User talk:Guruclef
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Regarding your edit to Wikipedia:
Your recent edit to Wikipedia (diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as a new user editing a page that experiences frequent malicious edits by banned users that continue to edit via shared IP ranges. Since these ranges are too large (collateral damage) to be blocked and user's IP addresses are not visible, edits to this page by logged-out editors of shared IP ranges or new users may be reverted. The changes can be reviewed and restored by established users. If you don't use a shared IP, you may be able to avoid this by making the edit while logged out. // VoABot II 17:34, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
I don't agree with your changes, VoABot... --Guruclef 06:09, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm incredibly sorry; I thought you were removing content, but you added a whole 'nother paragraph! Patrolling can really numb one senses. Apologies! - Kribbeh 05:20, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Ugh...it really can be a chore. But, the job needs to be done. *shrug.* And apparently, I do a cracker-jack job of it. Oh well, back to hunting vandalism. - Kribbeh 05:29, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Please note that there was already a discussion and it was agreed that there needs a seperate article for this syndrome. That was the reason why the tag was removed. Doctor Bruno 13:39, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
|
You are cordially invited to join WikiProject Chile
|
 |
You appear to be someone that may be interested in joining WikiProject Chile. Please accept this formal invitation from a current member of the project. |
|
If you decide to join the project, please add your name to this list. |
|
I hope you accept! - Kimontalk 16:54, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
- Guruclef (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
- 190.21.66.103 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · info · WHOIS · RDNS · trace · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
|
CheckUser evidence has determined that the IP address or network of your account has been used (not necessarily by you) to disrupt Wikipedia. It has been blocked from editing to prevent further abuse. If you get this message, please read the following information. |
| Wikipedia tries to be open, but we sometimes must block a range of IP addresses or entire network, to prevent editing by abusers, vandals, or block evaders. These "range blocks" can affect users who have done nothing wrong. If you are a legitimate user, follow the instructions below to edit despite the block. Users who are the intended target of a range block may still appeal the block.
IP users (without an account): If you do not currently have a account and wish to bypass this block, an account can be created to allow you to edit. Please use this form or e-mail us at unblock-en-l lists.wikimedia.org (you will be unable to copy the "@" from this sentence) to request an account under your preferred username. It is important that you use an e-mail address issued to you by your ISP, school, or organisation, so we may verify that you are a legitimate user. If using the form, please refer to this block under "comments". If e-mailing, please refer to this block in your message.
Registered users (with an account): If you already have an account in good standing, please follow these instructions. You may also request IP block exemption to bypass blocks unconnected with you that affect your editing. Post an unblock request to your user talk page.
Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not amend or remove this block without consulting a CheckUser. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped, per this notice.
|
:
Decline reason:
Seems to have been addressed below. —
Daniel Case (
talk) 12:34, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Before we act on the above request; it seems unusual that this account has been inactive for over two years, and shows up to edit again shortly after the above user was blocked. Have you used any other accounts in the meantime? --Jayron32.talk.contribs 01:09, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- I have changed the settings of the block. You should be able to edit freely now. Sorry for the inconvenience! Regards, Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 04:07, 8 May 2009 (UTC)