User talk:Graeme Bartlett

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Wikipedia This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Graeme_Bartlett.

~

Dundasite and Crocoite.jpg
Older talk is in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 archives.
Please add your talk at the bottom of the page:

Hi Graeme,

You deleted a page for Sydney Cordle before the last general election in May 2010. He is now the party leader of the Christian Peoples Alliance and I would like to create a new page for him!

Feedback and objections, please?

Aernout Fabius aka AFabius7 — Preceding unsigned comment added by AFabius7 (talkcontribs) 21:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Contents

Talk[edit]

Dear Graeme, may we please get (will you help promote) a revision added to the diagram under "Production of Acetaldehyde" on the page of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury%28II%29_sulfate that includes the product of methyl mercury and/or all other side products? this will be highly helpfull to know what to expect from that reaction, having learned from the past, (ie: the digram shows the catalyst and acetaldehyde as resultants leaving out the methyl mercury found to be produced as a byproduct {molar by percent compared to expected non production will show how what the plant engineers in japan expected to what is actual, showing the experimental/applied and theoretical relations}). thank you ryan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.123.122.58 (talk) 12:38, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

69 You are going to have to give me a reference to base any side reactions on. A catalyst means that it is not consumed. But if say 0.1% turned into methyl mercury, it may still be a functional reaction. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:22, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Answer[edit]

Arvind asia asked another question answer one and clear my doubt In science reference desk.

a doubt on balloon[edit]

Hi Graeme, Thought I had taken the balloon into deep sea in Pacific Ocean what will happen to it ? If you find the answer talk in my talk page. Arvind asia (talk) 12:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Salt surface structures[edit]

Hi Graeme, I was wondering when the course related editing of articles such as salt surface structures would be completed, as I'm holding off from making any significant changes until then - thanks. Mikenorton (talk) 08:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

As soon as it is in article space it is a free for all. Students were asked to keep the work in sandboxes till last Friday. So you are welcome to start changing it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:35, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Graeme. I've raised concerns about possibly copyrighted images on the article talk page and on A.A.Hoffmann's own talk page as he probably hasn't seen the requests for more information on his commons talk page. Mikenorton (talk) 21:16, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

El Clasico[edit]

Hi Graeme. Requesting long term (ie. indefinite) protection of El Clasico article. Reason is simple; having an article of one of the fiercest and most contentious rivalries in world sport unprotected has led to the page being one of the most vandalised on this site, As a fan of neither team I have tried to maintain neutrality but have ended up reverting constant vandalism. I had assumed the page was locked permanently but alas it became unlocked and as usual had to revert more vandalism. Last weeks unofficial referendum in Catalonia that voted for independence is indicative of how contentious this rivalry is thus the repeated vandalism is par for the course in such an article.Carlos Rojas77 (talk) 21:53, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Protected one year. The best place to ask for this is at WP:RFPP. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:25, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Main Central Thrust at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:51, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Follow up on El Clasico[edit]

Graeme...issue on the article with an editor, Cid Campeador3, ignoring previous messages sent to him by other users on the issue of content disputes. He was told to request for comment on the dubious sources he continues to add into the article without gaining any consensus on talk. He hasn't asked for any assistance on the issue and ploughs on ahead. I'm neutral on this subject and have removed biased material from the two sets of fans; in this case, Cid Campeador3, a Madrid fan, is giving a Madrid slanted viewpoint on a contentious game (11-1 match in 1943). I'm doing my best to keep the article from being skewed toward either club, and have messaged him that he needs to follow the advice he was given by other editors to gain consensus on talk, go to arbcom if need be, rather than fragrantly ignore other editors and inserting his own viewpoint. Not just that but his English is weak, uses bare URL (and the same one several times over). I dont care what happened just that it is recorded accurately. Trying to maintain the quality of an article is not easy when someone repeatedly ignores standard practice. Your input would be welcomed.Carlos Rojas77 (talk) 02:53, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tectonics of the South China Sea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moho. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Something you mentioned in the Persondata RfC[edit]

Hi, back ages ago in this RfC, you mentioned the "AFC reviewer tool". I'm looking to notify them that Persondata is now deprecated (as per this conversation), Could you direct me where I could do that? Or where to start looking? Thanks —Msmarmalade (talk) 00:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Open your discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:14, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wanniassa, Australian Capital Territory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Binary compounds of hydrogen[edit]

Are you happy with the changes made to Binary compounds of hydrogen between 24 June 2014 and 5 December 2014? Biscuittin (talk) 17:05, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

How it is now, there is a lack of references. Some sentences are incomplete or misleading. Some substances mentioned are not binary compounds of hydrogen. There are some contradictions. But that is not the changes. When I check the changes they are mostly colour scheme(s). But I will check more. The colour scheme used in the first two periodic tables does not match, this just makes things less clear. What assessed or not-assessed is unexplained on the page. Also there is a lack of units for the enthalpies.

