User talk:Grapesoda22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

AfD nomination of Master Shake[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

An article that you have been involved in editing, Master Shake, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Master Shake (2nd nomination). Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Deor (talk) 00:48, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

A Barnstar for your great work[edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For the enormous amount of contributions to Adult Swim articles and for the tireless work, I hereby award Grapesoda22 the Tireless Contributor Barnstar. Thank you very much for all your work, which is a truly impressive amount of quality additions. Thank you. - Hydroxonium (talk) 08:43, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for all your efforts. -      Hydroxonium (talk) 08:43, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Robert Freeman.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Robert Freeman.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jesus vs. Frosty.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jesus vs. Frosty.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:51, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of The Boondocks episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Side (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Boondocks (season 4)[edit]

Can you stop changing the number of episodes on The Boondocks (season 4)? There is only gonna be 10, the sources that say 20 are outdated. The season comes out on DVD on June 24, so it would be impossible for there to be 20 episodes. Koala15 (talk) 17:14, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Show me a current source and I'll back down. I might also note that sometimes shows are out on DVD before they air. The set costs 40 dollars which I doubt they'd sell for only 10 episodes. They might have also decided to break up the season into two broadcast runs of 10 episodes. Grapesoda22 (talk) 18:02, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
On the back of the "Complete Series" DVD it says "including 55 episodes". Which would make this season only have 10. Koala15 (talk) 20:00, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Arbitration Request[edit]

I am required to tell you that I am currently in the process of requesting an arbitration in the matter of whether the page List of Aqua Teen Hunger Force episodes, should be arranged in order of production codes or in order of air dates/television order. It can be found here: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Production Codes Versus Air Date/Television OrderNahald (talk) 02:55, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Okay so I just now noticed that apparently I was supposed to enter all the information first, save the page, then send you a link to the page. So now that all the information is filled in, I'm relinking it to you now: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Production Codes Versus Air Date/Television Order. Feel free to add your statement. –Nahald (talk) 03:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Arbitration request declined[edit]

The arbitration request (Production Codes Versus Air Date/Television Order) involving you has been declined by the Arbitration Committee The comments made by arbitrators may be helpful in proceeding further. For the Arbitration Committee,--S Philbrick(Talk) 01:31, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sisters of the Sun may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | Caption = [[Harvard Computers]] that helped to classify the types of stars]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:03, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Standing Up in the Milky Way may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • and their reception by the [[Catholic Church]] were featured in the episode's narrative sequence.]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:04, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I found out a few hours ago that a new Powerpuff Girls reboot series coming in 2016- two years from now. I'm a little teensy-weensy bit excited, but I'm extremely shocked and wprried at the same time. 1. Is the new Powerpuff Girls reboot series going to have any canonicity to the original series, 2. Is it going to either use the original designs of the original series or the new designs of the Dance Pantsed special, and 3. are the original designs and the website of the original Powerpuff Girls series are going to be replaced? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zboogie604 (talk • contribs) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zboogie604 (talk • contribs) 02:00, 17 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zboogie604 (talkcontribs)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The King of Queens may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:07, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Images for Cosmos episodes[edit]

Hi. I reverted your changes because those images neither appeared in any of the episodes, nor are they affiliated with any episode of Cosmos. Those images illustrate the episode summary and provide explanations of the material in the summary. The episode image and caption should be reserved for images that are either featured in the episode or were created in promotion for the episode itself. -Drywater2k (talk) 18:47, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for elaborating. Grapesoda22 (talk) 18:49, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Np. Thank you for your contributions. - Drywater2k (talk) 19:07, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

it is not "fine"[edit]

Putting in bloated non-summaries full of personal interpretation and commentary and malformatting is not "fine". -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:30, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

You're the only user who had a problem with this nobody eles said anything when the page was like this over a year. Grapesoda22 (talk) 21:34, 21 June 2014 (UTC)