“It’s really hard to be conscious of this on a minute-by-minute basis online, but the Internet is made of people, and it works best when we remember that this thing is not a series of tubes but a conglomeration of human beings.”
— John Green
It would be useful for sysop to review these posts. , . I find the language to be unacceptable, I feel the IP should get a warning. And despite their protestations, in their 2014 post they did suggest wikipedia's deliberately self harm in order to get a more suitable image for use in the article. Which is totally unaaceptable. Then this is just a continuation of their disruptiveness , they just don't seem to know when to stop!
Polyamorph (talk) 08:48, 27 May 2015 (UTC) P.S. Long time no see, I'm still in retirement but am a bit of a lurker and very occasionally still edit.
Nice to see you, Polyamorph. I hope your are well. After looking over the page you linked I agree that the IP has been disruptive. They seem to be hopping through a wide range and I don't want to protect the tank page. I think this is a time to ignore them without any technical measures. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 15:31, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Guerillero, other administrators have since blocked the IP and their various sock puppets. All good thanks, just very busy, but that's a good thing. Hope you are well too! Cheers, Polyamorph (talk) 12:21, 28 May 2015 (UTC)