For the changes, which are mainly the intro to the molecular hydrides, there is an improvement, but still a lack of references. The monomeric hydrides have a wrong emphasis now on the most obscure and hard to make ones, whereas the common ones like methane, water and hydrogen chloride are not mentioned. Plasmic has not followed the requirement to include references. THough the material is not controversial, just seriously inbalanced. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:17, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Vegas logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vegas logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:15, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Salt surface structures[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Salt surface structures at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:30, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Titanium in zircon geothermometry[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:22, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

2969 views

Hi Graeme[edit]

Hi Graeme, how are you doing? Wanted a clarification. Why did you remove content in this diff and later in fact the article itself as a copyright violation? The author has applied for the auto patrolled status and generally, he looks a brilliant author. Thanks (and good to see you around). Wifione Message 01:47, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Demiurge1000 had nominated it for speedy deletion as copyright infringement, then I thought that most of the article was good and that the copyright infringing text could be rewritten or chopped. But on checking further the rest of the text was also a copyright violation. The copied text was from http://books.google.ca/books?id=mCHPARZQ0KsC&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30 Industrial Microbiology: An Introduction By Michael J. Waites, Neil L. Morgan, John S. Rockey, Gary Higton. So I cut my effort to rewrite the lot to delete the whole thing. Since this was recent you should check other work if the user appears to be productive. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:32, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your briliant comment! Those deleted articles (including the one you deleted) wasn't my recently created articles. It was one of the articles I created at my earliest time on wikipedia when I was not in any way familiar with policies. There were about 4 or 5 of them then that was blatant word-for-word copyvio, and 3 were deleted at AfD on the basis of notability. In fact I even had a competency issues then at ANI and a very big thanks to User:DGG and others who saved me from being blocked then. Over the time I had grown to be a competent wikipedian, who have a core understanding of wikipedia policies with over 50 undeleted articles (not even with any maintenance tag). See them here in order of their creation and you will see that those deleted articles wasn't my recently created articles, over 50 undeleted articles was created thereafter. I had explained this to Wifione. Thanks! Wikicology (talk) 07:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
It does look as though a big improvement has happened in the last few months, so it is back to Wifione to conclude on autopatrolled. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:32, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Graeme, the article you deleted was created by Wikicology in September 2014. I've declined his auto patrolled request as of right now. Will advice Wikicology to wait at least six months before considering applying again. Wifione Message 07:37, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Salt surface structures[edit]

Harrias talk 12:02, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

2595 page views

Seasonal Greets![edit]

Wikipedia Happy New Year.png Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello Graeme Bartlett, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015.
Happy editing,
JudeccaXIII (talk) 18:06, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

DYK for Strain partitioning[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

1370 page views

DYK nomination of Tectonics of the South China Sea[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Tectonics of the South China Sea at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:01, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Please remove this page or at least my personal information[edit]

Hello Graeme, I was googling my legal name last night and the first result pops up with an unpublished article from a Japanese search engine. This article contained personal details of mine which the initial contributor did not seek permission from me to post. No wonder I can't get a job. As a fellow Australian, I would really appreciate it if you could permanently delete the sections which state my name and birthdate, or delete the page altogether. The initial contributor has not been active since 2012, doesn't seem like he's coming back anytime soon. The page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:LukeAnthonyBurger/Stylistics and my latest revision includes all the changes I would like to be permanent (removal of all my personal details). I look forward to your response, Merry Christmas! 01:40, 25 December 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by U3083960 (talkcontribs)

Merry Chrismas U3083960. I doubt that will affect your job prospects, but it has been removed from public view on Wikipedia now by using revison deletion on the text. You can also ask oversight to delete if you need further hiding on Wikipedia. Search engine caches may take a lot longer to update though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:07, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Seasonal Greets![edit]

Wikipedia Happy New Year.png Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello Graeme Bartlett, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015.
Happy editing,
 !dea4u  11:04, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

