User talk:Gryffindor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hello, welcome to my talk page. You are welcome to post any comments below. Please be polite and follow Wikipedia guidelines.

-- coding courtesy Eleassar, thanks alot :-)

Welcome to the discussion board. Please follow the Wikiquette guidelines when posting a message [1]. I believe in good behaviour, and respect of each others opinions and intelligence and knowledge. I also believe in the good intent that each user has in this fine project. Therefore, I would ask users who post messages in the discussion board, to respect certain rules:
  • Please do not post abusive messages. Please post messages in a manner that you yourself would like to be adressed in. Messages deemed abusive or with a rude tone, condescension, nonsense or un-P.C. content will be deleted from this board [2]. Users who continuously disrespect these guidelines will be asked not to post here anymore.
  • Please post a message in neutral letters. Do not post a message in bold or CAPITALISED letters. It is unnecessary.
  • I believe that we can all be constructive members of this project, and therefore will offer my help if anyone needs anything. Likewise I appreciate and thank everyone who so far have kindly helped me out on everything :-)

Note: We all make mistakes. If you would like to leave constructive criticism regarding my performance on Wikipedia (technical issues, tone of discussion, etc.), please feel free to leave them on my own request for comments. Please leave my talk page for content-related issues.

User talk:Gryffindor/Archive1 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive2 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive3 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive4 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive5 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive6 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive7 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive8 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive9 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive10 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive11 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive12

Princess Masako[edit]

Hey Gryffindor , I am here to tell you that I removed File:Princess_Masako.jpg from Crown Princess Masako because I think it's bad fair use there. I believe that the book cover can only be used to illustrate an article about the book, which we do not have. Obviously, now your image is not being fair-used anywhere, so I guess it'll be deleted in due course unless we can find another place for it. -- Y not? 23:39, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Regions of CZ[edit]

Just to let you know, I reverted a lot of moves you made e.g. Zlín Region, because the title "Zlín (region)" is somewhat misleading, akin to moving Warwickshire to Warwick (shire). You wouldn't say "I'm in Zlín" meaning "I'm somewhere in the Zlín Region" in the same way you can say "I'm in New York" meaning somewhere in NY State, not necessarily the city. With South Bohemia, Central Bohemia, Moravia-Silesia and South Moravia I think you may have a point, though a uniform naming system seems more appropriate. The name "Moravian-Silesian Region" is used by the region itself.[3]

We could open a centralised discussion on this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Czech Republic if you still disagree. - filelakeshoe 15:18, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello Filelakeshoe, I don't understand Gryffindor's transfers of articles about the Czech regions. South Moravia, South Bohemia, Central Bohemia, Moravia-Silesia and Vysočina (region) are not correct name forms of this regions. If you say in the Czech language South Moravia, you mean Jižní Morava, a part of historical land. But it is not the same as Jihomoravský kraj (South-Moravian Region). I think it should be South-Moravian Region, South-Bohemian Region, Central Bohemian Region, Moravian-Silesian Region and Vysočina Region. I'm sorry of my bad English, hope you understand me. --Miďonek (talk) 20:12, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Please comment at Talk:Moravia-Silesia. - filelakeshoe 09:09, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Syrian flag[edit]

Hello. Your change of the Syrian flag on Wikicommons is causing a problem in the infobox of Syrian Civil War where the two-starred flag should appear. (It appears its formal name is Standard_of_the_President_of_Syria.) Shouldn't you have "archived" it so it can be used as a variant like you can the 1932 flag? I'm a novice when it comes to the syntax of icons so I can't seem to put it right. Mezigue (talk) 14:06, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Sorry my bad, the change you made was not on Wikicommons - it's a Wikipedia resource. Mezigue (talk) 16:00, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
The change at {{Country data Syria}} is being discussed at ANI. Your comment is welcome. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 16:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Syria flag[edit]

