User talk:Glitzy queen00

XRII

I think you've gone off topic on your rewrite of this page. An x-ray image intensifier is simply a component of a C-arm (converts and amplifies the x-ray signal into light) and not the actual system. With the improvement of flat-panels detectors, there have been a lot of flat-panel based C-arms introduced (vs XRII-based ones). A lot of the description and applications mentioned are modality-based and not really part of the discussion of XRII. (e.g. fluoroscopy and angiography, which aren't exclusive to XRII-based systems) You'll probably want to make a separate C-arm article and move most of the information you added to XRII into it. --Fuzzball! ^(talk) 14:13, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

• Update on X-ray image intensifier Fuzzball! ^(talk) 13:13, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

• And again. Fuzzball! ^(talk) 13:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

CTA

Good work on CTA page. Keep it up. Keep sharing your knoledge for it multiplies when you share it. Abushahin 18:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

CTPA

I hope you don't mind I've moved your nice CTPA page to CT pulmonary angiogram. It presently is rather low on sources. Could you provide some? We need to discuss the technique and also its evidence base (e.g. the ANTELOPE study).

Good to have a radiographer on board! There's a lot of stuff to be done in medical imaging. JFW | T@lk 21:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Reply

I don't mind you moving the article. Thank you for letting me know. Almost all the information on the article is from first hand experience and personal knowledge, but I'll try and get some references on there. If you have any information on trials please feel free to add that but I'd like to keep the information on the scanning techniques as it is. And as a radiographer I know a lot more about scannning than a lot of doctors so I'm happy to add as much as I can. Heather 15:06, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Glitzy_queen00

Image tagging for Image:Ring artifact.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Ring artifact.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Ap_lateral_elbow.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ap_lateral_elbow.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 18:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Axial_appendicular_skeleton.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Axial_appendicular_skeleton.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:33, 2 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:33, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Barium_swallow.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Barium_swallow.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Where have you gone?

Your radiography work is very much appreciated. I hope you'll be back sometime! JFW | T@lk 22:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Image request

Hi,

do you have any images for the osteoporosis article? It's our current WP:MCOTW, and the only free image I found was from a DEXA machine, and it's an ugly photograph.

cheers, --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 22:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Further to your note on Talk:Osteoporosis, we could use images of a vertebral fracture and possibly a #NOF. I'm sure you see those occasionally :-). JFW | T@lk 09:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you very much for sharing your image of a midline shift here [1]. I'm working on the image research for an educational textbook, and hope you might be willing to sign a permission letter for us to use the image in a forthcoming textbook. Please contact me at carcabascio@jblearning.com. Thank you. Ca.jbpub (talk) 14:31, 30 November 2010 (UTC) Carolyn

Thanks - barnstarification

For your contributions to imaging-related articles, especially providing original radiography images. Thank you! JFW / t@lk 17:39, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

You have filled a void with your great images of osteoporosis and ankylosing spondylitis! Here is a barnstar. Enjoy it. JFW | T@lk 17:39, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Help with pelvic / hip images

I've split up a hip dysplasia (human) page from the hip dysplasia article focused on the canine condition. It's not all polished yet. I have no trouble finding text, but I don't dare copy out the images because of the copyrights. But without there is a lot of stuff that doesn't work. I found an x-ray of a healthy hip, but it's not the right direction for most of the lines. The following would be highly appreciated: Anterposterior pelvic image showing the "teardrop" (if you could spare a line and point it out I'd be grateful) Subluxated hips or hip joints with dysplasia An image of a hip where the Shenton's line can be drawn in

Any other images you have that might be useful will be most welcome. I copied out image 1 from another language, but find it rather confusing than clarifying.