DYK nomination of Continental arc[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Continental arc at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Brianhe (talk) 22:22, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

You've got mail![edit]

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, Graeme Bartlett. Please check your email – you've got mail!
Message added 17:59, 30 December 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

--Mdann52talk to me! 17:59, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

2015 already[edit]

Hi Graeme. No frills - just a quiet ‘’all the best’’ to you for 2015 and I hope you’ll continue to be around on Wikipedia for a long time to come. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:03, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Thankyou for the new years wish! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen[edit]

Harrias talk 12:02, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

2147 page views

Orphaned non-free image File:Terrible's Hotel and Casino logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Terrible's Hotel and Casino logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Elsevier access[edit]

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, Graeme Bartlett. Please check your email – you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Chris Troutman (talk) 21:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Undeletion[edit]

First, thank you for restoring Cannabis Science Inc.. Would you also restore the company logo [1] which was deleted after the article as orphaned fair use? The original admin who deleted it seems to have been inactive for a few months. Kindzmarauli (talk) 16:23, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:56, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

depreciated cite parameters[edit]

It looks like you are not aware that |coauthors= is depreciated in {{cite journal}}. I started removing them in Magnesium monohydride.

Some cs1 errors are visible, but other are not. If you add .citation-comment { display: inline !important; } to your vector.css file, all errors show up in their bright red glory.

Also, there is a PUA in the article... a unicode character that displays a box. It's in the citation with the title of "Subvalent Compounds Featuring Direct Metal-Metal Bonds". It was in between the two ZNs. I removed it, but I'm not sure what was supposed to be there. Bgwhite (talk) 08:51, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

I am using a Wikipedia standard gadget to add references, the "cite" button from the Wikipedia:RefToolbar. I suggest that you fix the built in scripts first! Because there will be more and more references being produced that way. People that decide to change the way a template works really need to fix everything that produces that template. That strange unicode character should look like a hyphen, but it appears it is from a "private use area". This can be fixed! Also I will add that style sheet element. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:24, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
The strange unicode would have come via https://tools.wmflabs.org/reftoolbar/lookup.php, but I don't know whether to blame that as it also has trouble with German umlauts as well. It could well be the data store behind DOI. The script putting out the coauthor is at MediaWiki:RefToolbarLegacy.js. I would appreciate if it just had an authors box and that I don't have to split up between author and coauthor any way. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:35, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
I didn't know you were using RefToolbar and I don't use it. So, I guess we are crossing wires in this case. The people who work on CS1 related templates are usually very good at informing others. RefToolbar was made aware of the depreciated parameters and was supposedly fixed. RefToolbarLegacy.js is no longer maintained.
As for the PUA, no need to worry about it. PUAs and invisible Unicode characters are added all the time, usually from copy/paste. The vast majority of the time, I know how to fix the PUA, but I was unsure in this case, thus my note. Bgwhite (talk) 22:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Repeat AfD nominee[edit]

You previously voiced an opinion on an AfD discussion on an article. It was subsequently moved to user space and made it to main space. It has been nominated for deletion again: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cantata++ (3rd nomination). If you are interested in weighing-in, it would be helpful to know if you see any improvement in the article and it currently meets WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:03, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Magnesium monohydride, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dipole moment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Continental arc[edit]

Harrias talk 12:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

1201 views

DYK nomination of Metamorphic facies of subduction zones[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Metamorphic facies of subduction zones at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Chris Troutman (talk) 23:55, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Requesting page protection on FC Barcelona[edit]

Hi Graeme. FC Barcelona's page has been subjected to repeated vandalism. The page itself only became unlocked when the higher level Admin lock expired (one of the flaws that occurs when really the page should return to being locked). Requesting page protection as its prone to vandalism, especially from ip users. Cheers--Carlos Rojas77 (talk) 17:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Protected a week, vandalism is really quite moderate for such a prominent article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage[edit]

Please approve or deny access, but please do something. I can't wait to try that Tetra quark (don't be shy) 19:00, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Sultan-ul-Faqr Monthly Magazine[edit]

Hi, I saw you declined speedy delete of Sultan-ul-Faqr Monthly Magazine. The article is part of a large promo effort by some Sultan-ul-Faqr Publications Regd., a group of socks creating and defending their promotional articles that fail any notability guidelines.

For SPI, see here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mrashid364.

Of note, Google does not return a single hit of "Sultan-ul-Faqr Monthly Magazine" apart from Wikipedia and the company's own Facebook/blog pages.