Hi Gryffindor, I reverted your edit to Template:WikiProject Syria where you replaced the Syrian state flag with a natural map of Syria. This should only be done if the government is replaced and chooses a new flag. Either way any proposal of the sort should be discussed and a consensus reached before making the change. Cheers! --Al Ameer son (talk) 02:42, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Emblem of Eritrea[edit]

I know it's been a while, but I was wondering if you could explain why you moved Coat of arms of Eritrea to Emblem of Eritrea without first discussing it on the article's talk page, after a lengthy move request discussion there had previously yielded no consensus to move. Curiously, it looks like it was allowed to stay at emblem for almost a year before being moved back to coat of arms, then you moved it back to emblem again, and just as curiously, it has stayed there another year without any complaints raised on the talk page. I'm not reporting you to AN/I or anything, because this is all old news and no one has complained on the article's talk page. I'm just curious what the rationale was and whether the article can be expected to be stable. I also hope you're not moving articles over community consensus, but apparently no one got too heated over this one. The whole reason I even encountered the article is that it is currently listed in the backlog for article reassessment at WP:HV. Personally, I'm not going to get worked up either way, about the article's title. It is a coat of arms in the same sense as any coat of arms of a peeress or member of the clergy, which usually use a lozenge or oval rather than a shield, but from the only two sources I could find, the government of Eritrea themselves refer to it as an emblem, so I suppose one title is as good as the other in this case, perhaps with a slight advantage to emblem. I just want an idea what's going on with the article and how to assess it. Wilhelm Meis (☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 04:45, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

hi there,
thank you for your message. I was not aware that there had been a vote when I moved the article you mentioned. Such votes should be respected obviously. I personally still think Emblem is the correct term, this is heraldicaly speaking not a coa. The article has been moved back. sincerely Gryffindor (talk) 06:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. It's always a good idea to check an article's move history and talk page before moving it, just in case of a previous move/revert or move discussion. Looking at the discussion and at the device itself, I could honestly go either way on it. I'd say some such emblems are decidedly unheraldic, like the so-called coat of arms of Nepal, but then this one is not such a cut and dry case. Looking at it in a heraldic perspective, I see a fieldless heraldic badge (historically, badges were frequently placed on roundels and the field was sometimes treated as untinctured) with a camel Or, all within a laurel wreath Or. Of course there is still a difference between a badge and a coat of arms, but then it could be called a coat of arms on a round shield, but at least it does seem to respect tincture (even if it places Or upon argent). But this is all stuff for discussion on the article's talk page. Thank you for respecting consensus, or at least lack of consensus to move. Wilhelm Meis (☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 14:48, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Happy Birthday![edit]

Wikipe-tan Birthday.svg
Wishing Gryffindor a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Clockery talk contribs 07:54, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Have a great birthday! Sincerely, Clockery talk contribs

Page moves[edit]

I see that some time ago (September last year), you moved several National Assembly of Fooland pages to National Assembly (Fooland). I have no objection to this, but it would have been nice if you could have fixed the incoming links from templates (e.g. the Politics of templates). Any chance you could clean this up now? Thanks, Number 57 13:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Fernando II of Portugal[edit]


Your recent move of Fernando II of Portugal to Ferdinand II of Portugal was unhelpful. You did the move without any discussion or consensus and likely without the knowledge of the years long naming disputes on Portuguese monarchs. It is best to know a situation and then act instead of merely acting without thinking.

Thank you

Cristiano Tomás (talk) 16:41, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Enthronement of the Japanese Emperor[edit]

Please do not move pages without discussion. There have been only nine empresses regnant in the approximately 2 millennia of the Japanese monarchy, with the last during the 18th century, and the modern laws do not have equal primogeniture so there is no reason to change "Emperor" to "monarch" just because the English language has different words for male and female rulers of what is known as an "empire".—Ryulong (琉竜) 01:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Title Move Discussion[edit]

I have opened up discussion at Talk:Enthronement of the Japanese Emperor#Title Move Discussion. You are invited to provide your opinion in the interest of consensus. Boneyard90 (talk) 14:06, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Las Huelgas Reales Monastery for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Las Huelgas Reales Monastery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Las Huelgas Reales Monastery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:31, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Never mind. I'm withdrawing the nomination. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:49, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Move of Philippe, King of the Belgians[edit]

