User talk:HMSSolent/Archive 4

HMSSolent would like to initiate a speedy deletion for Southern Cross Records. This individual, who does not speak English, is unreasonable in requesting the deletion because the information for the record label, which has been producing recordings since 1984, is no different in this respect from any other independent record label. This is my first entry and it does not violate any copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rospratch (talk • contribs) 09:06, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

• The article was deleted because you did not include citations to prove its notability. You are welcome to recreate the deleted page, but please ensure that you include your references with them. Also please see WP:MUSIC. hmssolent\Let's convene 08:46, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
• After looking up the subject on Google, there is little, if any references to Southern Cross Records. hmssolent\Let's convene 08:52, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Moiez

Hello HMSSolent, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Moiez, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 11:17, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks for reminding. I tagged it for A7 as it did not intially have any citations, but since that's out of the way, it's definitely a keeper. Haven't seen the watchlist for quite a while though. hmssolent\Let's convene 06:42, 24 January 2013 (UTC)