Declining speedy and forcing the article to go through XfD is an open invitation for more socks/SPAs, and will require others to spend time tracing and blocking them. This could have been avoided by speedy. Regards, kashmiri TALK 10:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

If the investigation results in a ban then we can speedy delete, or if it is too promotional then speedy delete can happen. But a large proportion of stuff here is written by someone with an interest in the subject, and if it is not too bad then a consensus can decide its outcome. Perhaps some of these AFDs could be combined if the topics are connected. Secondly if speedy delete happens there is nothing to stop another attempt to create a similar thing, but once AFD decides to delete it is very easy to delete again. So AFD is good for finality. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:56, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Valid points, thanks. kashmiri TALK 11:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

e-mail for you[edit]

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, Graeme Bartlett. Please check your email – you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 12:52, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Graeme name[edit]

Hi, I was just trying to look up "Graeme" as a name, and I see your name around -- the only usage of Graeme I recall anywhere--and I figure you must be an expert! I see Graeme goes to a dab page Graham (disambiguation) which doesn't explain much. The dab wording is a bit confusing, implying at top that Graeme can be a given name, but below sort of seeming to imply that it is only a surname. I wonder if it could be added that it is a given name of some nationality or another, at the top? I am mildly curious. It came up for me because there is a Graeme name used by me in a reference at Le Courrier de Floride, where I am worried that I might have misunderstood something (are they the author or not?), but that person has surname Hamilton. Anyhow, cheers, have a nice day. --doncram 20:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

If you look at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3APrefixIndex&from=Graeme%2F&namespace=2 you can see quite a few users, or lost of articles at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3APrefixIndex&prefix=Graeme&namespace=0. There is also Graeme (surname). Anyway it can be a given name or a surname. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:42, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Wilfred de Souza[edit]

Just curious as to why you deleted the PROD notice at the above article. The two references provided do nothing to establish notability. The first gives no reference to de Souza at all and the second is a memorial notice for his son, which only establishes that de Souza exists. I would ask that you go back and have a thorough look at the references cited and explain how they establish any notability whatsoever. Dan arndt (talk) 23:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps you are thinking of another article, as I did nothing to this one. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:35, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
This is your edit? is it not? Wilfred de Souza Dan arndt (talk) 05:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
You are right, the missing bit of the edit summary should say that prod is still possible, it was the prod blp that was declined. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Kaijuland Battles[edit]

I noticed that you declined my speedy tag as spam for this article on the basis that it could be made neutral in tone. Since it's a recent release of a non-notable game by a non-notable company, and has no claim of notability (just describes the game), I've gone to AFD. I hope you don't see this as wheeling—I decided against SD tagging for notability for that reason Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

For the issues you raise that is the correct forum. It's not wheeling! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

AWB Violation/ Capitalize the "U" in "universe" or not?[edit]

== Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. ==
Peacedove.svg

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Arianewiki1 (talk) 14:51, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Spear point[edit]

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Spear point, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Deunanknute (talk) 03:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alternaria black spot of canola (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Petiole, Inoculum and Stubble
Aztec body modification (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Maya and Branding
ECMA-407 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Ambiance and Multichannel audio
Trade during the Viking Age (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Bagdad and Conquest
Boats burials in Asia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Kita Ward
Jacob Alexander Figueroa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Topless
Rafflesia verrucosa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Perigone

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Request on 10:39:21, 21 January 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Daytodayebay[edit]


My article has been flagged as copyright material. Would you please mention which area?


Daytodayebay (talk) 10:39, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

10:43:18, 21 January 2015 review of submission by Daytodayebay[edit]


Hi Graeme

I just saw the reason of copyright. I will work on the article and resubmit.

Thanks Prabhat Daytodayebay (talk) 10:43, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Magnesium monohydride[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

4904 page views.

