User talk:HLachman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, HLachman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! You are also invited to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing. extra999 (talk) 06:38, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bitcoin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intrinsic value (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Declined 3O request[edit]

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I declined your 3O request because there are currently three users involved in the dispute. I recommend you going to DRN as a next step. As I am a volunteer there, I personally will be able to assist with the case. --Regards, MrScorch6200 (talk · contribs) 02:12, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

DRN[edit]

DRN case closed[edit]

Wikipedia-Medcab.svg Hello, I am [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]], a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. You recently filed a request or were a major party in the DRN case titled "NOT GIVEN". Unfortunately, the case was closed regardless because a major party declined to participate as he believes a consensus can be reached on the talk page. When these issues have been addressed, you may refile the DRN request or open a thread on another noticeboard as appropriate. If you have any questions please contact me on [[User_talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|my talk page]] or at the DRN talk page. Thank you! -- This message has been sent as a courtesy using a standardized template.

  • Additional comments by volunteer: None

--Regards, MrScorch6200 (talk · contribs) 22:12, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Request to revert edits affecting the material under discussion undertaken since Fleetham's consensus-building attempt[edit]

I did not make any edits to the section since Fleetham's attempt. Ladislav Mecir (talk) 18:23, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

The above statement (18:23, 31 Jan.) is a false claim, and is offensive for that reason. I have refuted it here. -- HLachman (talk) 07:19, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Civility discussion[edit]

Citing the preceding contribution by another editor: " Please do not edit any of the disputed material until consensus has been reached. It will be considered unconstructive and will be dealt with accordingly." You admitted that consensus has not been reached and edited two sections, both of them in a misleading way. Since you suggest me to avoid calling such an edit "disruptive", could you, please, give me an advice what is the appropriate notion I should use instead of "disruptive" for such editing practice? TIA Ladislav Mecir (talk) 14:24, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Ah, OK, found the appropriate notion in this case, it seems to be called "unconstructive", thank you. Ladislav Mecir (talk) 14:28, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

I stated my reasons for my edits. The next step is to produce a consensus solution. I have posted a more detailed response on your talk page. -- HLachman (talk) 16:25, 5 February 2014 (UTC)