian columns a second time after falsely claiming you hadn't done so earlier, following the set of edits where you continued to add the Creative Disc charts even after you were aware that the consensus was that the chart was unusable all make me skeptical. I'm still listening, though: talk. Try to convince me that you understand what you are doing wrong and won't do it any more.—Kww(talk) 07:53, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Okay I know i'm wrong if you reversed to Creative Disc case. I'm not doing that again. Even when I use Indonesian chart column, I didn't put any Creative Disc thing in that too. And, for the unsourcable edit, i've almost never use Edit summary everytime I edit any articles. I'm sorry, i was like have no idea what was that until a few days ago. Ggdlmnt (talk) 09:52, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
The edit summary is a minor part. The problem is that when you were completely aware that the material had been objected to as unsourced, you put it back and, when confronted about it, you told a lame story. You did a very similar thing with this edit where you also restored unsourced numbers for no apparent reason. You should never include unsourced material in the first place, but it's even worse to put unsourced material back in after it has been removed. Why do you keep doing that?—Kww(talk) 14:12, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Well, im not the first person to put Indonesia column in that page. Im just adding new albums in there. And, when i put that charts back, i already find the source in Indonesian page of that articles. Im sorry, i think its like an official for an airplay chartsGgdlmnt (talk) 16:20, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
This would go faster if you actually answered my questions. Look at this edit for example. You added back material that had been removed. You claimed that the album had hit number 1 on the Indonesian charts when you know that there's no Indonesian chart. You inserted claims that the album had sold 2,000,000 copies worldwide, and specific claims of 1,000,000 sales in Indonesia; 150,000 in Malaysia; and 15,000 in Singapore, all without a single source. Why did you insert data that you had no source for? Are you copying data from http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskografi_Anggun to English Wikipedia? You can't do that: you can't even copy data from English Wikipedia to English Wikipedia.—Kww(talk) 16:58, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm not copying data. I'm just making a new articles using some sources in Indonesian Wikipedia. And if you blocked me because of that, it's funny because I edited that articles on May 14, and you give me a final warning on May 16, and then I don't think I edited it again. Seriously, I need to know why. Ggdlmnt (talk) 02:07, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ggdlmnt (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

I promise that I'm not gonna add any Indonesian charts to any songs/albums/discographies articles. And if I found something about Indonesian Airplay Charts, I'm gonna ask User:Kww first befor adding it. Promise. Thank you :) Ggdlmnt (talk) 11:14, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

From the discussion below it is unclear if you even understand the reason for the block, so it would be unwise to lift it at this time. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:21, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page for as long as you are blocked.

You are still missing the point. It isn't the Indonesian charts, it's the blog sourced material, wiki sourced material, and unsourced material. The charts are just one example.—Kww(talk) 15:07, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
I think the last one is when i publish Billboard charts before it was published on the web right? Ggdlmnt (talk) 16:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
That was when I decided that you didn't understand what you needed to do, yes. It wasn't the only thing you had done wrong, though. It was just one more in a long list. Talking to you, it doesn't seem like you understand why what you are doing is wrong. You've never really answered my questions about this edit, for example. Why did you revert that edit? Why did you think that putting in all those numbers about sales when there was no source for the numbers was a good idea?—Kww(talk) 16:30, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
It was there before i adding any albums. here. I'm just adding it back just like before i edit anything. Ggdlmnt (talk) 17:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Why did you add it back? I had gone through and fixed the problems with the article, and you put all the problems back in. Why? That's the question I keep asking that you don't answer. Why did you think it was better to have an article full of unsourced numbers and chart positions? Why did you put put them back in? Why did you put those Billboard positions back in without a source when they had been removed for being unsourced?—Kww(talk) 17:16, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm just adding it back just like before i edit anything. You know? I'm just adding that thing again. Because it was sourced for me, this. You blame me because i get caught? I mean, it's not fully my false. I'm just adding it back like the original one before i edit anything. And for the Billboard, it was sourced. you can see it on billboard charts RIGHT NOW Ggdlmnt (talk) 17:31, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
There was never a link to pxdrive.com in the article. There wasn't one there before you edited it. There wasn't one there after you edited it. Even if there was, it's a copy of an old Wikipedia article that cannot be used as a source. Things can't be "sourced for you". That doesn't even make sense. They are sourced by including the information about where the data came from in the article. Your refusal to do that, your complete lack of understanding about what constitutes a reliable source, and your constant inclusion of material without showing where it is from is the reason you are blocked. I can't refuse your unblock request because I'm the one that blocked you in the first place. Some other admin will review this discussion. I will say that I don't believe you will ever understand how to edit correctly.—Kww(talk) 17:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