G. Flint Taylor[edit]

Another editor asked about the neutrality tag that you applied to G. Flint Taylor three months ago. Can you please go to the talk page, Talk: G. Flint Taylor, and explain what your neutrality concerns are? Robert McClenon (talk) 21:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Graeme - I'm the author of the article on G. Flint Taylor and am reaching out again to see if we can please resolve the concern you raised about NPOV. If you go to the talk page, another reader has weighed in. I'm not opposed to revising the article to address specific problems, but also don't think it is fair for this tag to linger indefinitely. Please help! Carolfowler1 (talk) 14:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC)Carolfowler1

Is there an adjustment necessary?[edit]

Hi, and thank you again for adding my user name to the AWB CheckPage. Hopefully you can help me, as I've had problems logging in from the AWB program. Per this discussion, another editor says that there is some character in my entry that causes AWB to not recognize my name when I try to log in. Is there any way you can get me on my way? – Paine EllsworthCLIMAX! 21:49, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much! and see my response at the AWB talk page. I am now able to login. – Paine  22:27, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Help[edit]

I want to work with files on Wikipedia. Can you provide me some links as work fields and guide pages which help me in this field. Thanks. Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 16:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Elsevier[edit]

Hi. I wanted to update you on the status of your Elsevier account. I sent the first list to Elsevier on 12 January. Elsevier reports that they will be e-mailing applicants next week with an access code, which will start your use of the resource. I appreciate your patience with this process. Feel free to contact me with any feedback or questions you have about Elsevier access. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Block request[edit]

I'm requesting a 72 hr block to help enforce a Wikibreak. My rationale is very complicated, but I want to make sure I don't come back on, as, aside from complications from an extremely rare genetic disorder I have, as mentioned here, I will be having much extra time in the next few days whereas I will be tempted to come back on Wikipedia. I hope this break will help restore my AGF.Qxukhgiels (talk) 22:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Restoring deleted article?[edit]

Hello Graham -- Vrac advised me to ask whether you could restore this article to my user space:

"17:04, 15 January 2015 Graeme Bartlett (talk | contribs) deleted page Lisandro Aristimuño (Expired BLPPROD, concern was: Unsourced BLP)"

I didn't see the note about its having no references until long after it had been deleted (it was a translation of the article on the Spanish Wiki and I didn't realize it needed references). Thanks. MagistraMundi (talk) 10:31, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for restoring. MagistraMundi (talk) 10:38, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Tectonics of the South China Sea[edit]

Harrias talk 13:44, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

1727 views

DYK nomination of Eastern Pilbara Craton[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Eastern Pilbara Craton at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:41, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Are you done? The way you phrased your most recent comment on the nomination gave the impression that you had more to do before the nomination could proceed. Please stop back when you have finished your work on it. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:43, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Whether 'Norman Copeland' is not adequately supported by reliable sources?[edit]

Hi, Graeme! You have declined my submission as it 'is not adequately supported by reliable sources.' But there are references to the London Gazette, archives, books of the Reverend Norman Copeland - aren't its reliable sources and why not if so? Suggest, please. How should I make them reliable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taraslgr (talkcontribs) 15:14, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Deicke and Millbrig Bentonite Layers[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Deicke and Millbrig Bentonite Layers at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:00, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

adding the references as you type this! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Protect Existing Article?[edit]

Graeme,

Thank you for publishing my article. Unfortunately there are some wikipedia users trying to have it deleted, as I notice they deleted another article I had contributed a good deal to with the band of musicians, artists and developers, of which Jacob Alexander Figueroa / Zander is a key contributing member. There was an article previously on the band, which I'm not sure if you were able to view before it was taken down, but it had several independent and verifiable sources yet it was taken down for having a lack thereof. It seems the same situation is now happening with the article Jacob Alexander Figueroa. As you are well aware, since you published the article initially, this article does in fact have international press and independent, verifiable sources, such as NY Arts Magazine, MPR News, and the Minneapolis St. Paul International Film Festival. I was wondering if you would be able to provide neutrality and mediation in this matter and protect the article from being removed? It seems that it is now to the point of editing for improvements, but not to be dismissed by way of deletion. Thank you for your time and help! WeAreAllStars (talk) 08:13, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

AE[edit]

Please read my post just above yours. Andy (PotW) is restricted from adding or removing infoboxes from articles (because some article owners don't like them). Suggesting to generally replace a template by a better one, or to merge two, has nothing to do with it. Unless the present restriction is changed (something some people want), we have to go by it, not by wishes for a future one. I wrote this three times today, it's tiring. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:55, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

I have removed my comment, as I am not involved with this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:12, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Seen, thank you, - wish others were as decent, - those who don't know the background dominate the foreground, unfortunately ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Infoboxes[edit]

You have posted a comment saying "Pigsonthewing is banned from infobox work". That is false. Please remove or strike it. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

