26 February 2014

## Holiday wishes!

 Headbomb, thanks for your hard work this year, you deserve wonderful holidays! I wish you success and happiness in your endeavours for this coming year, and I hope we'll be able to carry on improving the wonderful project that is Wikipedia together! Keep rocking on! :) Salvidrim!, wrapping up another great year of collaboration with y'all!

## %

Don't know if you saw the problem w %. 12.3%+4.5%
−6.7%
and 12.3%±4.5% (both for 12%) are rather ambiguous, & should probably be formatted like degrees. — kwami (talk) 13:19, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

## Simple request

Resolved

Could you, as the sole author, blank & delete this Template:Infobox element/Print template ({{db-g7}})? It would clean up unused subpages. -DePiep (talk) 06:04, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

It's not quite unused, but I'll take a look at it this week and see if it's still needed. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 12:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
On second thought, never mind. If it bothers me, I'll have to do a clean TfD. This shortcut is not shorter. Let's forget it. ;-) -DePiep (talk) 15:32, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American Association of Variable Star Observers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David B. Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

I don't necessarily disagree with demerging, I just want a square understanding of what exactly is supposed to go where.

At the moment Hogbin has moved less than half of the history of Faraday's law into one article and left the rest where it was; and he is pretty adamant that that is how it should be, although he's been unable to explain why; he's got vague thing about separating theory and practice, but so far a I can see most of both articles are actually theory.

$\mathcal{E} = -N {{d\Phi_B} \over dt}$