User talk:HkCaGu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Archives: 2007: Jun-Dec. 2008: Jan-Jun, Jul-Dec. 2009: Jan-Jun, Jul-Dec. 2010: Jan-Jun, Jul-Dec. 2011: Jan-Jun. Jul-Dec. 2012: Jan-Jun, Jul-Dec. 2013: Jan-Jun, Jul-Dec.

WP Airports in the Signpost[edit]

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Airports for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 03:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Jet Airways to JFK[edit]

Do you know if Jet Airways is flying to JFK on May 1, 2014? Etihad's press release ( states that Jet Airways will operate the flight on May 1, 2014 with Etihad operating the flight on March 1, 2014. On Jet Airways destinations page, an IP made JFK a future resumption JFK cannot be booked on Jet's website directly and the flight is not coded "9W". Can you take a look? Thanks! (talk) 02:35, 22 January 2014 (UTC)


Hey sorry for the edit but do you know air india has a flight to New York JFK from London Heathrow. If you don't trust me go on google an write AI6335 that flight is lhr to jfk. Thank you and sorry about bhx air india! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madbid1 (talkcontribs) 19:12, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

It's a Kuwait Airways flight, not operated by Air India. HkCaGu (talk) 21:21, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Actually Air India runs a separate flight you could double check-

As explained by HkCaGu, the flight is a Air India codeshare with Kuwait Airways operating the flight! AI6335 (is the codeshare flight) and KU101 (the actual operator) is LHR-JFK. Rzxz1980 (talk) 19:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Incident - Grave violation of human rights at Chek Lap Kok Airport.[edit]

There is a huge bias about what is an incident or not, a transgender woman, was sexually abused in this airport, and it was hugely reported on local and international media, but people like you is afraid to acknowledge this grave violation of human rights as an incident, please tell me how the wikipedia defines what an incident in the airport is considered? your definition is quite arbitrary and by the way discriminative, if we need some people from LGBT portal in Wikipedia coming to show what an incident mean, let me know it advance, we will bring them, there is not space for discrimination in Wikipedia, be sure about that Rubashkyn (talk) 06:46, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Two months ago, and no news media bothered to follow up. It's not notable, period/full stop. HkCaGu (talk) 07:18, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Ok, lets going to see what the People from Wikipedia and the LGBT human rights think about that. I don't want to fight with someone who only constrain the definition of Incident related to a self-defined term. I know this is your article and your issue but don't be blind and unsensible to these issues. If you are not, I don't care, somebody will care in the LGBT english human rights in Wikipedia. Good luck. Rubashkyn (talk) 09:18, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
I came here following the edits of both of you. IMHO, this is not an incident directly related to the airport and the purpose of it, i.e, airline operations. If this incident is worth mentioning anywhere, I don't think the better place for doing so is the airport article. Nevertheless, consensus can be gained for it to be included, but this should be discussed first.--Jetstreamer Talk 10:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
And I concur with what Jetstreamer says above. The only place this incident may belong in the article is in the history section. But first the incident's sources must be verified as WP:RS and second a discussion should be done on whether this is even notable. There are tons of TSA acting badly stories out of the United States but few pass the notability test for mention in any airport articles....William 13:34, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Sendai Airport[edit]

Do you know if Air China's service to Sendai Airport is seasonal or not? A user stated that the service is not seasonal but the airline just cancelled service to the airport for the winter but isn't that the same as a seasonal service (the airline plans to resume service there on 30 March 2014). Thanks! Rzxz1980 (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

It could be argued either way. But if they planned for year-round but just canceled it, then it can be said as "not" seasonal. See what you can find toward the end of the published schedule. If you can see another week in the future without flights, then it is seasonal. HkCaGu (talk) 20:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Regarding Free area of the Republic of China[edit]

Hello HkCaGu. You may be responding to another user's edits to Free area of the Republic of China by reverting them, as you may feel he is wrong with his edits. However, you are not exempt from the 3RR rule. I am also not pleased with your shouting in your edit summaries. If you persist in reverting the user's edits repeatedly, I will have to report you to WP:AN/EW. Please attempt to solve your arguments with the user in a civil and orderly manner, and not disruptively. Optakeover(Talk) 04:46, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

I have posted a message on the article talk page, at Talk:Political status of Taiwan#HkCaGu and's edits. I suggest that you take a look at it. Have a great day! Optakeover(Talk) 05:09, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

You are on the verge of edit warring. Please take it to the talk pages or you may be subject to a block. Thank you, Mkdwtalk 05:12, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

This is the end of my editing day. I'm ceasing. I'll let many other editors talk, if they even find that worth their time. Maybe they'll just revert. Meanwhile, the IP has gone into 4RR on at least two articles. I'm not even going to report him. Not today. HkCaGu (talk) 05:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Kuala Lumpur Subang airport and KLIA[edit]