The text includes "discussing the addition or removal of, infoboxes" which I generalised to "work". I will ammend my reason. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:04, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
(watching) no, it is not "work", it's about individual articles, - there have been several "clarifications" of it, archived on the case page. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
  • looking again: please read what you quoted, "discussing the addition OR removal of, infoboxes", OR highlighted, because that is the crucial point, Yes or No to a specific infobox, - a merge or replacement is "removal AND addition" and doesn't fall under the present restriction. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:13, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
  • supported by an arb, one example of many possible, "there has been so much subsequent discussion about it that the intent to restrict it to articles is abundantly clear." - wish it were so clear, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:19, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Yes, I am pretty sure that it is talking about articles. I think the issue really is add or remove vs (add and remove) that you might be disagreeing with my interpretation. The comment you point me to considers that the template discussion is out of scope. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:35, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Not sure that I understand completely but quite willing to learn. Do you mean that template discussion is not under the scope of the restriction? Then we agree. - I participate in one of them. I wanted to use {{infobox hymn}} and found that it is very limited in parameters. Therefore I looked around what else to use and found {{infobox musical composition}}. You can compare in the same article because there was a little edit war: Vom Himmel hoch, da komm ich her vs. the same with "hymn" (try to find it, - we have to deal with a user who doesn't believe an image should be in an infobox because a certain pdf-writer doesn't print an image from the infobox, but that's a different story). Consensus was for "composition". When I mentioned the problems of "hymn" to Andy he researched and made the formal request, still found on top of the pages. If you look at the discussion: some users seem to believe the article would no longer be in category hymn if the infobox name was "musical composition" (or - as I later suggested - "composition"). However: our readers don't see that difference, only editors. I fail to understand the amount of resistance. The template documentation has an example "hymn" that can be copied, if there is fear of wading through too many parameters. - Now I compare, my style of simply using "composition", and Andy's open official way, inviting discussion from everybody involved. I couldn't take what he has to take, day by day. Back to simply using "composition". --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:26, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

16:16:50, 26 January 2015 review of submission by Silverspoon83[edit]


Hi Graeme. I have submitted a further reference to support the boxer's win/lose record. I hope this is now satisfactory. With thanks. Silverspoon83 (talk) 16:16, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

17:42:07, 26 January 2015 review of submission by Armageddon's Song[edit]

I was not aware that Amazon.com was an unreliable source, nor was I aware that the the independent reviewer at arrse.co.uk was a shady character and not to be trusted, which is exactly what you have said, is it not? 


Armageddon's Song (talk) 17:42, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

18:04:43, 26 January 2015 review of submission by Armageddon's Song[edit]


2nd review. The first review related to volume one and this later review is of volumes two and three. Does that suffice?

[1]

Andy Farman Armageddon's Song (talk) 18:04, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

18:15:23, 26 January 2015 review of submission by Armageddon's Song[edit]


Apparently a second review is required and I have therefore attached the review of the second and third volumes of the series. [2]

Andy Farman

Armageddon's Song (talk) 18:15, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

18:41:01, 26 January 2015 review of submission by Armageddon's Song[edit]


Third review [3] Fourth review [4] Fifth review [5] Sixth review [6] Seventh review [7] Eighth review [8]

Do these now require their edition to the draft?

Regards

Andy Farman

Armageddon's Song (talk) 18:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

  1. ^ http://www.arrse.co.uk/reviews/armageddons-song-andy-farman/
  2. ^ http://www.arrse.co.uk/reviews/armageddons-song-andy-farman/
  3. ^ http://www.survivalistboards.com/showthread.php?t=358122
  4. ^ http://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R3ON5MR2HY5V37/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B00DDYOV14
  5. ^ http://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R3IJBSD262B5T1/ref=cm_cr_dp_title?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B00D8QHZYC&channel=detail-glance&nodeID=266239&store=books
  6. ^ http://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R38AN2LXWTE8WB/ref=cm_cr_pr_perm?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B00FBEP2OE
  7. ^ http://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R15J43CHMSOFNN/ref=cm_cr_pr_perm?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B00KEZUO8E
  8. ^ http://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R339M5KE9J9A2T/ref=cm_cr_pr_perm?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B00KEVU1CM

DYK[edit]

Hi Graeme: The DYK queue is down to a single entry, which is due to swap in to the main page in 3 hours. Could you move things from the prep area into the queue so the entry after that goes as scheduled? There are only a few of you DYK admins that are active these days... Thanks! MeegsC (talk) 22:09, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