This move request was open for only 7 minutes before you closed it here, without any input or discussion of the rationale between the nomination and the move. I, and perhaps others, would like to weigh in on this important change. Please undo the move so that we can continue the discussion and the opinions of others can be taken into consideration before a move is effected. Thanks. FactStraight (talk) 20:34, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

In case the notification system didn't alert you, this is now at move review. Yes, seriously. -- tariqabjotu 21:52, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:OEH logo.PNG)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:OEH logo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 16:47, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Naming of historical Japanese earthquakes[edit]

The earthquakes that you have just renamed had titles that reflected the suggestions of Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Japan-related_articles/Archive_25 and the names used in many reliable sources. Take for instance the 869 Jogan earthquake - that name returns 72 hits from Google Scholar [4], 869 Sanriku earthquake gets just 2 [5] (actually the same reference). Can I ask you to reconsider these moves please? Mikenorton (talk) 22:27, 2 October 2013 (UTC)


Hello. You recently moved Hainaut to Hainault with no explanation beyond 'English name'. Do you have any sorts of sources for that? A unilateral page move with no discussion on a page that's been at that name for over a decade seems quite bold. Oreo Priest talk 14:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

It seems you're right; I've restored mention of the archaic spelling to the article. The name isn't used anymore though. Oreo Priest talk 02:51, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Ritz-Carlton New York Central Park[edit]

Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New York City#Incorrect_URL. I don't think that it makes sense to redirect Ritz-Carlton New York Central Park to Hotel St. Moritz since they aren't the same hotel. Anyone looking for information about the Ritz-Carlton will just be puzzled to end up at a page about an unrelated business. The Ritz-Carlton isn't a successor business to the Hotel St. Moritz; it's just a new tenant of the same address. Pburka (talk) 01:18, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

I do not understand why you completely undid my revision of the page for Ritz-Carlton New York Central Park. That hotel is not just a tenant in the building. The entire building is the hotel and the Ritz-Carlton residences. It is the new name of the building, and the old name has not been used in years. Also, you undid other corrections I made such as correcting the spelling of the name of Rumpelmeyer's. If you insist on keeping the page under the St. Moritz name, I'll go along with that, though I think it is not useful. However please do not delete the rest of my accurate and current updates again unless you are arguing that they are incorrect. jamesluckard (talk) 12:44, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Kraków Cloth Hall[edit]

Thank you for renaming "Sukiennice" to "Cloth Hall, Kraków".

Some years ago I made a similar change but was reverted by a backward editor.

Do you think the pattern of "Kraków Barbican" could be adapted here, modifying "Cloth Hall, Kraków" to "Kraków Cloth Hall"?

Nihil novi (talk) 03:48, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

I also think that the Kraków Cloth Hall would be preferable. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:37, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

An ongoing problem[edit]

A year after this AN/I thread you're still making hundreds of undiscussed moves. Some of which have been problematic. If you think pages should be moved, please use WP:RM in future, so that other editors can contribute to the decision. Does that sound reasonable? bobrayner (talk) 21:12, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Coord templates[edit]

Please don't create articles with empty {{coord}} templates—as you've done at St Michael's Chapel, Wawel Castle and Café Noworolski, for instance—since doing so disfigures the articles with a big red error message. If you don't know the coordinates, just omit the template or add an appropriate {{coord missing}} template. Deor (talk) 15:30, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

re: Kraków Cloth Hall[edit]

I support naming consistency, and this is probably something that would be better discussed more publicly, probably somewhere in WP:NC namespace. Regarding translations, sure, I agree - there's only so much that the few active editors of WP:POLAND can do. With the current team, we will probably translate most of Kraków related articles, within no more than 20 years or so. You are welcome to help! :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:19, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

BoNM-Poland.png The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class
For your continued edits to Poland-related articles, and starting many Poland-related stubs, I award you this The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class, on behalf of WikiProject Poland. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:27, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
this WikiAward was given to Gryffindor by Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here on 04:27, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Budavári Palota[edit]

Recursive camera icon-(02-3 4-2))-.png
Hello, Gryffindor. Greetings from the Photography workshop. A reply has been made to your request. You may view the reply here.
If you are satisfied, please copy/paste the following code and add it to your request: {{resolved|1=~~~~}}

Begoontalk 12:36, 31 October 2013 (UTC).