As an additional note to any reviewing admin, Ggdlmnt is simply lying about the effects of his edits to Anggun discography. He performed a large series of edits, I removed a large amount of unsourced material, and his reverts put the article back the way it was at the completion of his edits, not the way it was before he touched it, as he claims above.—Kww(talk) 18:15, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

not the way it was before he touched it, as he claims above. It's completely not true. I reverted it back like the way before. I add it back the Indonesian charts and the certifications like the way before. this is my first edit of the article and you can see the charts and certifications is already there. And my first edit was changing IND to IDN. And my last edits was only moving Mimpi, Takut, Tua Tua Keladi, Yang Hilang to compilation albums and adding Best-Of: Design of a Decade to compilation albums too. And adding Open Hearts too, and also put some songs. And also that was before i get my final warning, if that was the reason i got blocked and I'm doing nothing after my final warning, I shouldn't be blocked if the reason was about Anggun Discography, because it was befor I got my final warning, like I said, before. So what Kww said, performed a large series of edits was moving some albums from studio albums to compilation albums, becaus it's compilation albums. And then removed a large amount of unsourced material was Kww delete any charts from Indonesia and Malaysia, also delete a certifications that already there before i edit enything, so i revert all bak the way it was.
And if the Billboard thingy is my problem, i edit a charts that not published yet to the website, but then it comes from some forum, i knew it's not a reliable source so i didn't put any sources yet, and Kww delete all my changes. And the next day, the charts published by Billboard then i revert all back. Ggdlmnt (talk) 23:33, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
How can you describe reverting every change that I made while keeping every change that you made as only "putting it back the way it was before"?
This is why I don't think it would be reasonable to ever unblock you. Not only do you lie when confronted about problems with your edits (things like that you "forgot" to include sources for Billboard, or that you had "never edited the Venezuelan Pop General chart" when you clearly had, or that you hadn't added columns that you had added), you tell lies that are easily checked. It's like you hope that you can trick us into unblocking you. —Kww(talk) 00:07, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
I said I MOVE SOME ALBUMS TO COMPILATION ALBUMS but I revert the the Indonesian charts and the certifications back. Understand? For the Venezuelan Chart, I only add some songs, that's it! and it's sourced. What i mean is, i thought you blame me for something on Venezuelan Charts that i didn't do lke maybe violation. Ggdlmnt (talk) 04:25, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
I only brought up the Venezuelan charts again to point out that your first reaction to most challenges to your edits is to either lie about having done it or lie about your reason for having done it. You didn't get blocked for making one mistake. You got blocked for making bad edit after bad edit, not learning from warnings, and your habit of lying about your edits when they are challenged.—Kww(talk) 05:04, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
First, you can'T blame me and judge me as a liar. I'm forget I told you this like for i dont know how many times. And, i told the SORRY word for 3 times. I forgot something, and that's so human. You can't just judge me as a liar while god didn't, dude seriously. THAT WAS A FEW TIMES BEFOR I GOT FINAL WARNING.
Let's be very, very clear: if I find you posting data from a forum again, you will be blocked indefinitely. This is your final warning.—Kww(talk) 01:36, 16 May 2013 (UTC) that's what you write on May 16, and I didn't made anything wrong like the crap you told above. That's so awful when you still use my mistake before i got warned. I'm not saying that you were wrong and I'm not saying that i was right either. I made mistake, i forgot something, I SAY SORRY. I DO APOLOGIZE like the hell. I just can't stand with the fact you blame me everything i've done. For the Anggun Discography case, you can also blame the people who made it first befor i edit it back like the original one. Ggdlmnt (talk) 05:38, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Raisa Andriana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Indonesian
Wild & Free (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to American

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:27, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Indonesian Movie Awards 2013[edit]

Hello Ggdlmnt,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Indonesian Movie Awards 2013 for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sulfurboy (talk) 10:15, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Article notability notification[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Sexy, Sweet, Smart & Sentimental, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Sexy, Sweet, Smart & Sentimental" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 22:45, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Article notability notification[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, She Is My Girl, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "She Is My Girl" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 22:49, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of S4 (band)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on S4 (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Krystaleen 15:14, 11 January 2014 (UTC)