And I am not all that active with this anymore either! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:09, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Later Sui Empire (dominating usurp during 1418-1644)[edit]

Do you mind if I revert you and re-delete it? When I originally declined the deletion, the tagger came to my talk page and gave a detailed and convincing rationale for why it was a hoax; as well, the requester's talk page is full of warnings for hoax creation, and some hours ago I blocked him for hoax creation, specifically on this article. I suppose your screen reader takes quite a while to read through long pages, so I'll be happy to provide quotations if you don't want to wade through everything. Nyttend (talk) 00:53, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

I have deleted it myself as a re-creation, it was similar enough. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:11, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. Screen reader — I had confused you with User:Graham87. Nyttend (talk) 03:45, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

10:00:24, 27 January 2015 review of submission by Armageddon's Song[edit]


All the books exist and that is verifiable. There is no stipulated requirement for reviews, or did I miss that? Armageddon's Song (talk) 10:00, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

10:32:33, 27 January 2015 review of submission by Armageddon's Song[edit]


User name change requested. http://www.arrse.co.uk/community/threads/review-armageddons-song-vols-2-3-by-andy-farman.214661/ the second review. Please inform Mr Thompson that the Amazon reviewer is Anthony Riches, author, (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AnthonyRiches) and the arrse.co.uk reviewer is a decorated veteran, neither man is a 'monkey'. Armageddon's Song (talk) 10:32, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hykmete Bajrami (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to University of Prishtina
Ian Thomson (writer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Pembroke College

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Main Central Thrust[edit]

Harrias talk 12:01, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

3619 page views

SafetyNet[edit]

Could indulge me by elaborating upon or double checking this CSD decline? It's a tag that I've noticed is handled inconsistently, which is to be expected to some extent because it requires interpretation of what "unambiguous advertising or promotion" means as it applies to a variety of cases, but this one strikes me as a particularly clear example. The entire article comprises a short definition of what kind of software it is, a website link, a line of platforms it's compatible with, and then a comparatively long list of "features". That the features list appear to be copied directly from the developer's website seems to support their promotional nature -- not necessarily in the sense of commercial advertising, of course, but in the sense that its only purpose a "feature" list serves is to promote rather than to give an encyclopedic treatment. I didn't notice it was a copy/paste job when I tagged it initially, but still don't think it requires copyvio grounds to qualify for csd. To me, if it looks like a spec sheet or marketing brochure that would be just as at home on the developer's website, it's likely it qualifies for G11. That itself is an oversimplification since there's still subjectivity involved, but that's why I'm curious how other people interpret it. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 06:53, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

A definition, and a list of features could easily be in an encyclopedic article. I would delete if the article was entirely promotional language, or full of hype. Theis often happens when it is written by PR people. But in this case there are encyclopedic contents. The tone is advertisement, but it can be edited to remove the tone (eg get rid of "your"). Speedy delete should only apply if there is nothing at all that could be saved if we deleted each promotional sentence. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:53, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
To me it seems at odds with NOT/NPOV for a bulletpointed list of software features (an unsourced list which it turns out was copied from the company website) combined with a very brief definition (that doesn't make any claim to notability), to be considered non-promotional and/or an acceptable encyclopedia article (regardless of COPYVIO issues). That said, I don't really want to argue with you on this; I just disagree with the call and am feeling a little frustrated that G11 seems like kind of a crapshoot depending on who sees the tag. On the other end of the spectrum I've seen long, multi-section, multi-sourced articles deleted for G11 as well. Ultimately I'd just be happier if it were more consistent one way or the other so I know which road to take. (FYI I've nominated this one for deletion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SafetyNet). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:22, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Well if you see long articles get deleted for G11 that should not have done, I am quite willing to give them a review, restore, and cleanup if needed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:44, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

re Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion#https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Clinicallytested/sandbox[edit]

YOu wrote: "Not done Basically you want Targeted Individual back, but there were two AFDs Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Targeted Individual and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Targeted Individual (2nd nomination) which decided to delete. There does not seem to be any prospect that this content would be come acceptable as an article."