You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{GL Photography reply}} template.

Henry Clay Frick House[edit]

Hey Gryffindor, I wanted to let you know that I reviewed your article and DYK hook for Henry Clay Frick House, but cannot quite approve it for DYK until you've completed your QPQ review. Great job on a wonderful article! -- Caponer (talk) 17:37, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

  • It's no problem Gryffindor, I definitely understand! The DYK nomination process is always evolving. When you submit at DYK nomination of your own creation, you must review another article. (The rules are here). Once you've completed your review of another article and its hook, you list the article you've reviewed under your own nomination submission. When you've listed the reviewed article under your submission, I can go ahead and clear Henry Clay Frick House for DYK! If you ever nominate an article that was not created or expanded by yourself, you are not required to complete a QPQ review. Please let me know if you have any additional questions! -- Caponer (talk) 18:35, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Normansfield Theatre[edit]

Sure. Give me about five/ten minutes and I'll see what I can do. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 20:53, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

That should do it. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 21:07, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
My pleasure - always happy to be of help. Keep up the good work, and happy editing! --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 21:22, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Well, a lot of what I do is trial and error. HotCat helps a lot in that regard - it fills in category suggestions as I go. That way I learn the proper syntax for the category names (which aren't always the most logical to me), and can see what I might be missing. So I'm flying blind a lot of the time. :-) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 21:34, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Yes - it's on the user preferences page, on the gadget subpage. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 21:39, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Henry Clay Frick House[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 18 November 2013 (UTC)


I made the map you requested for on Badakhshan. See Wikipedia Graphics Lab. Wereldburger758 (talk) 14:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Gaudiya Nritya[edit]

Can you please explain what caused you to to recreate this article after it was recently deleted by another Admin after substantial edit warring and abuse of multiple WP:COI accounts. If you leave this page in place I would appreciate that all the old edit histories are also placed back as a record of what went on earlier.Notabede (talk) 15:45, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

To avert an edit war, I request you to kindly reinsert the complete edit history of all contributors to this article page including the editors prior to the article being deleted. I suspect that the article seems to be either a hoax or a fringe theory to promote a school of dance which is self admittedly concocted by its exponents based on sculptures on wall of some old temples.Notabede (talk) 05:40, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Die Freiheitlichen[edit]

Hello Gryffindor, you made a good faith mistake when you made this move earlier today. Die Freiheitlichen has never been the name of the article, let alone its original one! I totally agree with you when you say that we should "discuss first", thus I ask and expect you to move the article back to its former name (The Freedomites) or its original one (The Libertarians). Many thanks, --Checco (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

I was sure of your good faith and intellectual honesty, but many thanks! --Checco (talk) 22:35, 19 November 2013 (UTC)


I have made a few maps on Galicia (after your request on Wikipedia Graphics Lab). Before I upload one of them, I want your opinion on them.

Give me your thoughts about them. Regards, Wereldburger758 (talk) 20:39, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

The same colours as the old map? What about blue and green? See wikipedia graphics lab for the map I made. Wereldburger758 (talk) 12:36, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Bengali map[edit]

I have made a map of Bengali but you should look at it before I upload it. Right now my ftp is down but I will post a link here when you can download it and have a look. Now I got it working and you can download it here Give me feedback, thanks. Goran tek-en (talk) 19:31, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you![edit]

A small cup of coffee.JPG What a great innovation to a longstanding problem! Thanks for moving Kingdom of Kashi to Benares State. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:00, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

RfC concerning the article name for Broadway[edit]