On your homepage you said clearly "WMKK/KUL" and yet you put Kuala Lumpur-Subang. Do you know that Kuala Lumpur Subang is a totally different airport? It is WMSA/SZB. If you are from Hong Kong, then the main international airport you would have flown out is KLIA and NOT Kuala Lumpur-Subang. Subang airport is the secondary airport serving regional and small aircraft only. You claim to be in the airline editor, but yet you do not know this simple thing. (talk) 17:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Do you even know when I flew there? In 1997, The KL Airport in Subang was WMKK and KUL. My user page is my page, not an encyclopedia article. It lists what things were. Nagoya Komaki was NGO. Kai Tak was HKG. I've been to Hong Kong, China but have never lived in Hong Kong, China despite being born in Hong Kong. Everything is very clearly unambiguous. HkCaGu (talk) 17:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

It is very misleading if you were to continue it like that. KL Airport in Subang was WMSA all the while. Only the IATA code changed. And at that time it was not called Kuala Lumpur-Subang but Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah Airport. Only now has it been called as Subang Skypark. Do you like it if I were to call Hong Kong as a province of PRC? Do you like it if I called you China born instead of Hong Kong born? Learn some respect Timothyngim (talk) 17:39, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

No you're still wrong. Subang Airport was WMKK. And Hong Kong has never been a "province". It was considered legally part of Guangdong under PRC laws until HKSAR was established in 1997. And I wouldn't be offended whichever way you classify my birth place, as Chinese Nationality Law considers HK/M/Taiwan within China. I use the right names and right flags for the right times in history. Nothing misleading. Nothing contradictory. HkCaGu (talk) 17:49, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Malaysia Airlines Flight 370[edit]

Where is your source that "Subang Air Traffic Control Centre reported at 02:40" that the aircraft was lost? The source we do have from the airline says that contact was lost at 02:40, but there is no source to say when this was actually reported, so it's accurate to say contact had been lost at 02:40, not reported at 02:40 that contact had been lost. sroc 💬 12:49, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Subang cannot possibly have contact with MAS370 until 02:39. (as replayed by this Youtube user [1]) shows the plane already nearly reaching the Vietnamese boundary when it was last reported at 01:20. Malaysia had handed over the plane to Vietnam. It cannot have been flown for another 80 minutes and still talking to Malaysia. So if "Subang" reported it lost, it would've been after some coordination and procedures. The airline's statement is not primary and is in this case its wording obviously not reliable. HkCaGu (talk) 13:01, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Best reliable source: [2] HkCaGu (talk) 13:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for this. Your edit summaries didn't provide a source to justify the claim and contradict the airline's account. I've added the source to the article in order to reflect the time. sroc 💬 14:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

China Southern's flight from CAN to FRA[edit]

Starting 20 June 2014, China Southern will be launching service from Guangzhou to Frankfurt as per But the flight makes a stop in Changsha (however, therefore should Frankfurt be listed with domestic destinations? but IPs continue to move it to international at Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport page since it make a stop at a domestic destination before heading to Frankfurt)? But I don't know if domestic/international gates at CAN are separated. Rzxz1980 (talk) 00:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Yes, CAN is definitely separated domestic vs. intl. As long as one can buy CAN-Changsha, the flight will operate out of domestic. HkCaGu (talk) 02:10, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
I have move it back to domestic (CZ331 CAN-CSX segment is bookable on China Southern's website and that segment uses an Airbus A332 also Changsha is not a hub for China Southern). Rzxz1980 (talk) 07:18, 9 March 2014 (UTC)


Hey -- could you see this thread and provide some more feedback so we can possibly try to implement the changes. Tofutwitch11 (TALK) 19:42, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

KLM destinations[edit]

Hello. Regarding this edit, the source you added does not support the claim. Actually, it does not even mention a firm date for the closure of Manston Airport but just a potential end for the activities. As I already explained in my edit summaries, references provided should directly support the statements. Even though WP:AIRLINE-DEST-CONTENT suggests the use of sources for each entry, the verifiability policy is clear in that "All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material." My two reversion were just following a basic policy.--Jetstreamer Talk 12:03, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Then you need to understand when a "challenge" becomes disruptive. Cancellations are often quietly done since they're not PR material. A user explaining zeroing out flights (a major airline with a well organized website after all) accompanied with related news articles are enough to be verifiable. Let's focus the battle on unexplained IP edits, not good faith editors. I don't want to see Wikipedia become a place where screen-grab graphics are uploaded just to prove a point. HkCaGu (talk) 15:52, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Albert Pyun……again[edit]

He just won't stop. He's rv the edit you and I have been dealing with the last couple of days at Albert Pyun. He's finally cited a source - to an online magazine called "Impact." It's just an interview with him. The first line of the interview reads: Impact has long championed the career of Albert Pyun... Doesn't sound like a balanced source to me if it's a verifiable source to begin with. And needless to say, the post isn't properly formatted or copy edited. Like I was actually expecting that. Readyforanderson (talk) 20:10, 18 April 2014 (UTC)Readyforanderson

Well, in reading up on WP:BIASED, I guess the source does not have to be neutral. But the cited source Pyun is using is just the interview of himself. Readyforanderson (talk) 20:25, 18 April 2014 (UTC)Readyforanderson