Please notice there is an abandoned draft User:Yambaram/Targeted Individuals. As I understand, it must be deleted as well, by the same reasoning. What do you think? Staszek Lem (talk) 23:06, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

It is not abandoned, as edited in the last few months. There is a comment at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive870#WP:BLP violations etc at Targeted Individual. This draft does not suffer from the BLP problems found in the original article, so I think it looks to be an attempt to address the problems, so we can let it develop. But keep an eye on it to see if it mentions real people. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:11, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Deicke and Millbrig bentonite layers[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

RfC: AfC Helper Script access[edit]

An RfC has been opened at RfC to physically restrict access to the Helper Script. You are invited to comment. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Outbreak Customz page deletion[edit]

Please restore the page for Outbreak Customz. It has been temporarily deleted and should remain on your site. It is a licensed manufacturer and repair facility. The information on the page is correct and verifiable. Thank you in advance for your time. AJWrayIII (talk) 01:54, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

18:28:22, 5 February 2015 review of submission by Kjross[edit]


I am not sure if you were looking for anything other than a title change with the article originally titled "Loss function surrogates for classification" (it should now be "Loss functions for classification"). I have attempted to remove the word "surrogates" from the title (but as an amateur wikipedia user may have been unsuccessful). Please feel free to remove the word "surrogates" from the title if I was unsuccessful. I have no particular attachment to it and follow your reasoning for why its inclusion would be misleading. Based on your comments and those of Mark Viking, I have made no further edits. Please let me know if you were looking for further edits before accepting the article. Thanks!

Kjross (talk) 18:28, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Now accepted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Subduction zone metamorphism[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Palace Station.png[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Palace Station.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sunset Station logo.png[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sunset Station logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Texas Station logo.png[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Texas Station logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Bleu horses[edit]

Can you explain the proper fair use rationale for using the photo of the sculptures at Bleu Horses? I can live without them in the DYK hook, but would be nice to preserve them in the article itself. I've done a lot of Fair Use rationales, but usually for deceased individuals, haven't had one work for art. Montanabw(talk) 18:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Request on 22:41:36, 12 February 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Tbergquist[edit]


You reviewed the Victor P. Morris page on February 6. The permissions for the photo were sent in to Wikimedia on January 7. Hopefully the photo will be approved soon! Thanks. Tbergquist (talk) 22:41, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Tbergquist (talk) 22:41, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Eastern Pilbara Craton[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Eastern Pilbara Craton at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Lemuellio (talk) 16:39, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on WP:AN#Closure review: Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC to physically restrict access to the Helper Script[edit]

Hello! You have been selected to receive an invitation to participate in the closure review for the recent RfC regarding the AfC Helper script. You've been chosen because you participated in the original RfC. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. This message is automated. Replies will not be noticed. --QEDKTC 14:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Request[edit]

Hello, Your Honorable Graeme Bartlett!

I am here to pledge to you for User:Tetra quark. He is my close friend. He is now doing worse. He removed some warnings posted on him. He became so mean. I don't know what happened to him. But what he is doing now is very damaging.

I come here to appeal to you. Please give him another chance. I know there is still some good remaining in him. Please don't block him indefinitely. He is a good person. I am so ashamed of myself, to you, and to all his victims, but I will talk to him. Please, Your Honorable, he is the leader of WP:COSMOS. Losing him would be tragic. Anyway, I will respect your decision, Your Honorable. Allow me to post a message to him. If he deletes it or responds very badly, then I will hand him over to you.

Your Honorable, you may post a message on my talk page if you have any comments for me. Regards? SkyFlubbler (talk) 08:26, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

@SkyFlubbler: Uh... thanks for your sacrifice, but what are you talking about? I'm not going to get blocked. My 1 week block has ended. Also, stop talking as if I'm about to go to the electric chair (irl) or something Tetra quark (talk) 15:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Helium dimer[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:01, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

  • 5108 views

DYK for Eastern Pilbara Craton[edit]

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

  • 3689 views

Victor P Morris article[edit]

Permission for the image was received on February 22, 2015 from Ron Jones, ticket # 2015010710020391. Can you please publish this page now? Thanks. Tbergquist (talk) 22:38, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

I cannot tell who Ron Jones is or see the confirmation myself, hopefully Ron Jones will contact me or add a note to the draft to say that it is approved. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:57, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Self blocks[edit]

As your name appears on Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to consider placing self-requested blocks, you may sign at the newly revamped Wikipedia:Block on demand page, along with comment and a link to your requirements page, if any. Thanks, SD0001 (talk) 15:55, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Main Page/CSS[edit]

Thanks for the help. I've temporarily resigned adminship due to off-wiki issues (planning to request them back before long), and it's slightly weird having to make all these requests for things I'd normally do myself. Nyttend (talk) 16:26, 3 March 2015 (UTC)