Because you were involved in a previous discussion on the subject, or related to the subject, please see RfC: What is the best name for the article about the street called "Broadway" which originates in Manhattan? BMK, Grouchy Realist (talk) 02:49, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Mahua Mukherjee[edit]

Hi! The ref to the claim was provided in my edit summary and its here again; the Uni's website. Some ref already exists in the article's listed refs. Even if you were changing is to was, there was no need to remove Category:Rabindra Bharati University faculty as such category is not only for current faculty of for dead and decayed faculty too. Removing "Dr." from title is fine, but i still don't know it's reason. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 00:53, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Oh i get it! You didn’t find her name because you don't know that Mukherjee means Mukhopadhyay. Also, look before blindly reverting. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:56, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Okay... i get it. Will add the Uni's website as source. And i was calling this edit as blind revert as i was only fixing the reference; the old link wasn't working. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:01, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Stadtschloss Berlin[edit]

You moved it to an English name. I don't think it's uncontroversial. Did you see the name question on the talk? The common name seems to be the German name. If I was you, I would move it back and formally request a move on the talk page. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:40, 15 January 2014 (UTC)



Hi! I think that you have uploaded this file on Wikipedia. Don't you have this image with a better quality?Keivan.fTalk 19:51, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for answering as soon as you could. I'll try to find some information about this painting and of course a better quality of it.Keivan.fTalk 20:57, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Akbar I[edit]

I see you added the reference for the name and I thank you for that but why remove Mughal emperors and Mughal weapons from see also section? Sajjad Altaf (talk) 16:25, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Indian War Memorial Museum[edit]

Hello, Gryffindor, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Indian War Memorial Museum, appears to be directly copied from Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Indian War Memorial Museum if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 22:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Red Fort completion[edit]

Hi Gryffindor
I would really like to complete and finish the Red Fort but I need your feedback, so please go there and give me feedback, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 11:51, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve Inayat Khan (historian)[edit]

Hi, I'm MrNiceGuy1113. Gryffindor, thanks for creating Inayat Khan (historian)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi, being a history article, it deserves a little more detail and references. Can work wonders if elaborated as it's got for back-up a rich history of a land of mystique called, India. Best regards

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 16:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Chunam listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]


An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chunam. Since you had some involvement with the Chunam redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. KJ click here 02:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)


What are you hoping to accomplish with this behaviour? And an admin, no less, so you can't really feign ignorance. Curly Turkey (gobble) 16:23, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Red Fort[edit]

You explanations do no cover why none of the categories belong in the main article. Plain and simply, categories go in articles. If you have a category on the topic, then you can put categories there if they apply to the vast majority of the content in the subcategory. By definition that pretty much says that not every category that belongs in the article does not belong in the subcategory. As I said along the way, one example is that jewels are not a fort! Vegaswikian (talk) 19:07, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Map Workshop - Red Fort[edit]

Hello, i am currently cleaning up the Map Workshop. Is your request regarding the Red Fort resolved? Is the current version as you want it? If so, please mark it as{{resolved|1=~~~~}}, if not, please specify what more needs to be done. Thank you.--DLommes (talk) 16:08, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed new EU introduction[edit]

Hello, on the EU talk page I have made a proposal for a new introduction for the EU that I believe summaries the EU better and makes it more engaging. I would be grateful for any constructive feedback. My hope is to have the page become a featured article and contribute to Project European Union as a whole. --Erzan (talk) 14:20, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Mughal Empire Flag[edit]

I've had a go at making the triangular flag over at the Graphics Lab. NikNaks talk - gallery 23:19, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

I have made some of the changes you asked for and commented over at the lab. NikNaks talk - gallery 13:57, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Still waiting to hear whether the current version is satisfactory. Thanks! NikNaks talk - gallery 13:00, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Given that you've been editing and haven't posted a response, I will assume you are satisfied and mark the request resolved. NikNaks talk - gallery 23:35, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment[edit]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arasta Bazaar[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Arasta Bazaar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN mall.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 02:08, 21 June 2014 (UTC)