Before you have a fit looking at the article I should tell you that the references are not all in yet and some of the text still needs some editing. I'm currently trying to find references that will meet the wiki standards as far as I can find out. Sorry for bothering you but there doesn't seem to be an orthopedic specialist on the medicine panel. Lisa4edit

Thanks so much for the images. Any other ones you come across plse. keep that page in mind. It already looks a lot more professional with these x-rays in. Many thanks again, you're a treasure!! Lisa4edit —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lisa4edit (talk • contribs) 06:21, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Empty delta

Heather, I am working on cerebral venous sinus thrombosis with the specific aim of getting it up to good article status. Things would be immensely helped with some neuroimaging of this fascinating disorder, such as the classic "empty delta sign" on CT or possibly one showing venous infarcts, or perhaps even one of those beautiful digital reconstructions of an MR venogram showing the filling defect!

Your help is, as always, appreciated. JFW | T@lk 19:51, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

I am not very used to looking at CTs for ?CVST, so I was wondering if you could upload a version of the image with an arrow pointing at the filling defect. The article is now a GA, and the image certainly improves it! JFW | T@lk 06:03, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

perfusion MRI

I don't know if you wrote this, but perfusion MRI is something completely different than functional MRI - functional MRI is a technique used to detect activation of brain tissue (indirectly by detecting intensity changes due to local blood oxygenation changes - BOLD), the application for this is preoperative mapping of motor and language functions and research of brain function, perfusion MRI on the other hand is used to detect brain / tissue areas with insufficient or no blood supply, the application being stroke, carotid artery stenosis / occlusion etc. ~ not logged in, ackoz —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.70.5.66 (talk) 15:22, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

I´m glad that I found Your page. I´m doing bachelor anthropology work,topic 3D visualization of human body. I´m looking for colour pictures and material that I could legal use in my work (CT, NMR, RTG, scanners). Would it be possible to use some of your photos? If yes, I have to write necessary information to pictures(where I take material and from who). Thanks for reply. wabacek@gmail.com --Wabak (talk) 22:27, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

3D visualization of human body

---

I´m glad that I found Your page. I´m doing bachelor anthropology work,topic 3D visualization of human body. I´m looking for colour pictures and material that I could legal use in my work (CT, NMR, RTG, scanners). Would it be possible to use some of your photos? If yes, I have to write necessary information to pictures(where I take material and from who). Thanks for reply. wabacek@gmail.com --Wabak (talk) 22:38, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Cardiology task force

Cardiology task force is looking for editors to help build and maintain comprehensive, informative, balanced articles related to Cardiology on Wikipedia. Start by adding your name to the list of participants at Cardiology task force Participants. ECG Unit (Welcome!)

Maen. K. A. (talk) 23:22, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

---

I am interested in requesting a CT scan of the brain showing a midline shift. This would be for use in an educational textbook. We would be happy to give you credit for any image that is provided and used. Please feel free to contact me at photoresearcher@hotmail.com and then I can provide the full information. Thank you and I look forward to your response. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbpublishers (talk • contribs) 14:50, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:CT pericardial effusion.jpg

File:CT pericardial effusion.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:CT pericardial effusion.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:CT pericardial effusion.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:11, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Evelina Children's Hospital Photo

Hello!

My name is Nick Brown and I am working with architecture for Humanity on their upcoming book Design Like You Give A Damn [2]. A sequel to the first Design Like You Give A Damn, the book offers a compendium of innovative pro-bono and humanitarian architecture projects.

We are including an essay on financing in the intro and are comparing different project types across the world. We would like to use your photo of the Evelina Children's Hospital. I understand the image is under a CC License, but we wanted to make sure we could use it, and to get the proper credit information.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me via email or phone. Thank you and we hope to hear from you soon!

173.164.250.181 (talk) 22:11, 20 October 2011 (UTC) Nick Brown Design Fellow Architecture for Humanity nickbrown@architectureforhumanity.org 415-963-3511

Request to extend permissions

Hi,

Im currently writing a thesis for my master in medical imaging. I would've liked to use your illustration http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Philips_II.jpg to show what a C-arm device looks like, but you published it under CC-BY-SA (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/), and my thesis is writen under CC-BY-NC-ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which prevents me from using your image because of the "Share alike" clause.

However, I believe the intent behind those two licences are essentially the same, and I therefore ask you your permission to use this illustration in my thesis under the CC-BY-NC-ND licence. Would you agree to let me do so? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnariel (talk • contribs) 01:07, 19 November 2011 (UTC)